Conquer Club

Closed josko.ri [ka]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Re: josko.ri

Postby ronsizzle on Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:41 am

it is the same thing as before. this guy just insults our intelligence at every level. i saw what he was doing, and he got upset because i would be messing with his master plan had i finished the games earlier. you will see his name at the top of the leaderboard if admin doesnt fix this issue that has been lingering for a few years now.

#badkittykitty
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ronsizzle
 
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm

Re: josko.ri

Postby BoganGod on Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:08 am

management don't care, management loves them some obsessive players.
#don'tkillkittens #kittensmatter
Image
Corporal BoganGod
 
Posts: 5873
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Heaven's Gate Retirement Home

Re: josko.ri

Postby josko.ri on Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:14 am

iAmCaffeine wrote:Now a captain. You're so proud you're delusional.

iAmCaffeine wrote:
josko.ri wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
josko.ri wrote:
Donelladan wrote:Well, I only meant, don't try to hide that losing tons of points is at your advantage, and that you are using this as a technique to get the most improved medal.
You said it anyway.

Losing points is not a goal, it is consequence or side effect of changing way of playing from complicated to simple maps. In one hand playing simpler maps is beneficial for getting medal hunting quickly (and that is why I am doing it) while in the other hand consequence of playing simple maps as Public games is losing many points because lower ranks join games.


Are you choosing the timing of when you switch from playing complicated to simple maps in such a way that you personally benefit from the timing?

I choose which maps I am playing based by my availability. For example, I start new job on May 1 so I played tons of simple maps in order to achieve Gold Polymorphic medal before that because after May 1 I will not have a lot of free time for CC anymore. I achieved my goal of getting Gold Polymorphic medal on April 30 and since then I will not make any new games on simple maps because my medal hunting goal is achieved.

I Don't think I will have enough free time in May to play complicated maps.

So on that basis, in May, you won't have enough time to get a medal on the most improved leaderboard. Let's see what happens.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 6#p4932746

I'm curious as to why you didn't mention this from beginning. Your initial reaction was to defend your actions. How peculiar.

I am sure that I will not start new games in first 2-3 weeks in May, besides the ones which I will play as part of my ongoing tournaments because I want to focus my time on new job.

Similar thing happened in March, when I increased my score by almost 2000 by winning these kind of games throughout the month:
- Won 3 Battle Royales
- Achieved 10 wins out of 19 games played in 12-player games (53% winning rate while expected winning rate is about 8% for 12-player games)
- Achieved 2 wins out of 4 games played in 8-player games (50% winning rate while expected winning rate is 12.5% for 8-player games)
- Achieved 4 wins out of 6 games played in 6-player games (67% winning rate while expected winning rate is 17% for 6-player games)
- Achieved 16 wins out of 18 games played (89%) in team games
- Achieved 59 wins out of 71 games played (83%) in 1v1 and Poly public Speed Games on Classic map

As you can see, I did not play any maps which are my "speciality" unless if you think my speciality is Classic map, or tournament games versus random opponents where it just happened that I had achieved excellent result in March.
For reference, the last my games played in March when I went from 3rd to 2nd place on Most Improved Scoreboard were these two games (check the timing, last hour of the month):
Game 17337465
Game 17337483
Now tell me, am I "Specialist" for Classic map, because it is obvious that I played speeders on that map when I wanted to increase my score in the last hour of the month? Also, I played that map 71 times throughout the month, which was my the most played map in March.
Image
User avatar
Major josko.ri
 
Posts: 4923
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:18 pm
366317111022

Re: josko.ri

Postby ronsizzle on Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:31 am

i think he loves the attention.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ronsizzle
 
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm

Re: josko.ri

Postby BoganGod on Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:46 am

ronc8649 wrote:i think he loves the attention.

Don't be a bigot, you may be misgendering josko. In the past josko has identified as male, in 2017 it pays to check before gendering people. josko has some achievements to be proud of. Whilst we are asking the rules to be enforced so he can't grossly abuse the spirit of the game, we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that josko has contributed a lot to the site. The site would be worse off without him.
#Savetomorrow'scats #kittensdeservetolive #kittenslivesmatter
Image
Corporal BoganGod
 
Posts: 5873
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Heaven's Gate Retirement Home

Re: josko.ri

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:13 am

I'm so impressed by your achievements in March josko. You won some battle royales and got a score influx, what a shocker. Not once in this thread or in GD have you actually made any kind of valid response to the accusation, btw. Stop denying people the medals they deserve by being pathetic, arrogant and selfish.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: josko.ri

Postby josko.ri on Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:34 am

iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm so impressed by your achievements in March josko. You won some battle royales and got a score influx, what a shocker. Not once in this thread or in GD have you actually made any kind of valid response to the accusation, btw. Stop denying people the medals they deserve by being pathetic, arrogant and selfish.

