Moderator: Community Team
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
rishaed wrote:well the infighting didn't take that long. One confirmed lawful (good?) char, who just murdured someone....
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this
anamainiacks wrote:What in the world just happened... I believed MoB at the end of page 30, then I saw the Day Kill on page 31... Guess we can at least know for sure that MoB is a Mason. Can we please leave the Lawful-Chaotic infighting till later in the game? We have bigger fish to fry at this point.
Anyway here's what we have so far:
Roles/Claims
1. gregwolf121 ~ Elian Duskwalker ~ Watcher ~ Good/Neutral Elf Ranger
2. MoB Deadly ~ ??? ~ Mason with safariguy5; Davmorn Loyalar must be dead for him to win ~ ???/???
3. ??? ~ Davmorn Loyalar ~ at least 1 DK ~ ???/Lawful ??? Paladin
4. TheForgivenOne - Roleblocked N1
Dead
1. betiko ~ Nerisella Rubymace ~ Cop ~ Good/Neutral Dwarf Rogue - Modkilled D1
2. jonty125 ~ Jamorin Lightouch ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Gnome Rogue (claimed Neutral/Lawful Gnome Regional Traveler) - Lynched D1
3. new guy1 ~ Yenhand Silverkin ~ ???/??? - NKed N1
4. safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT (2 BP vests, NK, track, investigate); Mason with MoB Deadly ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger - DKed by Davmorn Loyalar D2
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
anamainiacks wrote:Saf has a NK as well, so not necessarily...
DoomYoshi wrote:If he thought he was being watched, and claims a roleblock, that sets up the cult recruiter as a town roleblocker in the eyes of town. I have tried a very similar move.
Also, why am I shy?
strike wolf wrote:Agreed, fighting at this point is most likely just going to help E/C. That being said, I don't blame day killing safari...honestly, I had all but pegged him as the Cult recruiter reading the statements and I can see how a lawful thought it was a good use of ability but yeah. Let's focus on the cult right now.
StubbsKVM wrote:Baldur's Gate-wise, Paladins are always Lawful Good.
Not sure it's the same in D&D.
Commander9 wrote:Correct. Unless Paladins are lawfully good, they lose all of their abilities and can't do anything, so the kill was done by a LAWFULLY GOOD character which indicates town.
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this
MoB Deadly wrote:A Lawfully Good paladin who is suspect to cult recruitment at any time unfortunately.
DoomYoshi wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:Wow, Safari, I'm not even sure where you're going with this. You are saying that because TFO claims a roleblock, that he was in fact recruited instead? I don't follow this logic. If he was recruited, doesn't he just say nothing about his power? Or are you saying that he was afraid that after being recruited, Greg might have been watching him, and therefore instead of cult recruiter being outted, it's simply a town roleblocker?
Why not?
If he thought he was being watched, and claims a roleblock, that sets up the cult recruiter as a town roleblocker in the eyes of town. I have tried a very similar move.
Also, why am I shy?
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:Wow, Safari, I'm not even sure where you're going with this. You are saying that because TFO claims a roleblock, that he was in fact recruited instead? I don't follow this logic. If he was recruited, doesn't he just say nothing about his power? Or are you saying that he was afraid that after being recruited, Greg might have been watching him, and therefore instead of cult recruiter being outted, it's simply a town roleblocker?
Why not?
If he thought he was being watched, and claims a roleblock, that sets up the cult recruiter as a town roleblocker in the eyes of town. I have tried a very similar move.
Also, why am I shy?
That may have made some sense if greg hadnt already announced that no one had visited his target.
Commander9 wrote:Also, I'd like to get a bit more input and contributions from some of our shy colleagues over there, namely Yoshi, epitaph, neb, dazza, skillful and Rodion/Mob (to a lesser extent).
anamainiacks wrote:What in the world just happened... I believed MoB at the end of page 30, then I saw the Day Kill on page 31... Guess we can at least know for sure that MoB is a Mason. Can we please leave the Lawful-Chaotic infighting till later in the game? We have bigger fish to fry at this point.
Anyway here's what we have so far:
Roles/Claims
1. gregwolf121 ~ Elian Duskwalker ~ Watcher ~ Good/Neutral Elf Ranger
2. MoB Deadly ~ ??? ~ Mason with safariguy5; Davmorn Loyalar must be dead for him to win ~ ???/???
3. ??? ~ Davmorn Loyalar ~ at least 1 DK ~ ???/Lawful ??? Paladin
4. TheForgivenOne - Roleblocked N1
Dead
1. betiko ~ Nerisella Rubymace ~ Cop ~ Good/Neutral Dwarf Rogue - Modkilled D1
2. jonty125 ~ Jamorin Lightouch ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Gnome Rogue (claimed Neutral/Lawful Gnome Regional Traveler) - Lynched D1
3. new guy1 ~ Yenhand Silverkin ~ ???/??? - NKed N1
4. safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT (2 BP vests, NK, track, investigate); Mason with MoB Deadly ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger - DKed by Davmorn Loyalar D2
edocsil wrote:Safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger has been daykilled.
