Conquer Club

[Abandoned] Research & Conquer

Abandoned and Vacationed maps. The final resting place, unless you recycle.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Research & Conquer [Development Suspended]

Postby isaiah40 on Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:14 am

Here is V17!

Changes:
- tweaked the pipes a little
- Added in bends and 'T' 's to the pipes

Click image to enlarge.
image
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby natty dread on Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:51 am

You know, I think it might be better to start over with entirely new graphics... If Tacktix isn't working on this anymore.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby DiM on Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:25 am

natty dread wrote:You know, I think it might be better to start over with entirely new graphics... If Tacktix isn't working on this anymore.


i agree. you can keep the layout as it seems pretty well ironed out but i think starting over might actually be easier than fixing bits and pieces.
if you go for the fixing route in the end you might work more and achieve less.
ā€œIn the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.ā€- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby natty dread on Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:40 am

That, and also it's hard to take over the graphics someone else has made, if there's more than just minor changes to do - it easily ends up looking like a mish-mash of clashing styles...
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby isaiah40 on Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:32 am

So what do others say? Start from scratch or continue with this one?? I'm okay with it either way.
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby natty dread on Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:55 am

Here's a stylistic suggestion to you - it may seem like an odd image to take inspiration from, but whatever:

Image
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Research & Conquer [2 Aug 2011] (Version 12 in P1 & P72)

Postby DiM on Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:30 am

or.
show: old post
ā€œIn the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.ā€- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby ender516 on Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:09 pm

isaiah40 wrote:So what do others say? Start from scratch or continue with this one?? I'm okay with it either way.

Well, if you are okay with it either way (not that there's anything wrong with that ;) ) why not slap together a new look without making it your life's work? Throw it on here for a few quick yeas or nays, and if it doesn't catch fire, you still have all the old files to go forward with. I suspect almost anything new would be well received, just on the basis of novelty.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario

Re: Research & Conquer

Postby -=- Tanarri -=- on Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:22 am

TaCktiX wrote:I've done a lot of thinking about this map and my ability to do the necessary improvements over the past several days. I can't do it. My drive to do anything in Photoshop or on this site is essentially negative at this point. I go to work every day and get paid to do that, and I enjoy it. I do not get paid anything to be on this site and I'm not enjoying it at this point. So I am terminating my involvement with Research & Conquer at this point.

However, I still want to see the map reach play one day for the simple fact that Oliver had a great idea and it's one that deserves to see the light of day. I have given Industrial Helix the link to all of my source PSDs. Whoever is willing to take it forward can contact him for them.

As for me, I'm done. Once my final game on CC is concluded, I will not be logging back in. I wish I could say it was fun, but the past year has been anything but.


I'm sorry to see you leave, TaCKtiX, and I do hope that you will return at some point to enjoy all of the hard work that you've put into the map. Thank you for all the work you've put into the map over the last two years, it's very much appreciated.
User avatar
Captain -=- Tanarri -=-
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:02 pm
Location: The Underworld

Re: Research & Conquer

Postby ender516 on Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:05 pm

-=- Tanarri -=- wrote:
TaCktiX wrote:I've done a lot of thinking about this map and my ability to do the necessary improvements over the past several days. I can't do it. My drive to do anything in Photoshop or on this site is essentially negative at this point. I go to work every day and get paid to do that, and I enjoy it. I do not get paid anything to be on this site and I'm not enjoying it at this point. So I am terminating my involvement with Research & Conquer at this point.

However, I still want to see the map reach play one day for the simple fact that Oliver had a great idea and it's one that deserves to see the light of day. I have given Industrial Helix the link to all of my source PSDs. Whoever is willing to take it forward can contact him for them.

As for me, I'm done. Once my final game on CC is concluded, I will not be logging back in. I wish I could say it was fun, but the past year has been anything but.


I'm sorry to see you leave, TaCKtiX, and I do hope that you will return at some point to enjoy all of the hard work that you've put into the map. Thank you for all the work you've put into the map over the last two years, it's very much appreciated.

I just noticed that I failed to express my regrets over the departure of TaCktiX. Tanarri has said it very well.

I suspect that I let this slip initially as I was in a mood which came too close to agreeing with TaCktiX. I am not at the point of packing it all in here at CC, but it does seem more of a chore sometimes that it has in the past.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby -=- Tanarri -=- on Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:46 am

Just to comment on the start over vs. use TaCKtiX's design, I think that it depends on how much everyone feels would need to be done to the map to make the majority happy with it. If there's a fair bit left to do, then perhaps as someone mentioned it would be better to start from scratch rather than risk clashing of styles. I personally like TaCKtiX's version and think with a few tweak it would be good for a graphics stamp. That being said, I'm always interested to seeing other designs, suggestions, etc. as well.
User avatar
Captain -=- Tanarri -=-
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:02 pm
Location: The Underworld

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby RedBaron0 on Sat Feb 18, 2012 2:15 am

Bit more steampunk would be most ideal. But whatever you think, but yeah total revamp in your own hand isaiah .