The accusation is not valid so that is why I cannot make valid response.
I still do not know for what I am accused. The best you could word your accusation is that I deliberately start my games on simple maps by the end of the month. My valid response to that accusation is that I am allowed to play any kind of games anytime, there is no restriction on the site about which kind of games can be started at which times and therefore I am not breaking any rule.

You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished ;)
Image
User avatar
Major josko.ri
 
Posts: 4923
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:18 pm
366317111022

Re: josko.ri

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:12 am

josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished ;)

Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.

As for the rest, my posts are extremely clear and the first is concise. You're just refusing to accept it because you have no argument. You're really transparent a lot of the time, though you don't seem to know it. Maybe you think you're so much smarter than others that they can't see through your bullshit and your real motives in the things you do.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: josko.ri

Postby josko.ri on Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:37 am

iAmCaffeine wrote:
josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished ;)

Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.

As for the rest, my posts are extremely clear and the first is concise. You're just refusing to accept it because you have no argument. You're really transparent a lot of the time, though you don't seem to know it. Maybe you think you're so much smarter than others that they can't see through your bullshit and your real motives in the things you do.

Of course you did not word your accusation better because I did not break any rule so naturally you are unable to prove what is my fault and for what should I be punished =D>

I played many 1v1 games with great winning rate of 63%. Am I guilty that CC scoring system is made on the way that someone who achieve 63% winning rate can lose points?
Image
User avatar
Major josko.ri
 
Posts: 4923
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:18 pm
366317111022

Re: josko.ri

Postby ronsizzle on Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:45 am

omg, i have heard it all. josko, do you realize that when i came back to cc in march. it was like the middle of march, and there was no maliciousness of medal hunting at all. i left over a year prior to that with a bad internet. you are intentionally abusing the scoring system. the worst part is, that you flaunt it.

you are a bad person. bad person never win. cc admin put stop to abuse of cc system. cc admin no give you medal. cc people no like you no longer. all cc hate man named josko.

#meowsbeforebrows
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ronsizzle
 
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm

Re: josko.ri

Postby BoganGod on Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:54 pm

josko.ri wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished ;)

Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.

As for the rest, my posts are extremely clear and the first is concise. You're just refusing to accept it because you have no argument. You're really transparent a lot of the time, though you don't seem to know it. Maybe you think you're so much smarter than others that they can't see through your bullshit and your real motives in the things you do.

Of course you did not word your accusation better because I did not break any rule so naturally you are unable to prove what is my fault and for what should I be punished =D>

I played many 1v1 games with great winning rate of 63%. Am I guilty that CC scoring system is made on the way that someone who achieve 63% winning rate can lose points?

josko guilty big time of taking advantage of system, system set up for player with honour, take advantage of system in mean way, have no honour, kitten killer have no honour, josko is kitten killer
#saveallcats #kittensdeservemercy #stopcatabuse #don'tharmpussies #begentilewithlittlepussies #kitten'slivesmatter #savetomorrow'scats
Image
Corporal BoganGod
 
Posts: 5873
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Heaven's Gate Retirement Home

Re: josko.ri

Postby eddie2 on Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:48 pm

ok don't like defending josko lol. but 66 out of 95 games are tourney/ clan games. some of the remaining 29 games are mixed wins and losses. so to me the thing does not look big enough to warrant the charge

Rules wrote:
Unwritten Rules

Obviously any gross abuse of the game is forbidden. This includes but is not limited to: throwing games or deliberately benefiting from thrown games, intentional deadbeating, holding players hostage, serial teammate killing, hijacking accounts, systematically "farming" new recruits and colluding with other players in any way to manipulate the scoring system.


where is the gross abuse ? others have had over 100 games waiting for this point increase. many people when medal chasing lose big points if not then u wouldn't call it medal chasing would you.

you need to learn when you are wrong mate and back down. like with the c and a you started via myself intentional throwing a game ?? but when the game was looked at I was in the lead. the charge you really were trying to get me for was intentionally not letting you win, but I thought that was the whole point not to let others win . but never mind.
no case to awnser lol
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: josko.ri

Postby Keefie on Mon May 01, 2017 2:27 am

I agree with eddie here.

