Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
iAmCaffeine wrote:Now a captain. You're so proud you're delusional.iAmCaffeine wrote:josko.ri wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:josko.ri wrote:Donelladan wrote:Well, I only meant, don't try to hide that losing tons of points is at your advantage, and that you are using this as a technique to get the most improved medal.
You said it anyway.
Losing points is not a goal, it is consequence or side effect of changing way of playing from complicated to simple maps. In one hand playing simpler maps is beneficial for getting medal hunting quickly (and that is why I am doing it) while in the other hand consequence of playing simple maps as Public games is losing many points because lower ranks join games.
Are you choosing the timing of when you switch from playing complicated to simple maps in such a way that you personally benefit from the timing?
I choose which maps I am playing based by my availability. For example, I start new job on May 1 so I played tons of simple maps in order to achieve Gold Polymorphic medal before that because after May 1 I will not have a lot of free time for CC anymore. I achieved my goal of getting Gold Polymorphic medal on April 30 and since then I will not make any new games on simple maps because my medal hunting goal is achieved.
I Don't think I will have enough free time in May to play complicated maps.
So on that basis, in May, you won't have enough time to get a medal on the most improved leaderboard. Let's see what happens.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 6#p4932746
I'm curious as to why you didn't mention this from beginning. Your initial reaction was to defend your actions. How peculiar.
ronc8649 wrote:i think he loves the attention.
iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm so impressed by your achievements in March josko. You won some battle royales and got a score influx, what a shocker. Not once in this thread or in GD have you actually made any kind of valid response to the accusation, btw. Stop denying people the medals they deserve by being pathetic, arrogant and selfish.
josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished
iAmCaffeine wrote:josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished
Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.
As for the rest, my posts are extremely clear and the first is concise. You're just refusing to accept it because you have no argument. You're really transparent a lot of the time, though you don't seem to know it. Maybe you think you're so much smarter than others that they can't see through your bullshit and your real motives in the things you do.
josko.ri wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished
Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.
As for the rest, my posts are extremely clear and the first is concise. You're just refusing to accept it because you have no argument. You're really transparent a lot of the time, though you don't seem to know it. Maybe you think you're so much smarter than others that they can't see through your bullshit and your real motives in the things you do.
Of course you did not word your accusation better because I did not break any rule so naturally you are unable to prove what is my fault and for what should I be punished
I played many 1v1 games with great winning rate of 63%. Am I guilty that CC scoring system is made on the way that someone who achieve 63% winning rate can lose points?
Rules wrote:
Unwritten Rules
Obviously any gross abuse of the game is forbidden. This includes but is not limited to: throwing games or deliberately benefiting from thrown games, intentional deadbeating, holding players hostage, serial teammate killing, hijacking accounts, systematically "farming" new recruits and colluding with other players in any way to manipulate the scoring system.
Donelladan wrote:Well, while I agree with you Keefie, ( there is no rule breaking, just unethical) eddie's post is inaccurate. There is way more that 95 games to consider.
I won't take my time counting, but josko went from general to capitaine, winning apparently ( he claimed so) 60-70% of his game on doodle and lux, so there is definitely more than 100 games to consider.
After evaluating the facts for this case, and I do respect the points from all those who have defended the accused. I also believe that the accused are both one of the few solid players of the website. However, what can not be denied are the games mentioned in this report:
If there weren't any sort of game manipulation here, then there was at least an exploitation of when the games ended for the sole purpose of getting in the top ten monthly scoreboard. Even though there is no rule in "slowing" or quickly playing your turns, it's so easy to take control of how a game can be played out. It does look shady but still, for immediately comparing this with a past case involving a scheme that was done in a massive scale is still incomparable and the details of each case are different. Betiko simply wanted to catch up but to suddenly play several games with one player in one day and coincidentally winning many of them just in the nick of time - does look fishy. I strongly advise that for anyone who wants to catch up or improve their ranking on the monthly scoreboard, play with different people and play your games as honestly as one can.
No one is going to be removed or replaced from the monthly scoreboard out of this but this report should serve as a warning for the accused not to play like in those games again.
rockfist wrote:I knew it would probably result in point loss for me but we went 1-1.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users