Dukasaur wrote:I think this deserves to be rescued. I will rescue this.
Thank you, privileges transferred.
Moderator: Tournament Directors
Dukasaur wrote:I think this deserves to be rescued. I will rescue this.
Dukasaur wrote:Subject: ATP Open Australia Random Doubles (1/4 Final) [RESCUED]
Re: the messed-up score in Set of your match.Dukasaur wrote:
bamage+TX AG 90 vs. Big jumbo+ironsij0287
(score previously recorded incorrectly)
correct score 5-4, 6-8, 4-4
set 1 score was previously recorded as 6-4, giving bamage and TX the win. 5-4 does not satisfy the minimum separation of 2 games. Another game will be needed in set 1, as well as at least 2 games in set 3.
Okay, so next steps are:Starting new games in the Quarter-Final will wait a bit for the other groups to catch up. A general PM will go out, but I'll also be sending some specific PMs to some of you regarding the issues above.
- Find out the settings for the three players who failed to post them
- talk to TX etc. about the messed up score for their Round 2 match-up
- check out why Cump Sherman and UCAbears are listed as "ff" in the OP. (I assume that ff means "forfeit" but no reason was given for the forfeit in the thread, so I won't consider it official until I talk to the players involved.)
- Start new games in the Round 2 unfinished business
Please discuss this and get back to me Asap.
TX AG 90 wrote:Hi duk,
I think your counting is wrong.
We have played 32 games against each other, so 6-4, 8-6, 4-4 adds up.
Also, we won Round 2, Set 1, Game 10 - which gave us a 6-4 victory. https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=16457653
Please double check both your findings and mine.
Thanks,
TX
TX AG 90 wrote:Hi duk,
I figured out the issue.
The linked game was accidentally logged into this tournament: ATP Random Doubles: Bournemouth.
However, if you check the chat log, it was supposed to be for AUS.
Thanks,
TX
jaxdadio wrote:parachute, fog, no trench
Cump Sherman wrote:Just read your entire note. This was so long ago. This may have been the tournament that had no rules for not responding to invites. If so, I remember that for one of the sets, the chair had to invite our opponent 3 times before he accepted. Given that, I don't see how we could have a forfeit. But on the other hand, maybe I got tired of the 'no rules' and just decided to drop this tournament due to stupidity. Maybe, UCA remembers better.
UCAbears wrote:I honestly cannot remember correctly, Duk.
Dukasaur wrote:UCAbears missed his invite.
Other games in this week's batch have begun, as detailed in the rescue post above.
Dukasaur wrote:
bamage no spoils, fog chained, trench
TX AG 90 no spoils, fog chained, trench
vs.
Big jumbo nuke, fog adjacent, trench
ironsij0287 flat rate, fog chained, NO trench
6-4, 6-8, 4-6
Dukasaur wrote:Looks like the epic battle between bamage/TX AG 90 and Big jumbo/ironsij0287 has come to an end, with the latter team pulling out a win.Dukasaur wrote:
bamage no spoils, fog chained, trench
TX AG 90 no spoils, fog chained, trench
vs.
Big jumbo nuke, fog adjacent, trench
ironsij0287 flat rate, fog chained, NO trench
6-4, 6-8, 4-6
Active games continue in the other 2 matchups.
Mad777 wrote:This tournament is still active, no ongoing game as of yet.
Dukasaur wrote:M V 3/Edicus_Rex vs. iAmCaffeine/gmq.
Current score 4-2 for M V 3 team.
Next 2 games
Game 16990202
Game 16990205
Users browsing this forum: No registered users