JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:hulmey wrote:Why not JR ? This could be the Guiness Book of CC where every record is important!!
great idea hulmey, the only difference is i add the top 5 instead of just #1's so more get the credit they deserve, also SE was and is not a clan, but a special collection of talent in a group, to make it is very very hard to do, and the 1st 5 was and is quite an accomplishment, and all that made it afterwards are solid too, they are not only skilled in teams, they super in singles play, but this is a thread of 5's, so i agree with hulmey here.
the 1 on 1's games are too much luck, this is what most say, and it would be hard to keep track of, i like the top 5's and many of them, just dont want them so difficult to figure out, i dont have the time for all the time consuming ones, hope you understand, like your suggestions though and how you are thinking, keep it up
i disagree
the SE is a click voted by members within the click. they first 5 members to "join" were self nominated and serves no record to moniter or maintain.
I could set up " JR's super elite clan" today and nominate the first 5 players to join my own clan and than state they hold a record for being the first 5 to join.
I pick myself, Bilbo, Wild Tiger, Big Yuma and Jork. All quality team players and are not part of SE. So you can add that to your top 5 list.
your post also doesnt make sense. you have your self listed as 1 of the 5 players to join but yet your win percentage is over 70%. so how can you be a singles player if your win percentage is not under 40%?
also, Pedronicus has played mostly team games and only has a 52% win percentage. that is just simply horrible. If those are the players that are permitted to join SE than I would be embarrassed to be a part of it.
as for 1 vs 1 games being "too much luck", it doesnt matter. Persoanlly I think evey game played is luck. you never know what you opponent is going to do. you can only hope to out play him and beg for the dice to go your own way.
jr SE does not require they be singles players, the SE is great players all around but must be good at singles as well, well rounded, great at both, there is not a winning percentage for SE, just have to be great at singles and teams, i am not listed 1 thru 5 in singles bro, you may have misread.
the top 5 all time in singles is mm17, comic, rl orange, nuke, cyberdaniel with 40% and lower, the SE 1st 5 is pedro, robinette, blitz, scorba, eye, 2 different catergories, think you got confused, and when SE was introduced it was the players who were completely dominating the site at the time,
and it grew and many were involved with votes, etc, it was a big thing for awhile and back then many were posting with curiosity and anticipation including yourself, the 5 names you mentioned are great team players, no doubt, not at singles though, so any list you compile and anyone could do this now, really is too late, it is the original concept, one of its kind at the time and had much buzz, it was a collection of the best of the best way back when,
it is like 5 more could hit 3000 rank now and super, but it wouldnt matter for this list, cause this list has the 1st 5 to 3000, then top 5 scores, you see? anyways, we will just need to agree to disagree, you are on a few lists jr, so you should be happy
geez bro 
if you are mad at me, or robin, or pedro who is not here to defend himself or other SE members. so please dont spam this thread on SE or criticizing them, this is for 1st 5's and top 5's please, with all due respect, ty jr 
