nagerous wrote:IcePack wrote:nagerous wrote:A lot of you are clearly not aware of British nomenclature, I would classify the phrase 'get bent' as an example of a bigoted statement offensive to homosexuals akin to other statements like calling someone 'queer' or a 'cockmuncher.'
Is jefjef British? "fag" is bigotry in the US but is a cigarette in britian. So if someone from britian said it wouldnt you argue context and intent? Of course.
He's not british, that wasn't the intent, it's not the meaning in the US.
IcePack
That's not the intent? His intent is clearly to flame eddie from what I can see on the message and he did so with what seems to me a homophobic slur, that is very different to say 'just going off for a fag' as in cigarette, if I was to write on someones wall 'you fag' I don't think I could justify saying I was calling him a cigarette.
I never said it was the same thing. I used it as an example of multiple meanings in different areas for the same word(s). C'mon man. JefJef is from US, tell me how you know the intent of the poster was bigotry???? It may have been rude, or blunt but I highly doubt it was more than that. Just cuz it means something worse somewhere else on the planet doesn't validate a statement that jefjef is a bigot.
Its not a normal slur used in sexual context everywhere, I know it's not used that way in Cali around me / the group I'm around.
It's same level as "get lost" or "f*ck off". If someone can prove jefjef meant it as a slur then clearly it'd be wrong. But I don't / haven't seen it.
IcePack