Super Nova wrote:Thought I'd just mention that Anna is also the same sorceress that supposedly created the spell to bind the princess in the first place:
Anna Choldrin
I missed that. You had a busy chapter, plot-wise.
thunderhue
Moderator: Tournament Directors
Super Nova wrote:Thought I'd just mention that Anna is also the same sorceress that supposedly created the spell to bind the princess in the first place:
Anna Choldrin
thunderhue wrote:Super Nova wrote:Thought I'd just mention that Anna is also the same sorceress that supposedly created the spell to bind the princess in the first place:
Anna Choldrin
I missed that. You had a busy chapter, plot-wise.
thunderhue
laughingcavalier wrote:There's been some talk in our game about how long the current round & some later rounds might go on. Would a round limit fit the spirit of the tourney?
Lindax wrote:laughingcavalier wrote:There's been some talk in our game about how long the current round & some later rounds might go on. Would a round limit fit the spirit of the tourney?
We have a proposal: How about a round limit of 50 rounds for all games?
If there is no winner after round 50, no player gets a shield.
What does everybody think of this?
Lx & Zz
Tammy DeLee wrote:Lindax wrote:laughingcavalier wrote:There's been some talk in our game about how long the current round & some later rounds might go on. Would a round limit fit the spirit of the tourney?
We have a proposal: How about a round limit of 50 rounds for all games?
If there is no winner after round 50, no player gets a shield.
What does everybody think of this?
Lx & Zz
or everyone gets a shield!
What can I say? Me likes presents!
MyTurnToWin wrote:Round limit is fine.
BUT even though the idea of everyone getting a shield sounds good, it does leave it open for players to purposely let the game go 50 rounds in order to get a shield... which is unfair to those whose game ended before 50 rounds.
TheSaxlad wrote:fine. i like the idea of everyone who HASNT been elimd getting a shield.
MyTurnToWin wrote:Round limit is fine.
BUT even though the idea of everyone getting a shield sounds good, it does leave it open for players to purposely let the game go 50 rounds in order to get a shield... which is unfair to those whose game ended before 50 rounds.
Tammy DeLee wrote:I told you not to expect ernest hemingway! My writing is more like the works of Dr. Seuss!
But here is my story and I havent a clue how many words are in it, but it looks about the same length as the others, so let me know if i need to edit my masterpiece!
Lindax wrote:laughingcavalier wrote:There's been some talk in our game about how long the current round & some later rounds might go on. Would a round limit fit the spirit of the tourney?
We have a proposal: How about a round limit of 50 rounds for all games?
If there is no winner after round 50, no player gets a shield.
What does everybody think of this?
Lx & Zz
Lindax wrote:We have a proposal: How about a round limit of 50 rounds for all games?
If there is no winner after round 50, no player gets a shield.
What does everybody think of this?
Lx & Zz
Users browsing this forum: No registered users