Moderator: Community Team
gimli1990 wrote:you know Got Tonka'd even though i had nothing to add just a couple of days ago i do now.
just to be sure firstUnvote
Vote Got tonka
reason's being.
A. you have accused 3 different of random stuff in the last 3 pages.
B. and now you are going after fircaol with some stuff.
c. you then say you are willing to hear more from other replacements but leave your vote on me at that point
d. you come out attacking me for trying to stay active. grant it i posted nothing useful but i still did.
and i FOS at iilad he basically votes me and then says it is because i added nothing. did he add anything??
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Bleed_Green wrote:I am just going to Unvote at this time to hear what CK has to say... still really suspicious of Shield though.... I am thinking he might be hiding underneath the N00b title to pull one over on us
Bleed_Green wrote:Rodion wrote:freezie wrote:Now for Rodion vs Bleed:
I find Rodion's way of thought to my liking, but one part of his post is bugging me:Rodion wrote:I had, however, the feeling that there wouldn't be a third Romeo and Juliet character, unless he had an alignment other than town.
Where did you dig up such info? We don't know if Juliet is scum or not, she isn't dead ( yet ). How would a scum character from Romeo and juliet be so improbable? It's a little early to make such speculations.
You misunderstood me. I'm not saying a scum character from Romeo and Juliet is improbable. I actually said just the opposite. I said that I could only see a 3rd Romeo and Juliet character if that 3rd character was not pro-town.
I guessed (pure speculation) that we had either:
a) Romeo town, Juliet town, 3rd character anti-town
b) Romeo town, Juliet mafia, 3rd character not-town
c) Romeo town, Juliet whatever, no more characters from this book/play
I considered the possibility of Bleed being a pro-town Romeo and Juliet character close to inexistent (but still possible, that's why I made him the question instead of instantly presenting a case on him), so I decided to question him and likely get an answer that I considered scummy, which is exactly what happened.
I am not sure how me telling you that my character was not a part of Romeo & Juliet made me scummy, I did not hide from your question. The only real fact that you have against me is that I was unable to determine the scope of the game like you were. This is easily done for your vast experience to the game and me just learning.
Bleed_Green wrote:Rodion wrote:I asked this because depending on how this will be conducted it is possible that I waste my power AND get no credibility (people could think I fakeclaimed but got lucky), so it's possible that a 100% chance of a lynch is actually more desirable than a 50/50.
I still don't like this idea at all and you have been trying to crucify me from the beginning.
VOTE Rodion
Bleed_Green wrote:freezie wrote:Bleed_Green wrote:Rodion wrote:I asked this because depending on how this will be conducted it is possible that I waste my power AND get no credibility (people could think I fakeclaimed but got lucky), so it's possible that a 100% chance of a lynch is actually more desirable than a 50/50.
I still don't like this idea at all and you have been trying to crucify me from the beginning.
VOTE Rodion
I'd like to note this as a pathetic way to find an excuse to vote him again.
Note all you want but I would like to you to find where I even voted him the first time? It never happened because like I said I below which came from page 59.. But I do what Rodion has requested, I do believe that he is town and this will clear him.Bleed_Green wrote:the case on Rodion, I still do not by it especially for a lynch to see if his powers are true. The reason for this is he pointed out 2 key things that will result in his death, 1st if we lynch him he will blow the horn and ultimately save his lynch (but as the literature goes it was to late and he dies anyways) so there is a 50/50 chance that he will live. If he lives then he still holds the role as a mason, this has now given the mafia role that they may want to use there NK on.
Bleed_Green wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:TSL, you haven't really been very active here. Your only two points of activity are when you claimed with no provocation and then started rolefishing. Do I smell a possible Jester?
no. I have already claimed if you look.
I am Pikachu, Vanilla Townie.
I am reading but still can't get my head around the setup of this game...
I am having a huge issue with the way you are playing this game. And I believe that you are using Pikachu and the Pokemon to deter away from the actual game.
When going back and reading all of your posts, everything prior to page 22 was normal posting without any reference to pokemon or pikachu, but on pg 22 which was already D2 you brought him to light.So it looks like three things. Three Night Kills.
Night Kill 1- Directed at Godfrey but some sort of bodyguard perhaps?
Night Kill 2- Directed at the Bodyguard, he died.