15 alive 8 to hang.
MoB Deadly wrote:Commander9 wrote:Correct. Unless Paladins are lawfully good, they lose all of their abilities and can't do anything, so the kill was done by a LAWFULLY GOOD character which indicates town.
A Lawfully Good paladin who is suspect to cult recruitment at any time unfortunately.
skillfusniper33 wrote:Why I didn't have a vote at the end of the day? If I remember my thought process correctly I didn't like either case, and after re-reading that there would be a lynch with the most votes I didn't see a way for the No lynch to make a rally to catch up. Hence me not voting.
Probably a reason for jonty to lie about being chaotic, would be he saw it as an instant lynch. I know I would have jumped on that pretty quickly overall, as many others would. IMO Chaotic seems to me to be mafia based, maybe that should be evil. Now that I start to really separate the 2 classes I come to the opposite opinion that chaotic can't be controlled, and they will be doing as they wish.
I disagree with stubs being mafia based off of SW's case. I just played a game with him and he had the same posting pattern. Yes it drove me crazy, but bringing experience from the play style it is the same.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Thank you for the recap Anamaniacks...however, the Mason part of Safariguy's claim is, in fact, not confirmed.edocsil wrote:Safariguy5 ~ Iangeon Swordhand ~ JOAT ~ Neutral/Chaotic Half-Elf Ranger has been daykilled.
15 alive 8 to hang.
Show me where "Mason" is listed? In fact, this would lead me to believe that they were not masons.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:What I can't figure is if they are all a loosely affiliated "mafia" in this game...which I can't make a case for or against. (I still lean toward the ?/Evils being mafia.)
Nebuchadnezer wrote:I think the Paladin made the right choice. Saf just wasn't adding up, and still doesn't add up. If he was going to take a shot at one player who was suspicious enough to be the recruiter, it was Saf.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:Pretty much agreeing with everything Anamaniacks said. If they weren't masons it would have been a big stretch for Saf to say it and I can't see any good reason why he did.
I may take another look into Aage. He hasn't really given me scum vibes that much but with as many people seeming to feel he's scummy it is possible I missed something.
DoomYoshi wrote:strike wolf wrote:Pretty much agreeing with everything Anamaniacks said. If they weren't masons it would have been a big stretch for Saf to say it and I can't see any good reason why he did.
I may take another look into Aage. He hasn't really given me scum vibes that much but with as many people seeming to feel he's scummy it is possible I missed something.
Safariguy isn't a "mason" though.
DoomYoshi wrote:Neither saf nor MoB voted jonty. The Chaotic Neutrals are probably the "mafia".
DoomYoshi wrote:Stubbz does have a double vote. Both were counted.
I smell fish.
vote stubbz
anamainiacks wrote:edocsil - Final VC wrote:Jonty (7) ~ Newguy, Epitaph, tfo, stubbs, Dazza, Neb, Stubbs
Mob (5)~ aage, newguy, DoomYoshi, jonty, Saf
No Lynch (3) ~ mob, rishaed, Gregwolfedocsil wrote:Those VC's are as accurate as I can get them. Sometimes I miss a vote, and then I go back and edit them when I am told.StubbsKVM wrote:Well, I have no double vote. I suppose that was a mistake on edoc's behalf.
All this doesn't add up... and what Stubbs is saying directly contradicts edoc. Sorry to bug you edoc, but can we can confirmation on the Day 1 VC again?
edocsil wrote:Anam, clearly it was a mistake. No, I am not going to recount it, because
A: It doesn't mater
B: It's a total waste of my time, that day is over
C: If there are vote shenanigans going on the result is almost always a ???
D: Every single VC has had a minor mistake in it. I have a very hard time doing them accurately, and I'm not sure why. I go through the posts line by line and then double check them once I'm done. I typically do the VCs at night once I get be from class and I tend to have a few beers. It likely doesn't help accuracy.
anamainiacks wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:If you were cult, who would you want on your team?
In other news, vote TFO since now I am dying to know what the action from last night is.
I'm confused - how does voting for TFO increase the chances of knowing what the action is? If you're referring to TFO's action, it wouldn't have been performed, since he was supposedly roleblocked, no?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users