Moderator: Cartographers
Can you explain what you mean with this?ender516 wrote:..., crossing each other at an angle.
Just something like this:nilcius wrote:Can you explain what you mean with this?ender516 wrote:..., crossing each other at an angle.
Update: I will be away the next 10 days, so i'll finish this when I'm back

This I agree with.I think Sudan should be worth at most 4. 5 troops for 6 territories is excessive.

I was about to suggest the very same thingghirrindin wrote:I would support changing the name of this map from "Oasis Sahara" to "The Sahara" or simply "Sahara." My reason is the current name may confuse some players into thinking your map is the sequel to the popular Oasis map already in play. It's obviously your call, but I'd like to see this map have its own identity.

Yeah - defo make the posts a +1 neutral to start. In fact, you could do interesting things with the ports such as decay, maybe even killer neutral.Evil DIMwit wrote:It doesn't seem to me that ports have much particular significance except for the fact that they connect to other ports, and those other ports also start neutral, so I'd say 3 might be too high.nilcius wrote:Ports start with 3 also, you agree with that?