I can't blame ya Tack, good luck, and thank you.
ImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class RedBaron0
 
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Research & Conquer [13 Feb 2012] V17 pg82

Postby thenobodies80 on Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:18 pm

Temporarily on [Vacation] as requested by Isaiah40. Give him some time to read throught the pages and see what needs to be done.

Isaiah let me know when you want this one moved back! ;)

Nobodies
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thenobodies80
 
Posts: 5400
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
Location: Milan

Re: [Vacation - valid untill Aug 2012] - Research & Conquer

Postby -=- Tanarri -=- on Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:27 pm

I look forward to seeing this get back on track whenever Isaiah finishes getting through the messages in the thread.

Since this is going on vacation and there's been 4-5 pages of stuff since I posted this last, the following are some notes for Oliver regarding the XML that should be fixed. I'm not sure if he got them the first time around and I want to make sure they don't get lost and cause problems later on down the road when this gets to beta :)

----------------

- The mines need to have all 40 included in the code, since it's possible to have 40 mines and not own 75% of the board

- Override tags should be included within the 'Mines with Mining' continents to override the 'Mines' continents so that it shows in BOB cleaner. Likewise, Deep Mining continents should include 'Mines with Mining' continents as requirements and override them as well, providing the full +4 per mine bonus instead of stacking two +2 bonuses. This would add a bit of bulk to the XML so I think it's an optional touch for the time being, but should be added after the XML update if nothing else.

- Zeppelin Strikes need to be renamed to Sabotage

- The borders on the tech territories should be removed except for the basic techs which need to attack their advanced techs. This needs to be fixed to prevent forting from occuring from the techs back to the laboratory. This is especially important for TSFs and Doomsday, as those autodeploys shouldn't be able to be used to directly research techs.
User avatar
Captain -=- Tanarri -=-
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:02 pm
Location: The Underworld

Re: [Vacation - valid untill Aug 2012] - Research & Conquer

Postby isaiah40 on Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:38 pm

Here's what I have come up with so far.
Ignore the mountains, they have a long way to go as they look like plastic pieces of poop.
1 - Enlarged the map.
2. Added dials/selector knobs and gauges
3. Removed the pipes
4. Added in the directional "SW" and such in each gauge and around each dial/selector knob
5. Added a forest to the playable area
6. Placed the playable area into a TV like screen thingy.
7. Redrew all the territories to make everything fit better and for clarity.

To do:
1. Add back in the instructions
2. Redo the mountains
3. Add in if there is room an inspection window (view of gears, tubes, wires etc.)

Click image to enlarge.
image
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: [Vacation - valid untill Aug 2012] - Research & Conquer

Postby RedBaron0 on Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:42 pm

:punt: Back you go. [Moved]
ImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class RedBaron0
 
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby -=- Tanarri -=- on Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:22 am

Hi Isaiah,

I don't have much time to properly respond, but thought I'd give a few first impressions.

As far as the map area goes, I think it's improved a fair bit. While I liked the theme that TaCKtiX had going and thought it fit a bit better with the steampunk concept, his map area graphics were limited because of it. So great work with that part :)

For my own preferences, the grey and bronze texture could use some work. I think they appear rather pixelated and while I like the general concept, I think it could use a different texture. The bright purple / pink colour for conscriptions seems really out of place and I think it should be a different colour.

The last major thing I think that needs to be rethought about this design is the size of the map. Even at a pretty decent screen resolution on a wide screen monitor the map runs nearly all the way to the right, making it so that you would need to scroll right just to see the list of players, clock, etc. on the right side of the map. I think the current design of the map doesn't use space very efficiently. It almost looks like you chose the maximum supersize resolution to start and then tried to think of how to fill in the space. I think the previous layout which was used for the labratories which had everything arranged in rows would work better than the dials. The current sections that are arranged like that already could be shrunk down and I think that would clear up some space. It may also be possible to stick one or two of the researches underneath the map, depending on how much space the instructions need. That would help reduce some of the vertical space.

I think that covers it for now. All in all I think it's a really good start to a redesign, it just needs some tweaking and size reduction.

Good job :)
User avatar
Captain -=- Tanarri -=-
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:02 pm
Location: The Underworld

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby isaiah40 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:35 am

-=- Tanarri -=- wrote:Hi Isaiah,

I don't have much time to properly respond, but thought I'd give a few first impressions.