Night Kill 3- directed at the shadow, but the shadow was un nkable. (So we have to lynch him.)
This is not your usual mafia. pika is it chu?
They out of know where you claimed to break up the Shakesperian theme game but it was already decide quite a long time back that the them was vast with a whole bunch of elements and characters brought into the mix, as well at that time there were no discussions about Shakespeare (you were either skimming substantially or diverting_Pg 41I would just like to put a spanner in the shakespearian works here.
I am Pikachu... This could almost be a fircoal game.
Then on Pg 46 just out of no where you postedPika Pika
no indication why but seems very weird.
On page 63 you now are trying to see if any other pokemon are out thereThis is a blantant attempt to either fish for other characters or divert from the gameI also have to ask are there any more pokemon out there?pg 64No. But I can see how knights templars, vampires and werewolfs, and pokemon fit in the same mafia game.TheSaxlad wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:TSL, you haven't really been very active here. Your only two points of activity are when you claimed with no provocation and then started rolefishing. Do I smell a possible Jester?
no. I have already claimed if you look.
I am Pikachu, Vanilla Townie.
I am reading but still can't get my head around the setup of this game...
You have been given no pressure but you still seem to give out a lot of information for no apparent reason. Why are you giving out this information?
TheSaxlad for diverting and skimming
Bleed_Green wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:No Jester. And actually I invite you to lynch me as it may prove to you that this can happen.
I almost feel like colton and the fptslboia incident.
What is that you are actually trying to prove right now? As well Rodion just tried the same attempt on D2 giving himself up for a lynch and he turned out to be scum.wow bleed that seems like a really week case when i read it i thought what your voting for what again? a bad joke?
Target, I voted for him for skimming and I feel a blatant attempt to divert the town from actually trying to uncover anything. If you look at his post there is nothing of substance.It obviously would not make a whole lot of sense to lynch saxlad. He would pretty much have to be a jester from his behavior. Jesters are not really a very big concern considering all of the things we should be looking out for.
I would be more inclined to see if we cannot figure out who might be the last vampire if there is one or who the new leader of the werewolves is. And obviously we are still missing a shadow, so perhaps players who have been lying low are a better use of our efforts than sax.
He is stating that he is not a Jester. I am not against pressuring the inactives right now. The is one that stands out in my mind and that is Shaggy. His last 3 post were just to state that he has nothing to add, as well that he had finals which schools in more important but he stated that they were finished on the 15th and once completed he would be more active and I have yet to see that. I have also provided a list of people still in so we do not always have to jump to the first page:
1. safariguy5
2. freezie
3. talapus
4. ndrs
5. Edocsil
6. vioiet
7. targetman377
8. TheSaxlad
9. Iliad
10. DoomYoshi
11. gimli1990
12. blakebowling
13. jeraado
14. Got tonkaed
15. ShaggyDan
16. nagerous
17. Strike Wolf
18. Fircoal
Bleed_Green wrote:No I definitely am going to give him some more time since it is only the 17th, but just stating that for submarining he is one of the guys that is on the top of my list. Just trying to see who else is on the towns radar for this...
Bleed_Green wrote:based on how well Rodin faked claimed i could total see this as an option and could be vampire,scum or anything anti town.
If I was scum in any way why would Rodion be pursuing me so hard to have me lynched if I was apart of his fraction?
Bleed_Green wrote:based on how well Rodin faked claimed i could total see this as an option and could be vampire,scum or anything anti town.
If I was scum in any way why would Rodion be pursuing me so hard to have me lynched if I was apart of his fraction?
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:Most of this was made day 2 and I just never got around to posting it so at this point some of this might be a bit out dated but I did try to go back through and edit where it needed to be.
Bleed:Bleed_Green wrote:I am just going to Unvote at this time to hear what CK has to say... still really suspicious of Shield though.... I am thinking he might be hiding underneath the N00b title to pull one over on us
Only non-joke vote post of day 1. Though he has given what appears to be a legitimate reason for absense.
The Rodion argument was also interesting (yes I know he was scum but some things about his argument still hold true) it is not 100% fool proof but it does seem to show that Bleed did lie about what he knew of the game.Bleed_Green wrote:Rodion wrote:freezie wrote:Now for Rodion vs Bleed:
I find Rodion's way of thought to my liking, but one part of his post is bugging me:Rodion wrote:I had, however, the feeling that there wouldn't be a third Romeo and Juliet character, unless he had an alignment other than town.
