You obviously do not understand. Whatever do you think royalty was? Kings? Queens (not you personally, I mean real queens) and Emperors? Pharoahs? Read a book bitch, learn that all ordered, civilised society was started by those leaders, all perfect examples of fascism.[/b]Guiscard wrote:Der Fuhrer wrote:You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
Capitalism sucks
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
or perfect examples of a monarchy, absloutismDer Fuhrer wrote:You obviously do not understand. Whatever do you think royalty was? Kings? Queens (not you personally, I mean real queens) and Emperors? Pharoahs? Read a book bitch, learn that all ordered, civilised society was started by those leaders, all perfect examples of fascism.[/b]Guiscard wrote:Der Fuhrer wrote:You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Ah yes, democracy. Remove one corrupt leader, only to have him be removed with yet another. Cut the head off from the evil democracy, yet another takes its place. The phoenix of hell as it were.Frigidus wrote:At least with democracy a corrupt leader can be removed. Takes a coup with facism. As for civilization rising from fascism? The cultural identity of the West, as an example, was first established in Greece, a Republic. Even if that wasn't the case civilization could rise from any form of government. Dictatorship is just the simplest, and hence one of the first used, form.Der Fuhrer wrote: That's the case with all forms of government you moron. One need only have an leader who cannot be swayed by corruption, and nary a soul would complain about fascism. Think about how we, as a species, came to be civilised. You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
I should like to add, Greece was under totalitarian rule before becoming a Republic. What if there had been no such rule? Would this Republic have come to be? What of Rome? Caesars ruled, before the Senate gained more power and lead the Empire?
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Still fascism, thus my point remains. I am undeterred, as is my beloved fascist ideology.Tyr wrote:or perfect examples of a monarchy, absloutismDer Fuhrer wrote:You obviously do not understand. Whatever do you think royalty was? Kings? Queens (not you personally, I mean real queens) and Emperors? Pharoahs? Read a book bitch, learn that all ordered, civilised society was started by those leaders, all perfect examples of fascism.[/b]Guiscard wrote:Der Fuhrer wrote:You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
any anyway it seems to me that those leaders didnt so much start civilisation as inherit the right to rule and i think we can argue that with reak rulers the government tended towards and oliarchy or aristocracy. any a civilisation would be very well developed before the concept of a hereditary ruler evolved
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
you do realized that a monarchy and facism are different concepts of governemnt right?Der Fuhrer wrote:Tyr wrote:or perfect examples of a monarchy, absloutismDer Fuhrer wrote:You obviously do not understand. Whatever do you think royalty was? Kings? Queens (not you personally, I mean real queens) and Emperors? Pharoahs? Read a book bitch, learn that all ordered, civilised society was started by those leaders, all perfect examples of fascism.[/b]Guiscard wrote:Der Fuhrer wrote:You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
Still fascism, thus my point remains. I am undeterred, as is my beloved fascist ideology.
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Why yes, one is outdated, whilst the other is quite modern, and refreshing in the concept of statehood. There is very little difference between the two. Both systems merely had different masters who acted as tthe State.Tyr wrote:you do realized that a monarchy and facism are different concepts of governemnt right?Der Fuhrer wrote:Tyr wrote:or perfect examples of a monarchy, absloutismDer Fuhrer wrote:You obviously do not understand. Whatever do you think royalty was? Kings? Queens (not you personally, I mean real queens) and Emperors? Pharoahs? Read a book bitch, learn that all ordered, civilised society was started by those leaders, all perfect examples of fascism.[/b]Guiscard wrote:Der Fuhrer wrote:You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
Still fascism, thus my point remains. I am undeterred, as is my beloved fascist ideology.
Der Fuhrer wrote:Why yes, one is outdated, whilst the other is quite modern, and refreshing in the concept of statehood. There is very little difference between the two. Both systems merely had different masters who acted as tthe State.Tyr wrote:you do realized that a monarchy and facism are different concepts of governemnt right?Der Fuhrer wrote:Tyr wrote:or perfect examples of a monarchy, absloutismDer Fuhrer wrote:You obviously do not understand. Whatever do you think royalty was? Kings? Queens (not you personally, I mean real queens) and Emperors? Pharoahs? Read a book bitch, learn that all ordered, civilised society was started by those leaders, all perfect examples of fascism.[/b]Guiscard wrote:
Still fascism, thus my point remains. I am undeterred, as is my beloved fascist ideology.
facism would never work for any significant length of time in a modern country
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Not a modern country for sure, modern countries have wide-ranging freedoms of speech. He hasn't quite gotten around to it yet, but I'm sure he'll explain why that's a bad thing.Tyr wrote:Der Fuhrer wrote:Why yes, one is outdated, whilst the other is quite modern, and refreshing in the concept of statehood. There is very little difference between the two. Both systems merely had different masters who acted as tthe State.Tyr wrote:you do realized that a monarchy and facism are different concepts of governemnt right?Der Fuhrer wrote:Tyr wrote:or perfect examples of a monarchy, absloutismDer Fuhrer wrote: You obviously do not understand. Whatever do you think royalty was? Kings? Queens (not you personally, I mean real queens) and Emperors? Pharoahs? Read a book bitch, learn that all ordered, civilised society was started by those leaders, all perfect examples of fascism.[/b]
Still fascism, thus my point remains. I am undeterred, as is my beloved fascist ideology.
facism would never work for any significant length of time in a modern country
- unriggable
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Because success shouldn't be measured in money. You're not leeching success, you're leeching their payroll, which is almost always not directly theirs to keep. It's the workers, yet they get paid shit wages.Risktaker17 wrote:I can't believe I am agreeing with a guy with the username Der Fuhrer, but he is right. The people with huge amounts of money earned it one way or another, and what right do you have to leech of their success.

