Butters1919 wrote:owenshooter wrote:seeing as how you add very little to the forums, other than to kill others brain cells (from reading your posts). i highly doubt you have ever read any of the C&A threads concerning "hacking" or that you even read this thread. you have always been a marginal member of little to no merit within the forums, so it is nice to see you staying consistent...-BJ
I'm just killing the superfluous ones.
I read most C&A reports. Some for entertainment, some to see how the site is being policed. I just don't care if someone uses slightly incorrect terminology. The message is clear, and that's all that really matters (to me).
Like you, I read C&A partly for entertainment and partly for insight into how the site is policed.
To me, the people who scream "I've been hacked! I've been hacked!" are not a simple matter of using "slightly incorrect terminology." They are (in most cases, and begging the pardon of the small number of exceptions) people who are too catastrophically lazy to devise strong passwords. It only takes a few minutes to devise a password that will survive anything short of a full-blown KGB attack, and yet it's mind-blowing how many people's password is "1234".
Add to that the people who will:
- announce their password in open chat
- PM their password to a random stranger
- post their password on someone's wall
- put their password in a file to be shared with their entire clan, including some people they know but many people they don't
and it's a prescription for chaos.
People who share their accounts with people they barely know and then scream "I've been hacked!" are not just making a minor mistake in nomenclature. They are expecting someone else to clean up the mess they caused with their own stupidity and laziness.