Where did you dig up such info? We don't know if Juliet is scum or not, she isn't dead ( yet ). How would a scum character from Romeo and juliet be so improbable? It's a little early to make such speculations.
You misunderstood me. I'm not saying a scum character from Romeo and Juliet is improbable. I actually said just the opposite. I said that I could only see a 3rd Romeo and Juliet character if that 3rd character was not pro-town.
I guessed (pure speculation) that we had either:
a) Romeo town, Juliet town, 3rd character anti-town
b) Romeo town, Juliet mafia, 3rd character not-town
c) Romeo town, Juliet whatever, no more characters from this book/play
I considered the possibility of Bleed being a pro-town Romeo and Juliet character close to inexistent (but still possible, that's why I made him the question instead of instantly presenting a case on him), so I decided to question him and likely get an answer that I considered scummy, which is exactly what happened.
I am not sure how me telling you that my character was not a part of Romeo & Juliet made me scummy, I did not hide from your question. The only real fact that you have against me is that I was unable to determine the scope of the game like you were. This is easily done for your vast experience to the game and me just learning.
Playing the newbie card?Bleed_Green wrote:Rodion wrote:I asked this because depending on how this will be conducted it is possible that I waste my power AND get no credibility (people could think I fakeclaimed but got lucky), so it's possible that a 100% chance of a lynch is actually more desirable than a 50/50.
I still don't like this idea at all and you have been trying to crucify me from the beginning.
VOTE Rodion
Jumping on towards very end of wagon. Your opinion of rodion seems to jump around a lot from it being him just scum hunting and the case against you being a misunderstanding and him attempting to crucify you. The two ideas seeming a bit exclusive.Bleed_Green wrote:freezie wrote:Bleed_Green wrote:Rodion wrote:I asked this because depending on how this will be conducted it is possible that I waste my power AND get no credibility (people could think I fakeclaimed but got lucky), so it's possible that a 100% chance of a lynch is actually more desirable than a 50/50.
I still don't like this idea at all and you have been trying to crucify me from the beginning.
VOTE Rodion
I'd like to note this as a pathetic way to find an excuse to vote him again.
Note all you want but I would like to you to find where I even voted him the first time? It never happened because like I said I below which came from page 59.. But I do what Rodion has requested, I do believe that he is town and this will clear him.Bleed_Green wrote:the case on Rodion, I still do not by it especially for a lynch to see if his powers are true. The reason for this is he pointed out 2 key things that will result in his death, 1st if we lynch him he will blow the horn and ultimately save his lynch (but as the literature goes it was to late and he dies anyways) so there is a 50/50 chance that he will live. If he lives then he still holds the role as a mason, this has now given the mafia role that they may want to use there NK on.
So now you think he is town again and you're just testing the claim? That doesn't appear to be the reason you voted him...Bleed_Green wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:TSL, you haven't really been very active here. Your only two points of activity are when you claimed with no provocation and then started rolefishing. Do I smell a possible Jester?
no. I have already claimed if you look.
I am Pikachu, Vanilla Townie.
I am reading but still can't get my head around the setup of this game...
I am having a huge issue with the way you are playing this game. And I believe that you are using Pikachu and the Pokemon to deter away from the actual game.
When going back and reading all of your posts, everything prior to page 22 was normal posting without any reference to pokemon or pikachu, but on pg 22 which was already D2 you brought him to light.So it looks like three things. Three Night Kills.
Night Kill 1- Directed at Godfrey but some sort of bodyguard perhaps?
Night Kill 2- Directed at the Bodyguard, he died.
Night Kill 3- directed at the shadow, but the shadow was un nkable. (So we have to lynch him.)
This is not your usual mafia. pika is it chu?
They out of know where you claimed to break up the Shakesperian theme game but it was already decide quite a long time back that the them was vast with a whole bunch of elements and characters brought into the mix, as well at that time there were no discussions about Shakespeare (you were either skimming substantially or diverting_Pg 41I would just like to put a spanner in the shakespearian works here.
I am Pikachu... This could almost be a fircoal game.
Then on Pg 46 just out of no where you postedPika Pika
no indication why but seems very weird.
