Latore wrote:wow if I read the game chat properly Red you had an alliance with Torres and then decided with no warning to break the alliance.
Then get all pissy when he goes after you in retaliation which anyone would do. Then you go and try to accuse him of cheating in CC Forms now.
When in fact you broke an alliance with no warning but see no issues in that.
Can't believe someone would go to your extent when you actually started it all..
Next time when you want to break an alliance need to give warning and do it the honest honorable way.
If not expect what just happened each and everytime from any player. Retaliation for breaking alliance
\
Alright, im not being pissy and do not appreciate the name calling. I am simply stating a few things:
a) no alliance was actaully made no terms of an alliance were given- you could argue the alliance was over once blue was under control, you could argue there was no alliance but if you choose to say that there was an alliance and the basis of teh alliance was to control blue then the alliance suceeded its purpose and is now over so therefore i attacked.
b) in any type of game doubles, 1 v1, or yes even,4 player games- the purpose of each game should be to win them, perhaps its not suiciding and im sure i mention that in the original post and im sure i mentioned that im not even sure it is cheating. I am trying to get to the principal of having rules, so that the game can be fair, and to not have players to intentionally lose just cause they have a problem with an attack.
Now to those who childishly went to name calling and accusations:
a) I myself wouldnt call this cheating- but a form of abuse of what i feel is in the unwritten rules.
b) I wouldn't say i enjoy drama since this is probably my first post in this forum in a very long time probably over a year, maybe even two, where as you all read and respond to this forum like it is some type of duty of yours. You all are the drama lovers- i just wanted to voice a concern of mine.
c) I was agreeing to that blue was getting big- there are two parts to that sentence, it is not clear to which i said i agreed to.
I seriously am not looking for any trouble or and hostility, as i said, i wanted to bring this to attention- that games should be played to be won, essentially it is suiciding maybe not all your troops but eventually suiciding tha game. I went through little trouble to post this and essentially it is just one game no more than 20-30 pts? I'm easily able to regain them.