Moderator: Community Team
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.

Yeah. I never counted on this many power roles to be dead before the d2 lynch.rishaed wrote:well the infighting didn't take that long. One confirmed lawful (good?) char, who just murdured someone....
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Agreed, fighting at this point is most likely just going to help E/C. That being said, I don't blame day killing safari...honestly, I had all but pegged him as the Cult recruiter reading the statements and I can see how a lawful thought it was a good use of ability but yeah. Let's focus on the cult right now.anamainiacks wrote:What in the world just happened... I believed MoB at the end of page 30, then I saw the Day Kill on page 31... Guess we can at least know for sure that MoB is a Mason. Can we please leave the Lawful-Chaotic infighting till later in the game? We have bigger fish to fry at this point.
This mess just keeps getting messier...need more than a broom to clean it up.Anyway here's what we have so far:
Roles/Claims
1. gregwolf121 ~ Elian Duskwalker ~ Watcher ~ Good/Neutral Elf Ranger
2. MoB Deadly ~ ??? ~ Mason with safariguy5; Davmorn Loyalar must be dead for him to win ~ ???/???
3. ??? ~ Davmorn Loyalar ~ at least 1 DK ~ ???/Lawful ??? Paladin
4. TheForgivenOne - Roleblocked N1
Dead
1. betiko ~ Nerisella Rubymace ~ Cop ~ Good/Neutral Dwarf Rogue - Modkilled D1
2. jonty125 ~ Jamorin Lightouch ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Gnome Rogue (claimed Neutral/Lawful Gnome Regional Traveler) - Lynched D1
3. new guy1 ~ Yenhand Silverkin ~ ???/??? - NKed N1
4. safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT (2 BP vests, NK, track, investigate); Mason with MoB Deadly ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger - DKed by Davmorn Loyalar D2
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Sort of moot now, but I just assumed opposites. Not necessarily true, but I don't think they'd have same abilities.anamainiacks wrote:Saf has a NK as well, so not necessarily...
Agreed, there are very various strategies all WIFOM mostly.DoomYoshi wrote:If he thought he was being watched, and claims a roleblock, that sets up the cult recruiter as a town roleblocker in the eyes of town. I have tried a very similar move.
Also, why am I shy?
This. There's going to be plenty of time to sort out "lawful" versus "chaotic" - cult is number one priority, the other evil guys are the 2nd priority.strike wolf wrote:Agreed, fighting at this point is most likely just going to help E/C. That being said, I don't blame day killing safari...honestly, I had all but pegged him as the Cult recruiter reading the statements and I can see how a lawful thought it was a good use of ability but yeah. Let's focus on the cult right now.
Correct. Unless Paladins are lawfully good, they lose all of their abilities and can't do anything, so the kill was done by a LAWFULLY GOOD character which indicates town.StubbsKVM wrote:Baldur's Gate-wise, Paladins are always Lawful Good.
Not sure it's the same in D&D.
A Lawfully Good paladin who is suspect to cult recruitment at any time unfortunately.Commander9 wrote: Correct. Unless Paladins are lawfully good, they lose all of their abilities and can't do anything, so the kill was done by a LAWFULLY GOOD character which indicates town.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Aren't we all, tho? In a way, it's great that he's not known so he could possibly use his ability again (assuming non 1-shot) to execute with good judgement, but a recruited day killer.. Yeah, ugh.MoB Deadly wrote:A Lawfully Good paladin who is suspect to cult recruitment at any time unfortunately.

That may have made some sense if greg hadnt already announced that no one had visited his target.DoomYoshi wrote:Why not?Nebuchadnezer wrote: Wow, Safari, I'm not even sure where you're going with this. You are saying that because TFO claims a roleblock, that he was in fact recruited instead? I don't follow this logic. If he was recruited, doesn't he just say nothing about his power? Or are you saying that he was afraid that after being recruited, Greg might have been watching him, and therefore instead of cult recruiter being outted, it's simply a town roleblocker?
If he thought he was being watched, and claims a roleblock, that sets up the cult recruiter as a town roleblocker in the eyes of town. I have tried a very similar move.