-
ChainsOfHell
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:50 am
My dear friend unriggable, I am quite sure you are an educated wise man...
There is an Arab saying that says:
There are 4 fingers between truth and fiction
That means there is no "Kind of right" or "kind of wrong", you and I have professed our views regarding Capitalism and we have thrown in our evidence...
Now, what we do is not reply until the other side counters our argument with "evidence" and not "beliefs"
And now regarding Der Fuhrer:
Grow up... Learn not to use taboos when arguing/ debating...
There is an Arab saying that says:
There are 4 fingers between truth and fiction
That means there is no "Kind of right" or "kind of wrong", you and I have professed our views regarding Capitalism and we have thrown in our evidence...
Now, what we do is not reply until the other side counters our argument with "evidence" and not "beliefs"
And now regarding Der Fuhrer:
Grow up... Learn not to use taboos when arguing/ debating...
- unriggable
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Evidence? Link please?ChainsOfHell wrote:Now, what we do is not reply until the other side counters our argument with "evidence" and not "beliefs"
There is no such thing as evidence in something like this since it is policy, not a crime scene.
I just think that single mothers should be able to get welfare.

-
ChainsOfHell
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:50 am
- unriggable
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
-
ChainsOfHell
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:50 am
And yet again, Hitler was a genius... But Im not quite sure about our dear friend Der Fuhrer...unriggable wrote:It's hard to argue with somebody knowing that if you compare them to hitler, you automatically lose, especially when the guy you're arguing with is hitler...ChainsOfHell wrote:And now regarding Der Fuhrer:
Grow up... Learn not to use taboos when arguing/ debating...
- unriggable
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Okay. Evidence. The new deal, possibly the most socialist set of bills signed within the US, stimulated the economy during the depression. In the few decades following the depression and world war 2, when the economy was at its highest, the upper 1% had about 13% of the nations wealth - in the years before the great depression, the late 1920's, they had 17%. The economy has slowly been draining since the 50's: now the upper 1% have 17.4% of the nation's wealth.
Conclusion: The more the rich are taxed, the better the economy. And it's no surprise: Money that would normally be stored in banks or safes is instead circulated through the poor.
Conclusion: The more the rich are taxed, the better the economy. And it's no surprise: Money that would normally be stored in banks or safes is instead circulated through the poor.

- unriggable
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
yar.
Socialism is wicked, cos it like takes muney of of like well rich poeople, who are like maeking like wars n r killing jews. When i grow up i wanna be an parking attendant to teak muney of of like poeple wiv cars cos dey are like richer than me. When i see like mercs and beemers parked on streets i liek keyin em, cos dey are fukking scumbags who like rob people n R racist and like wanna kill iraki's.
Socialism is wicked, cos it like takes muney of of like well rich poeople, who are like maeking like wars n r killing jews. When i grow up i wanna be an parking attendant to teak muney of of like poeple wiv cars cos dey are like richer than me. When i see like mercs and beemers parked on streets i liek keyin em, cos dey are fukking scumbags who like rob people n R racist and like wanna kill iraki's.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
- ignotus
- Posts: 2766
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
- Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.
- Contact:
At least you are honest, little norsey.Norse wrote:yar.
Socialism is wicked, cos it like takes muney of of like well rich poeople, who are like maeking like wars n r killing jews. When i grow up i wanna be an parking attendant to teak muney of of like poeple wiv cars cos dey are like richer than me. When i see like mercs and beemers parked on streets i liek keyin em, cos dey are fukking scumbags who like rob people n R racist and like wanna kill iraki's.
heavycola wrote:I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
- got tonkaed
- Posts: 5034
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Detroit
i know, its really the keying the beemers that gets me my monthly reup for membership in the local socalist anti beemer club.Norse wrote:yar.
Socialism is wicked, cos it like takes muney of of like well rich poeople, who are like maeking like wars n r killing jews. When i grow up i wanna be an parking attendant to teak muney of of like poeple wiv cars cos dey are like richer than me. When i see like mercs and beemers parked on streets i liek keyin em, cos dey are fukking scumbags who like rob people n R racist and like wanna kill iraki's.
Dudes. I liek meant the word "wicked" in da slang way of like saying "good".
Once again, my works are ruined by autistic barstewards.
Once again, my works are ruined by autistic barstewards.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
- got tonkaed
- Posts: 5034
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Detroit
it was clear in context, no worries there. I thought it was a pretty good representation all in all, you should think about trying for a spot as a scab writer over here in the states, i hear the writers guild is gonna be out for quite some time.Norse wrote:Dudes. I liek meant the word "wicked" in da slang way of like saying "good".
Once again, my works are ruined by autistic barstewards.
You could write for the V for Vendetta sequel "Socialistsz in Englands! -vives thar revolutios!"