There is no evidence of gross abuse.

Josko is timing his legitimate medal hunts over alternate months so that he can put himself in position for a Most Improved medal. There might be ethical arguments to be had, but I see absolutely no rule breaking going on.
Last edited by Keefie on Mon May 01, 2017 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Major Keefie
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:05 pm
Location: Sleepy Hollow
3

Re: josko.ri

Postby Donelladan on Mon May 01, 2017 2:38 am

Well, while I agree with you Keefie, ( there is no rule breaking, just unethical) eddie's post is inaccurate. There is way more that 95 games to consider.
I won't take my time counting, but josko went from general to capitaine, winning apparently ( he claimed so) 60-70% of his game on doodle and lux, so there is definitely more than 100 games to consider.
Image
User avatar
General Donelladan
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
5521839

Re: josko.ri

Postby maroshka851 on Mon May 01, 2017 2:54 am

well, you think climbing from a captain to a general in a month (no cheating, just winning normal games) is easy? you have to give him credit for that. i once was competing hard with him on the monthly leader, i did extremely well, but he beat me fair and square. he's got some paranoid thoughts, and some attitude. but he's one of the best players around. he's not a coward, and not violating the rules.
i'd hope for him to stop hunting the monthly ones. at least not every other month. but can't force him
Major maroshka851
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 7:46 pm
2

Re: josko.ri

Postby Lord Arioch on Mon May 01, 2017 5:53 am

Easy solution...u must take games i the order they come. I do...and it cost some...

Other than that hes bending the rules not breaking i n my opinion. Morally wrong legally right...

And yes hes one of the best here...why that shoumd matter? By the way i like him ;) hes never given me any attitude...other tha whooping my bottom some.
Same as caff by rhe way
User avatar
Captain Lord Arioch
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:43 am
Location: Mostly at work

Re: josko.ri

Postby eddie2 on Mon May 01, 2017 6:51 am

Donelladan wrote:Well, while I agree with you Keefie, ( there is no rule breaking, just unethical) eddie's post is inaccurate. There is way more that 95 games to consider.
I won't take my time counting, but josko went from general to capitaine, winning apparently ( he claimed so) 60-70% of his game on doodle and lux, so there is definitely more than 100 games to consider.

Donelladen. Only 29 games can count.
How many games did josko win last month ?
Did he lose them all ? No
Where are all the games he won ? Finished
He was medal chasing and got his medal. Have u ever medal chased donelladen ? When u are so high ranked it is easy to lose vast amount of points because you are playing lower ranks. So 30 point loss for a 7 point gain.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: josko.ri

Postby Donelladan on Mon May 01, 2017 7:46 am

eddie, I have no idea what you are talking about.
You said 29 games aren't enough to constitute a gross abuse, I am telling you there is definitely way more than 29 games, if we are speaking volume, quantity, there is enough games. That's all I said.
If you read my previous post again, you'll see that I said indeed that josko.ri didn't do anything wrong imho.

EDIT :

game finder, manual+ poly + luxembourg + doodle + josko.ri give 356 games, first one was played 15 february.

so it's not 29 games, it's 356 games. ( lost or won doesn't matter considering first post and what is describing Caff ).
Image
User avatar
General Donelladan
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
5521839

Re: joskok.ri

Postby eddie2 on Mon May 01, 2017 7:59 am

Yes but donelladen if he was doing the abuse you guys are saying then all his wins would be accumulating until today. This is not the case of all these games that he lost where is the evidence he threw them games there isnt any. So someone chased a medal lost a lot of points doing it, omg lets go back to before these new leaderboards and would there be a complaint about what he has done ?
All other cases were blatent abuse because they would finish losing games but keep all winni games running until the 1st of the month. So apart from clan and tourney games like i said josko has 29 active games left on the 1st of the month and these games have a mix of wins and losses, so this does not show any form of manipulating the score board.