Also, why am I shy?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Ok, you are right, good point. I guess I don't have to defend safariguy's train of thought anymore since he is dead.strike wolf wrote:That may have made some sense if greg hadnt already announced that no one had visited his target.DoomYoshi wrote:Why not?Nebuchadnezer wrote: Wow, Safari, I'm not even sure where you're going with this. You are saying that because TFO claims a roleblock, that he was in fact recruited instead? I don't follow this logic. If he was recruited, doesn't he just say nothing about his power? Or are you saying that he was afraid that after being recruited, Greg might have been watching him, and therefore instead of cult recruiter being outted, it's simply a town roleblocker?
If he thought he was being watched, and claims a roleblock, that sets up the cult recruiter as a town roleblocker in the eyes of town. I have tried a very similar move.
Also, why am I shy?
I have been posting once per night after work. While I do read throughout the day, I won't be posting much more than once per day (I hate posting on my phone). In fact, I had just posted 3.5 hours before you calling me shy...but, whatevs. Here's my post for the day...Commander9 wrote:Also, I'd like to get a bit more input and contributions from some of our shy colleagues over there, namely Yoshi, epitaph, neb, dazza, skillful and Rodion/Mob (to a lesser extent).
Thank you for the recap Anamaniacks...however, the Mason part of Safariguy's claim is, in fact, not confirmed.anamainiacks wrote:What in the world just happened... I believed MoB at the end of page 30, then I saw the Day Kill on page 31... Guess we can at least know for sure that MoB is a Mason. Can we please leave the Lawful-Chaotic infighting till later in the game? We have bigger fish to fry at this point.
Anyway here's what we have so far:
Roles/Claims
1. gregwolf121 ~ Elian Duskwalker ~ Watcher ~ Good/Neutral Elf Ranger
2. MoB Deadly ~ ??? ~ Mason with safariguy5; Davmorn Loyalar must be dead for him to win ~ ???/???
3. ??? ~ Davmorn Loyalar ~ at least 1 DK ~ ???/Lawful ??? Paladin
4. TheForgivenOne - Roleblocked N1
Dead
1. betiko ~ Nerisella Rubymace ~ Cop ~ Good/Neutral Dwarf Rogue - Modkilled D1
2. jonty125 ~ Jamorin Lightouch ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Gnome Rogue (claimed Neutral/Lawful Gnome Regional Traveler) - Lynched D1
3. new guy1 ~ Yenhand Silverkin ~ ???/??? - NKed N1
4. safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT (2 BP vests, NK, track, investigate); Mason with MoB Deadly ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger - DKed by Davmorn Loyalar D2
edocsil wrote: Safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger has been daykilled.
15 alive 8 to hang.
Using a terrible argument to try to turn us against the Paladin? Anyone can be recruited.MoB Deadly wrote:A Lawfully Good paladin who is suspect to cult recruitment at any time unfortunately.Commander9 wrote: Correct. Unless Paladins are lawfully good, they lose all of their abilities and can't do anything, so the kill was done by a LAWFULLY GOOD character which indicates town.
Does this mean that Skillfusniper33 will be going after MoB, who is likely Neutral/Chaotic? Interesting choice of words here.skillfusniper33 wrote:Why I didn't have a vote at the end of the day? If I remember my thought process correctly I didn't like either case, and after re-reading that there would be a lynch with the most votes I didn't see a way for the No lynch to make a rally to catch up. Hence me not voting.
Probably a reason for jonty to lie about being chaotic, would be he saw it as an instant lynch. I know I would have jumped on that pretty quickly overall, as many others would. IMO Chaotic seems to me to be mafia based, maybe that should be evil. Now that I start to really separate the 2 classes I come to the opposite opinion that chaotic can't be controlled, and they will be doing as they wish.
I disagree with stubs being mafia based off of SW's case. I just played a game with him and he had the same posting pattern. Yes it drove me crazy, but bringing experience from the play style it is the same.