As far as the map area goes, I think it's improved a fair bit. While I liked the theme that TaCKtiX had going and thought it fit a bit better with the steampunk concept, his map area graphics were limited because of it. So great work with that part :)

Thank you!

For my own preferences, the grey and bronze texture could use some work. I think they appear rather pixelated and while I like the general concept, I think it could use a different texture. The bright purple / pink colour for conscriptions seems really out of place and I think it should be a different colour.

You are talking about the background correct? Yea I just threw the color there so people can still see the connection so it will be changed.

The last major thing I think that needs to be rethought about this design is the size of the map. Even at a pretty decent screen resolution on a wide screen monitor the map runs nearly all the way to the right, making it so that you would need to scroll right just to see the list of players, clock, etc. on the right side of the map. I think the current design of the map doesn't use space very efficiently. It almost looks like you chose the maximum supersize resolution to start and then tried to think of how to fill in the space. I think the previous layout which was used for the labratories which had everything arranged in rows would work better than the dials. The current sections that are arranged like that already could be shrunk down and I think that would clear up some space. It may also be possible to stick one or two of the researches underneath the map, depending on how much space the instructions need. That would help reduce some of the vertical space.

Actually I tried doing it at the original size and kept upsizing from there. My main concern/goal was to make the TV area clear and uncluttered which I believe I accomplished. The dials are at the smallest size possible to fit in the 888's - yes I shrunk them down to make sure. As for everything else, I think we can agree that the gauges can stay. I'm partial to the dials, but they can be changed. i could have the Laboratories as a dial instead and go back to the gauges for everything. Once I get the instructions finished then we can go from there on rearranging everything and get this smaller.

[quoteI think that covers it for now. All in all I think it's a really good start to a redesign, it just needs some tweaking and size reduction.

Good job :)[/quote]
And thank you again!
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby Gillipig on Sat Mar 31, 2012 11:38 am

Oh boy, a big change for sure!! I like the green playing field. Gives it some familiarity. The previous playing field was a little too "alien" :). In total I think it's an improvement although I see quite a lot of things that needs to be changed.
I agree with Tanarri that the map is bigger than necessary, lots of spare room. The map image isn't centered. I think you should dress the legend around the map just like in the previous version. The pink/purple legend text is hard to look at and doesn't fit in very well.

Maybe you could give the title some moss to give it an overgrown and forgotten feel!? When I think of it you could frame the entire map with moss like vegetation. It would go well with the green playing field.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
User avatar
Lieutenant Gillipig
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby natty dread on Sat Mar 31, 2012 11:51 am

Ok, first of all, there's way too much wasted space, the playable area is way too small compared to the surroundings.

The image composition is not balanced. The colours clash, the bright green playable area looks out of place in middle of all those grey/brown hues, and in general all the elements of the map just don't seem to match each other.

Lastly, the textures are really blurry, and the text looks pasted on, like it doesn't belong to the image...
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby Gillipig on Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:02 pm

natty dread wrote:Ok, first of all, there's way too much wasted space, the playable area is way too small compared to the surroundings.

The image composition is not balanced. The colours clash, the bright green playable area looks out of place in middle of all those grey/brown hues, and in general all the elements of the map just don't seem to match each other.

Lastly, the textures are really blurry, and the text looks pasted on, like it doesn't belong to the image...

Having a bad day natty :)?
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
User avatar
Lieutenant Gillipig
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby natty dread on Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:16 pm

Gillipig wrote:
natty dread wrote:Ok, first of all, there's way too much wasted space, the playable area is way too small compared to the surroundings.

The image composition is not balanced. The colours clash, the bright green playable area looks out of place in middle of all those grey/brown hues, and in general all the elements of the map just don't seem to match each other.

Lastly, the textures are really blurry, and the text looks pasted on, like it doesn't belong to the image...

Having a bad day natty :)?


I wasn't until I saw you. How about you post something useful for once?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby isaiah40 on Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:58 am

Sorry folks, but I just don't have the mojo to continue this for the time being. I request that this is placed on vacation.
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby RedBaron0 on Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:06 am

By mapmakers request, this map is placed on vacation. [Moved]

Please contact any available CA to have this moved back to the Main Foundry, once an update has been made. Gameplay may be reevaluated at that time to conform to current Foundry standards and the GP stamp stripped if the map is found to be deficient in any way.
ImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class RedBaron0
 
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Research & Conquer Version 18 [20 March 2012] pg 83

Postby Gillipig on Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:49 am

isaiah40 wrote:Sorry folks, but I just don't have the mojo to continue this for the time being. I request that this is placed on vacation.

A shame :(, just when things were starting to happen.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
User avatar
Lieutenant Gillipig
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Recycling Box

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users