Civilitas High - Lesson 4: Arts

FOS: Dedicated those who can't get enough Mafia action. Ongoing Games located here!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
homer_jay
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:44 pm

Re: Civilitas High - Lesson 4: Arts

Post by homer_jay »

agreed. we can't go into this assuming we're down to 1 bad student because LC counts as one out of the three we expect. so let's not get ahead of ourselves and assume we have this in the bag...
Maxleod wrote: Sun Jul 26, 2026 3:42 pm I also think there's only one scumbag left so barring an zpic screwup we won
FOS
Champion of:

The Next Feudal Lord/Queen
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... &sk=t&sd=a

Supreme Feudal Doubles Tournament
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... &start=120
User avatar
Maxleod
Posts: 602
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 7:08 am
Location: DARDIS (Drunkness And Relative Dimensions In Sleep)

Re: Civilitas High - Lesson 4: Arts

Post by Maxleod »

Unvote

Vote homer_jay
User avatar
hjelp
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:50 pm

Re: Civilitas High - Lesson 4: Arts

Post by hjelp »

Max replaced Kingm and is one of the claimed wallflowers, on DDS’s wallflower-list
User avatar
kongming3
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:02 pm

Re: Civilitas High - Lesson 4: Arts

Post by kongming3 »

Claiming wallflower is not the same as being wallflower, can we please not blindly trust people who "revealed" their role of vanilla town day 1, especially at this stage of the game? And before anyone brings up the flavour knowledge claim, Ragian is an experienced player who is known to be anti-flavour nonsense and meta-gaming in that way. Scum would have been told of wallflowers or that they're fighting against the wallflowers or some such thing, we weren't just gifted five confirmed townsfolk (incredibly incredibly game breaking) simply because they knew the word wallflower.

On the topic of DDS, his suspicion of dev seems to line up with what I've seen both in the past, as well as today (both posts today by dev were more noncommittal yeah me too whatever you think is best posts that didn't commit to anything or add anything aka Follow the Leader). DDS being killed also shows direct intention by scum that they didn't want to keep him around. It's possible that scum just wanted to frame dev, but the simpler and probably more likely explanation is that a relatively trusted and active townsfolk (DDS) was expressing suspicion of someone (dev), and so had to be taken out.

Regarding Loose, he feels very clearly scum/scum-aligned to me, he sucks up to scum and knew of scum players, but did not reveal that information. I did go back and check the first page player post, however, and his role name is in black, rather than the red of scum or blue of town. Would give more substance to the idea of two scum left (because I'm not sure why he'd be distinguished as 3p otherwise), but he does still fulfill the same anti-town function regardless.
User avatar
Devante
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 1185
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:17 am
Location: Canada

Re: Civilitas High - Lesson 4: Arts

Post by Devante »

So why would I have voted for both scum players? As far as i'm concerned no one here is a confirmed wallflower
User avatar
kongming3
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:02 pm

Re: Civilitas High - Lesson 4: Arts

Post by kongming3 »

I'm very glad you brought that up Devante, since it got me to do some due diligence.
Ragian wrote: Thu Jul 23, 2026 12:40 am
Loose
Class suck-up
Welcome, Loose Canon. You are a the suck-up.
Suck-up: You are a good kid, but you suck up to the school baddies. You know who the school baddies are but they don't know who you are.
IT IS NOW RECESS 3
Scum did not know Loose was fellow/allied scum.

And the more interesting bit comes for Charle, the one known to be scum amongst scum.
Devante wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2026 11:42 am FOS on Loose as well. Charle is at 6 I think so won't hammer him, would like to hear from some others. Is this the lynch town is going with?
You were supposedly suspicious of Charle, were present and had the opportunity to put your money where your mouth is and get Charle lynched, and you balked and chose not to pull the trigger, and Charle lived another day as a direct result of you making that choice and the day ending shortly afterwards. That by itself doesn't make you scum, but it certainly doesn't give you town credit like you're claiming. Then the next day, homer points out how clearly suspicious Charle is.
homer_jay wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 9:32 pm ok. let's get some votes. besides your accidental Kingm vote.

i think LC's claim is weak. but charle's claim is an outright lie.

Vote Charle
Two posts afterwards you immediately jump in to push attention back on LC away from Charle.
Devante wrote: Thu Jul 02, 2026 1:17 am DDS you seem to be the most active and for better or worse that might work out for town but something isn't sitting right with an active player being so inactive so VOTE LC
And your very next post, without having unvoted, is to again vote LC and keep attention away from Charle
Devante wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2026 2:27 am YWh leaning this way for sure so again vote LC
You never shift your vote after that, or vote for Charle, and again, as far as a scum dev would know, Charle is his buddy and Loose is a convenient town patsy.

I don't think any of that conclusively proves you're scum dev, a town player could possibly have made the same choices, but your voting history shows the opposite of what you just claimed, and you still never responded to the point about your Follow the Leader posts.
Post Reply

Return to “Mafia Games”