A one game forfeit would have been equally ridiculous. The rule should be the game in question should either be if the infringing team wins, the games are (1) remade or (2) have the win vacated. In this situation, the score would have remained TOFU 32 - KoRT 28 because the 21st game was Cman which KoRT won.Culs De Sac wrote:looks like that multiple game forfeit instead of 1 game penalty came in handy =P
But, to illustrate the point, had the score been TOFU 31 - KoRT 29 with the final game Cman being a TOFU win, the option should be either to replay Cman with appropriate teams or vacate the win so that the final score would have been TOFU 30 - KoRT 29. It is absolutely ridiculous to confer an automatic win for that type of mistake - you should have the option to retain the game should the non-infringing team win that game, but if the infringing team were to win that in no way warrants the other team automatically getting a point which would have made it 30-30 overcompensating the non-infringer for a win non-deserved. And in the end, the non-infringer will have at least 2 opportunities to win the map and that is more than adequate to compensate for someone joining 1 additional game by mistake.







