Rook and nogaman [Cleared]

Hatchman · Post by **Hatchman** » Sun May 27, 2007 5:42 am

suspected users: Rook and nogaman

Game 429754

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=429754#gmtop

Rook and nogaman have been working in unison the entire game, but never conversing in chat. They rarely attack each other, and often complement or miror each other's moves. At this point, Rook is so confident that nogaman will not attack him that he has left 1 army on Galway against nogaman's 16 and moved everything north.

Hatchman · Post by **Hatchman** » Sun May 27, 2007 5:45 am

If this situation is par for the course, then excuse my naivete please.

podge · Post by **podge** » Sun May 27, 2007 6:10 am

I don't really see any evidence of collusion. In a 3 player game there will always appear to be an alliance as the two weaker players should always concentrate on the strongest. As to the 16 against 1, red can't defend that anyway so might just as well leave a 1 on it.

Hatchman · Post by **Hatchman** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:59 am

Yeah my best mate agrees with you. But I am no stronger than green, so why is red defending only against me? I guess I am perplexed

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun May 27, 2007 9:16 am

areyouincahoots isn't a multi!

Atilla · Post by **Atilla** » Sun May 27, 2007 9:45 am

and how would you know? you don't play.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun May 27, 2007 9:47 am

Atilla wrote:and how would you know? you don't play.

Yes I do. I'm in 40 games now, and I've almost completed 400. I don't know where you get your information from…

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Sun May 27, 2007 12:59 pm

hecter wrote:areyouincahoots isn't a multi!

She isn't even mentioned in this thread, please go back to spamalot and take your crap with you. ---->

Hatchman · Post by **Hatchman** » Sun May 27, 2007 1:36 pm

Yeah i wasn't referring to anyone named areyouincahoots LOL. That was sheer coincidence. The players I'm questioning here are Rook and nogaman.

If I'm wrong in my suspicions, I apologize to both these players. But I have a very strong gut feeling. The entire game has seemed quite fishy and quite well-orchestrated from their end, but in a very covert way.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun May 27, 2007 1:56 pm

hatchman wrote:Yeah i wasn't referring to anyone named areyouincahoots LOL. That was sheer coincidence. The players I'm questioning here are Rook and nogaman.

If I'm wrong in my suspicions, I apologize to both these players. But I have a very strong gut feeling. The entire game has seemed quite fishy and quite well-orchestrated from their end, but in a very covert way.

Well, I read the game chat, and if they are teaming up against you, they do it quite well. It wouldn't surprise me if they are, but it wouldn't surprise me if they aren't.

As they've only played one other game together, and in it Rook took out nogoman first, I'm leaning towards no. I think you have a game of coincidences.

comic boy · Post by **comic boy** » Sun May 27, 2007 11:46 pm

Impossible to say if anything is underhand as this sort of thing will always happen in 3 player game and the border move actually makes sense to me. As I repeatedly have told you its time for you to move on and play big boy escalating games - we never cheat

Hatchman · Post by **Hatchman** » Mon May 28, 2007 12:45 pm

LOL Time for me to bite the bullet huh Comic?

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Mon May 28, 2007 2:04 pm

Rook and nogaman are cleared of being multis.