Conquer Club

Pato69/Petromax Multi [Cleared] DCR

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Pato69/Petromax Multi [Cleared] DCR

Postby Hugiboo on Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:58 am

Accused:

Pato69
Petromax



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


Game number(s):

Game 11415229 (current)

Comments: a quick search of games in common & their profiles reveals the following:

- they have been accused before in game of multi/secret diplomacy
- they are both from Portugal & have played nearly the exact same number of games (difference of 1)
- they always join games together
- they never seem to attack each other until the end of the game
- it is clear from my current game that they have some arrangement as they guard borders heavily & are aggressive with everyone but each other.
Attachments
New Bitmap Image.jpg
User avatar
Major Hugiboo
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:36 pm

Re: Pato69/Petromax Multi [Pending] DCR

Postby Vandal88 on Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:25 pm

In game 11396914 they refused to attack one another even though one was about to win, instead the one kept attacking me even though I was offering a truce. I accused them of secret diplomacy/multi and they both gave me horrible ratings but refused to offer me an explanation, I thought about posting in the forum but didn't get around to it.
User avatar
Colonel Vandal88
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:50 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Pato69/Petromax Multi [Pending] DCR

Postby deathcomesrippin on Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:18 pm

Pato69 and Petromax are Cleared.
User avatar
Sergeant deathcomesrippin
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Canada

Re: Pato69/Petromax Multi [Cleared] DCR

Postby Hugiboo on Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:52 pm

If not multi, then secret diplomacy for sure. I started suspecting it might just be secret diplomacy as one has missed a turn while the other played & vice versa. Could be misdirection, but it makes secret diplomacy more likely in my opinion. Does a separate accusation need to be made for secret diplomacy or has it been considered & cleared as well?
User avatar
Major Hugiboo
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:36 pm


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users