imthewarrior wrote:Barfield & General Greivous (Multiple Accounts)
Accused:
Barfield
General Greivous
The accused are suspected of: Being Multis
Game number(s):
7243576 Had a truce and Took every turn in consecutive order.
10930674 Took every single turn in consecutive order
11302180 Took every single turn in consecutive order
11743268 General Greivous attacked Red and lost a ton of men to protect Barfield and is bordering Barfield who is the strongest player and neither of them are attacking each other.
Comments:
These games are clearly a case of Multi's without question!!!
I was going to look into SD but your comments confuse me. High lighted in red above I looked at the game in question. From game chat.
imthewarrior wrote:2012-10-05 14:49:26 - imthewarrior: Why would General Greivous attack me on Lancashire losing a dozen men to protect barfield.....Hmmmm
General Greivous did not attack you. He attacked Barfield and then you attacked General Greivous. From the game log in same game.
[quote="game 11743268]2012-10-05 12:41:12 - General Greivous assaulted Lancashire from Midlands and conquered it from barfield[/quote]
[quote="game 11743268] 2012-10-05 14:27:23 - imthewarrior assaulted Lancashire from Yorkshire and conquered it from General Greivous[/quote]
The other three game they took their turns in "consecutive order" because they were sequential games. It is hard to take a turn out of order.