On page 63 you now are trying to see if any other pokemon are out thereThis is a blantant attempt to either fish for other characters or divert from the gameI also have to ask are there any more pokemon out there?pg 64No. But I can see how knights templars, vampires and werewolfs, and pokemon fit in the same mafia game.TheSaxlad wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:TSL, you haven't really been very active here. Your only two points of activity are when you claimed with no provocation and then started rolefishing. Do I smell a possible Jester?
no. I have already claimed if you look.
I am Pikachu, Vanilla Townie.
I am reading but still can't get my head around the setup of this game...
You have been given no pressure but you still seem to give out a lot of information for no apparent reason. Why are you giving out this information?
TheSaxlad for diverting and skimming
I don't actually have anything against the logic itself but I do find the timing of it a bit suspect (there wasn't really a bandwagon against him but posting pattern was clearly shifting against him) and the aforementioned reasoning about trying to get a quick day against the people on this case.Bleed_Green wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:No Jester. And actually I invite you to lynch me as it may prove to you that this can happen.
I almost feel like colton and the fptslboia incident.
What is that you are actually trying to prove right now? As well Rodion just tried the same attempt on D2 giving himself up for a lynch and he turned out to be scum.wow bleed that seems like a really week case when i read it i thought what your voting for what again? a bad joke?
Target, I voted for him for skimming and I feel a blatant attempt to divert the town from actually trying to uncover anything. If you look at his post there is nothing of substance.It obviously would not make a whole lot of sense to lynch saxlad. He would pretty much have to be a jester from his behavior. Jesters are not really a very big concern considering all of the things we should be looking out for.
I would be more inclined to see if we cannot figure out who might be the last vampire if there is one or who the new leader of the werewolves is. And obviously we are still missing a shadow, so perhaps players who have been lying low are a better use of our efforts than sax.
He is stating that he is not a Jester. I am not against pressuring the inactives right now. The is one that stands out in my mind and that is Shaggy. His last 3 post were just to state that he has nothing to add, as well that he had finals which schools in more important but he stated that they were finished on the 15th and once completed he would be more active and I have yet to see that. I have also provided a list of people still in so we do not always have to jump to the first page:
1. safariguy5
2. freezie
3. talapus
4. ndrs
5. Edocsil
6. vioiet
7. targetman377
8. TheSaxlad
9. Iliad
10. DoomYoshi
11. gimli1990
12. blakebowling
13. jeraado
14. Got tonkaed
15. ShaggyDan
16. nagerous
17. Strike Wolf
18. Fircoal
Honestly, I feel like I've already said this but no one is going to out right say they are a jester, unless maybe they are a reverse jester and looking for town to NK them but that's wifom. So it's sax or an inactive and nothing in between. there were still some cases for day 3 I don't see why defaulting to an inactive would be your stance unless you don't want to try making too many actual stances in the game and watch it come back to bite you in the arse.Bleed_Green wrote:No I definitely am going to give him some more time since it is only the 17th, but just stating that for submarining he is one of the guys that is on the top of my list. Just trying to see who else is on the towns radar for this...
Now that the sax wagon is losing steam are you already looking for the next popular bandwagon to jump on? It would save you the trouble of committing to your own ideas and keep you below the radar...Bleed_Green wrote:based on how well Rodin faked claimed i could total see this as an option and could be vampire,scum or anything anti town.
If I was scum in any way why would Rodion be pursuing me so hard to have me lynched if I was apart of his fraction?Bleed_Green wrote:based on how well Rodin faked claimed i could total see this as an option and could be vampire,scum or anything anti town.
If I was scum in any way why would Rodion be pursuing me so hard to have me lynched if I was apart of his fraction?
Flawed logic is flawed. Wifom logic is WIFOM. We've been over the multiple scum factions argument before so the fact you may not be aligned with rodion directly does not disprove you are scum. i think I've already stated a wifomy rebuttal to that wifom statement about why he might have gone after you if you had been in the same faction.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
gimli1990 wrote:i know i am a rookie i am trying to figure out this set up. excuse me for getting confused and saying so.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:Well it's definitely not the only solution but this game is stagnating right now and we need some kind of bandwagon that can be agreed upon just to get discussion flowing. Sax seems to be the best chance of that right now.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:Yeah. vote sax
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users