HottBunnie wrote: Wed Nov 11, 2026 3:03 pm
Im unsure

but it seems Sonic is noting that Loose is a cooked goose and not on the menu ie hes not circle even though he is clearly acting like circle based on his wild accusations which to anyone who is trying to put it together could only come to the conclusion that he is trying to cover his trail or goose 🪿 like tail and attack the only people we know by the course of the game to be house.
I accused Devante of being scum like right of the bat based in his rhetoric and actions the vote had no support so when house wanted to try with another person i voted with house. And then when my suspicions were confirmed and there were no other valid suspicions available I put forth that Devante is guilty we voted he was not only circle but the only circle who can recruit. There is no circumstance where a circle would vote out the Patron if there are three circle members.
Annie claims archivists; questions the only other viable suspect after charle turns house and finds Dev is circle. We vote for Dev and he is circle and the Patron and someone from circle even voted against him to hide himself and since Sonic is seemingly suggesting Loose is off his rocker but actually still house then two circle members voted for Dev.
I think Loose looks guilty too but if Sonic is saying he is not really circle or if we knew Loose was circle our best course of action right now would be to determine who the circle member or members are that voted for Dev.
Also Loose Im sorry to say this directly but you are posting a bit too much and need to give others a chance to respond more often please. I really like what you are saying but I want to see what everyone has to say too.
Bunny,
(I started posting this as) I'm still thinking about how best to present things to give House best chance to avoid defeat and win.
Whilst your Sonic thing is supportive, I really don't think anything can be read into what Sonic is posting as to giving hidden clues about a players allegiance. Sonic is tongue in cheek humorous about state of the game and playing on what players are currently thinking.
Yes you were the first player to call out Devante and you did so logically and as it has turned out correctly.
Devante's response to that and I think only response to that prior to his hunting trip was in the post where he called you cute little Bunny.
(around here I diverted)So you have to consider whether there was a play which both was confirming you to be right and drawing you into a false alliance in doing so.
For calling out Dev before the archivist thing blew up and consistent with my belief that the game in a nutshell is around the archvist I call you as House.
Hjelp was under pressure Day1 for his play from others and my contribution in that was I can see Hjelp as Secretary (to Charle) but not as Patron.
Beginning Day2 Hjelps opening play was to throw shade on me for the Charle lynch and he doubled down by saying he somehow suspected Charle was Heir, and later clarified that he did so because of "House Applicant" element of what Charle said. House Applicant was referred to in my particular Usher card. House Applicant could be referred to on most or all orignally dealt cards either as Vanilla or power (such as Usher). House applicant does NOT justify Hjelp saying he thought Charle was Heir.
At a point in D1you Bunny were hot on the trail of Devante, and I was hot on the trail of Hjelp.
I call Hjelp as guilty.
Yes I can see I look guilty.
No the players not voting for Dev equating to being circle whilst I can see why you say that does not equate to me being guilty. Even if I was there had to be 1 other circle player actually on the Dev vote.
OK I have to accept posting too much (addictive getting immersed enthusiasm) and I do really like your really like bit hopefully because at least some of what I say is humorous to you? - thats the sense I'll take that as a compliment - Thanks.
Fp'd x2 by a shock vote from Charle - I'm off to work - that has blown my mind that Charle has a vote again!!!!