Moderator: Community Team
11-5 this time around, I'm moving in the right direction. 19-13 overall.Frigidus wrote:NYJ @ NE
STL @ ATL
CLE @ BAL
CAR @ BUF The Panthers fail me again, I've clearly given them far too much credit.
MIN @ CHI
WAS @ GB
TEN @ HOU
MIA @ IND
DAL @ KC
SD @ PHI
DET @ ARI
NO @ TB
DEN @ NYG
JAC @ OAK Big matchup in the battle for the #1 pick
SF @ SEA
PIT @ CIN
Lootifer wrote: BUF @ NYJ
Got that right...Lootifer wrote:I have no idea what im doing
Actually reading some stuff, I reckon my IND@SF pick is waaaaay worse.Army of GOD wrote:Lootifer wrote: BUF @ NYJGot that right...Lootifer wrote:I have no idea what im doing
This season has already shown that no picks are safe,Lootifer wrote:I'm gonna leave them as is
Wow, what the f*ck?Frigidus wrote:So the Colts traded a first rounder to the Browns for Trent Richardson. I still think San Fran wins that game, but it definitely makes things interesting. I'm very happy I'm not a Browns fan. Maybe they're hoping this move will make them suck so badly they end up with the first pick of the draft this year?
Dive in dude! STL @ DAL ... I hope you're wrong about this one.UselessTriviaMan wrote:I realize I'm coming in late, but may I include my picks?
I loathe the Chiefs and am a Vick fan so hopefully the Eagles win. It's definitely going to be high scoring mostly because the Eagles' speed of plays means that there will be a lot of possessions.thegreekdog wrote:Joe... Banner...
I guess it makes sense, all things considered.
I think the Chiefs win tomorrow, and I'm not just saying that as a disgruntled Eagles fan. The Eagles defense is really bad (and I bet historically bad when all is said and done), especially the secondary, and if I know Andy Reid (after spending 14 years with him), he likes to pass the ball. I'm also worried the Eagles players will press a little when they're under the lights against Big Red. I think it will be a tight, high scoring affair, with a couple of Vick turnovers: 35-33.
That being said, it will probably end up 13-10 like Pats-Jets.
If they don't just give them away to the Chiefs.Army of GOD wrote:Eagles' speed of plays means that there will be a lot of possessions.
I'm actually wondering whether Reid will slow the pace of offense down similar to what San Diego did (to great effect last Sunday).Army of GOD wrote:I loathe the Chiefs and am a Vick fan so hopefully the Eagles win. It's definitely going to be high scoring mostly because the Eagles' speed of plays means that there will be a lot of possessions.thegreekdog wrote:Joe... Banner...
I guess it makes sense, all things considered.
I think the Chiefs win tomorrow, and I'm not just saying that as a disgruntled Eagles fan. The Eagles defense is really bad (and I bet historically bad when all is said and done), especially the secondary, and if I know Andy Reid (after spending 14 years with him), he likes to pass the ball. I'm also worried the Eagles players will press a little when they're under the lights against Big Red. I think it will be a tight, high scoring affair, with a couple of Vick turnovers: 35-33.
That being said, it will probably end up 13-10 like Pats-Jets.
It does make sense, but not in the context of that particular game. The Chargers played "dink and dunk" football, with no real big plays and the defense got them in third down positions a lot. If the defense was looking to place blame on being on the field for a long period of time, it can look in the mirror. If you have a team in 3rd and 8 and you can't get the stop, that's on the defense, not on the offense.Timminz wrote:That sort of makes sense though, since a bad defense becomes a bigger factor with a fast offense.
The NFC East has faced some surprisingly good pass defense, victimized themselves with sloppy play, turnovers and untimely penalties.Frigidus wrote:Philly has fallen off very quickly after such an encouraging first week. Who would have thought the NFC East would be so unimpressive?