If they weren't truly Masons, why would MoB bother confirming their Masonry? He'd instead believe Saf to be lying about his alignment and get the rest of us to throw our votes on him. There is far too much detail about their Masonry for me to say it was all a lie (details of their conversation, etc). The possibility is definitely still out there, but I think chances are slim.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Thank you for the recap Anamaniacks...however, the Mason part of Safariguy's claim is, in fact, not confirmed.
edocsil wrote: Safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger has been daykilled.
15 alive 8 to hang.
Show me where "Mason" is listed? In fact, this would lead me to believe that they were not masons.
Hadn't we sort of come to a consensus on D1 that E/L and E/N are our mafia, and E/C is the cult?Nebuchadnezer wrote:What I can't figure is if they are all a loosely affiliated "mafia" in this game...which I can't make a case for or against. (I still lean toward the ?/Evils being mafia.)
I disagree. I understand where he's coming from if he thought that Saf was the Cult Leader, but he could have waited till more details and information had turned up. I'll admit that I too thought Saf might have been the Cult Leader and MoB the Cultist, but there wasn't enough solid evidence to say this, and their responses would've been useful in determining the validity of the train of thought. So yea, I think the kill was premature; it's not like the day was going to end soon.Nebuchadnezer wrote:I think the Paladin made the right choice. Saf just wasn't adding up, and still doesn't add up. If he was going to take a shot at one player who was suspicious enough to be the recruiter, it was Saf.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Safariguy isn't a "mason" though.strike wolf wrote:Pretty much agreeing with everything Anamaniacks said. If they weren't masons it would have been a big stretch for Saf to say it and I can't see any good reason why he did.
I may take another look into Aage. He hasn't really given me scum vibes that much but with as many people seeming to feel he's scummy it is possible I missed something.
Then why claim it, it's the only bit of his role we haven't had confirmed and all other evidence supports it. It's not confirmed, but it's highly likely.DoomYoshi wrote:Safariguy isn't a "mason" though.strike wolf wrote:Pretty much agreeing with everything Anamaniacks said. If they weren't masons it would have been a big stretch for Saf to say it and I can't see any good reason why he did.
I may take another look into Aage. He hasn't really given me scum vibes that much but with as many people seeming to feel he's scummy it is possible I missed something.
But jonty and saf voted for MoB. So does the logic still hold? And if you think they're the "mafia" why not vote for MoB now and eliminate 3 "mafia"?DoomYoshi wrote:Neither saf nor MoB voted jonty. The Chaotic Neutrals are probably the "mafia".
It was a mistake, see the following posts. Skimming much?DoomYoshi wrote:Stubbz does have a double vote. Both were counted.
I smell fish.
vote stubbz
anamainiacks wrote:edocsil - Final VC wrote:Jonty (7) ~ Newguy, Epitaph, tfo, stubbs, Dazza, Neb, Stubbs
Mob (5)~ aage, newguy, DoomYoshi, jonty, Saf
No Lynch (3) ~ mob, rishaed, Gregwolfedocsil wrote:Those VC's are as accurate as I can get them. Sometimes I miss a vote, and then I go back and edit them when I am told.All this doesn't add up... and what Stubbs is saying directly contradicts edoc. Sorry to bug you edoc, but can we can confirmation on the Day 1 VC again?StubbsKVM wrote:Well, I have no double vote. I suppose that was a mistake on edoc's behalf.
And still would like this answered:edocsil wrote:Anam, clearly it was a mistake. No, I am not going to recount it, because
A: It doesn't mater
B: It's a total waste of my time, that day is over
C: If there are vote shenanigans going on the result is almost always a ???
D: Every single VC has had a minor mistake in it. I have a very hard time doing them accurately, and I'm not sure why. I go through the posts line by line and then double check them once I'm done. I typically do the VCs at night once I get be from class and I tend to have a few beers. It likely doesn't help accuracy.
In all, you seem to be throwing your vote around for pretty weak reasons today... FOS DoomYoshi.anamainiacks wrote:I'm confused - how does voting for TFO increase the chances of knowing what the action is? If you're referring to TFO's action, it wouldn't have been performed, since he was supposedly roleblocked, no?DoomYoshi wrote:If you were cult, who would you want on your team?
In other news, vote TFO since now I am dying to know what the action from last night is.