Moderator: Cartographers
ender516 wrote:..., crossing each other at an angle.
nilcius wrote:ender516 wrote:..., crossing each other at an angle.
Can you explain what you mean with this?
Update: I will be away the next 10 days, so i'll finish this when I'm back
I think Sudan should be worth at most 4. 5 troops for 6 territories is excessive.
ghirrindin wrote:I would support changing the name of this map from "Oasis Sahara" to "The Sahara" or simply "Sahara." My reason is the current name may confuse some players into thinking your map is the sequel to the popular Oasis map already in play. It's obviously your call, but I'd like to see this map have its own identity.
Evil DIMwit wrote:nilcius wrote:Ports start with 3 also, you agree with that?
It doesn't seem to me that ports have much particular significance except for the fact that they connect to other ports, and those other ports also start neutral, so I'd say 3 might be too high.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users