There is also another rule that common sense prevails which obviously hasnt been used.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: josko.ri

Postby Donelladan on Mon May 01, 2017 8:12 am

Well, first, I am not accusing him of doing any abuse.
Second, you missunderstood the case.

The case isn't accusing him to delay win / speed loss in order to get a medal ( which is allowed by the way).
Here josko.ri is accused of gross abuse of the game, gross abuse being playing games that will make him lose points ( using the excuse of medal hunting) and stopping to hunt the medal 1st of the month in order to get the most improved medals.

Now let's be very clear, what I described above are facts.
By playing manual on doodle and lux, even trying to win,it's obvious josko will lose tons of points. And by stopping to play those games on the 1st of the month, he is then having a shot at the most improved medal.

Now the question is only, is it abuse or not ?

My point was it's not abused even if he is doing it in purpose because he can player whatever games he want whenever he want.
Caff ( and some other ) is that it is an abuse because he is preventing player that really improved at CC to get the medal ( or smthg like that).
Image
User avatar
General Donelladan
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
5521839

Re: josko.ri

Postby Extreme Ways on Mon May 01, 2017 8:33 am

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=220817

This should be the relevant case earlier in C&A.
After evaluating the facts for this case, and I do respect the points from all those who have defended the accused. I also believe that the accused are both one of the few solid players of the website. However, what can not be denied are the games mentioned in this report:
show


If there weren't any sort of game manipulation here, then there was at least an exploitation of when the games ended for the sole purpose of getting in the top ten monthly scoreboard. Even though there is no rule in "slowing" or quickly playing your turns, it's so easy to take control of how a game can be played out. It does look shady but still, for immediately comparing this with a past case involving a scheme that was done in a massive scale is still incomparable and the details of each case are different. Betiko simply wanted to catch up but to suddenly play several games with one player in one day and coincidentally winning many of them just in the nick of time - does look fishy. I strongly advise that for anyone who wants to catch up or improve their ranking on the monthly scoreboard, play with different people and play your games as honestly as one can.

No one is going to be removed or replaced from the monthly scoreboard out of this but this report should serve as a warning for the accused not to play like in those games again.

You could (not saying it will happen) apply the verdict to this case as well.
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
User avatar
General Extreme Ways
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am
2

Re: josko.ri

Postby rockfist on Mon May 01, 2017 8:38 am

I played two games on these settings against Josko. He had lower points than me and I knew it would probably result in point loss for me but we went 1-1. Both of us tried. I see no problem in what he is doing.
Image
User avatar
Brigadier rockfist
 
Posts: 2170
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:17 pm
Location: On the Wings of Death.
3222

Re: josko.ri

Postby iAmCaffeine on Mon May 01, 2017 8:47 am

Eddie, I'm going to politely request that you stop posting in this thread.

People are coming in here like "he still tries in his games" well yeah, so the f*ck what? How is that relevant? Have I said I think he's intentionally losing? No. Learn to read. How can you not think that doing this tactically to prevent worthy winners of the most improved medal, is not a gross abuse of the system? I really don't understand how anyone can think what he is doing is acceptable.

Like, there are people who genuinely deserve the most improved medals and who are players actually getting better at the game, and have worked hard to do so. Meanwhile you have this arrogant dickhead deliberately getting his score as low as possible by "legit" means, so that he can then shoot his score back up for another most improved medal. Has he improved? No.

rockfist wrote:I knew it would probably result in point loss for me but we went 1-1.

That is a point loss for you lol.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: josko.ri

Postby IcePack on Mon May 01, 2017 8:53 am

Sorry but I don't see anything wrong w what he's going. We all medal hunt at some point or another. We all aim for high scores now and then.
He's not delaying wins on a massive scale nor is he throwing any games or anything else. I don't wanna see it legislated what we can or can't play on our time here. It's just a medal people, get over it.
What josko has done is time his medal hunts vs normal play to a point that maximizes his medal output which frankly should be applauded.
I find this play a lot better then some of other recent C&A posts of this type for the monthly medal.
The only thing I really have any complaint about w how josko has handled himself is the C&A cases he brings against others. I'm 100% ok w him playing to win the medal, but it gets very old seeing a new C&A about someone beating him. If that stopped then I really don't have any problem w him trying.
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16661
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: josko.ri

Postby iAmCaffeine on Mon May 01, 2017 8:57 am

Man you people are fucking stupid.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users