Moderator: Community Team
Yep. K, I'm dead now bye.spiesr wrote:I think he was more referring to his opinion that he was the only one who showed any backbone on day 1, and now that he is dead we will take ages to reach a lynch...captainwalrus wrote:Are you insulting the setup?F1fth wrote:This game... oh man, it makes me laugh.Good luck boys. It's gonna be a long and noncommital game.
This is going to snowball fast.
Fifth never posted anything of real value, so I Am not sure how he was showing backbone.spiesr wrote:I think he was more referring to his opinion that he was the only one who showed any backbone on day 1, and now that he is dead we will take ages to reach a lynch...captainwalrus wrote:Are you insulting the setup?F1fth wrote:This game... oh man, it makes me laugh.
This is going to snowball fast.
im getting voted for my LOG-IN TIMES!!!?!!!! WHAT!!! is this because i was TOWN(not really, but neutral) in the other game, and i got lynched anyway?Rainbow Eater wrote:Fifth never posted anything of real value, so I Am not sure how he was showing backbone.spiesr wrote:I think he was more referring to his opinion that he was the only one who showed any backbone on day 1, and now that he is dead we will take ages to reach a lynch...captainwalrus wrote:Are you insulting the setup?F1fth wrote:This game... oh man, it makes me laugh.
This is going to snowball fast.
He had a welcome post on page 9.
His posted on page 10 FOS on the entire colton wagon (which is where we might want to start)
Page 10 posts #2 and #3 were just talking about the setup.
His post on page 12 he votes wercool who turned out to be a peasant.
After that it was night or he was dead. So I don't get it.
Anyways, Vote Vodean
very quick hammer and part of the colton bandwagon without any good reasons.
No, you are being voted for dropping the final vote without really giving a good reason in Rainbow Eater's eyes.vodean wrote:im getting voted for my LOG-IN TIMES!!!?!!!! WHAT!!! is this because i was TOWN(not really, but neutral) in the other game, and i got lynched anyway?
hm.... but everyone else is ok. i see. i had FOSed wer LONG before that. i actually was the one to bring it up...spiesr wrote:No, you are being voted for dropping the final vote without really giving a good reason in Rainbow Eater's eyes.vodean wrote:im getting voted for my LOG-IN TIMES!!!?!!!! WHAT!!! is this because i was TOWN(not really, but neutral) in the other game, and i got lynched anyway?
The key in spiesr sentence is FINAL VOTE. you gave him no chance to claim, you just hammered. at L-1 you should have given him a chance to claim and prove his innocence. Does not matter what you wanted to do, it matters what you do.vodean wrote:hm.... but everyone else is ok. i see. i had FOSed wer LONG before that. i actually was the one to bring it up...spiesr wrote:No, you are being voted for dropping the final vote without really giving a good reason in Rainbow Eater's eyes.vodean wrote:im getting voted for my LOG-IN TIMES!!!?!!!! WHAT!!! is this because i was TOWN(not really, but neutral) in the other game, and i got lynched anyway?
looking good for the mafia. we need to vote people we can get a case against, not people who suggest something, and then vote for it last... Thats like me telling the next president to run today, and i am the last to go to the poll. my vote does not count any more than everyone elses.
When voting for a president, you can cast your vote until a certain time. Whe did not have a fixed deadline. You effectivly created a deadline for him without giving him a chance to act within that deadline.vodean wrote: looking good for the mafia. we need to vote people we can get a case against, not people who suggest something, and then vote for it last... Thats like me telling the next president to run today, and i am the last to go to the poll. my vote does not count any more than everyone elses.
^at 9:41 amRainbow Eater wrote:unvote vote wercool
inactivity stinks
^at 9:52 amUTAlan wrote:Agreed. unvote vote wercoolRainbow Eater wrote:inactivity stinks
^at 10:54 amvodean wrote:unvote vote werUTAlan wrote:Agreed. unvote vote wercoolRainbow Eater wrote:inactivity stinks
from the posts it looks like he was agreeing with you that inactivity stinks, which seems to be the reason that you voted for wercool, now vodean should have checked how many votes wercool had to see if his would be the number seven but i doubt that anyone would take the time to go back and check the votes themselvesRainbow Eater wrote:
Anyways, Vote Vodean
very quick hammer and part of the colton bandwagon without any good reasons.
at the same time, you need to know should know that it is close. It is not that hard to go to the previous vote count and go from there....... especially when there are only 7 posts between when the last vote count was completed and vodean voted.gregwolf121 wrote: .....but i doubt that anyone would take the time to go back and check the votes themselves
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Yes, it was a short run there, making it usual for scum and the revolution to put value in his death, duality did quite literally nothing, so there nothing there besides the possibility of a inactive hating delayed day-killer.Rainbow Eater wrote:Fifth never posted anything of real value, so I Am not sure how he was showing backbone.spiesr wrote:I think he was more referring to his opinion that he was the only one who showed any backbone on day 1, and now that he is dead we will take ages to reach a lynch...captainwalrus wrote:Are you insulting the setup?F1fth wrote:This game... oh man, it makes me laugh.
This is going to snowball fast.
He had a welcome post on page 9.
His posted on page 10 FOS on the entire colton wagon (which is where we might want to start)
Page 10 posts #2 and #3 were just talking about the setup.
His post on page 12 he votes wercool who turned out to be a peasant.
After that it was night or he was dead. So I don't get it.
I want to draw attention to the last votes. Notice that RE offers an explanation for why he would vote wercool i.e. submarining. UTAlan doesn't offer any new evidence but says agreed and then votes him. Vodean doesn't even offer any explanation and votes him as well. I think that the general lack of willingness to offer any new idea or even rephrasing the accusation (by saying something like "submarining is scummy" or something like that) makes the bandwagon more scummy. Since there is some pressure on vodean, I willgregwolf121 wrote:^at 9:41 amRainbow Eater wrote:unvote vote wercool
inactivity stinks^at 9:52 amUTAlan wrote:Agreed. unvote vote wercoolRainbow Eater wrote:inactivity stinks^at 10:54 amvodean wrote:unvote vote werUTAlan wrote:Agreed. unvote vote wercoolRainbow Eater wrote:inactivity stinks
these are the last three votes on the wercool lynchfrom the posts it looks like he was agreeing with you that inactivity stinks, which seems to be the reason that you voted for wercool, now vodean should have checked how many votes wercool had to see if his would be the number seven but i doubt that anyone would take the time to go back and check the votes themselvesRainbow Eater wrote:
Anyways, Vote Vodean
very quick hammer and part of the colton bandwagon without any good reasons.
You are aware, that that is not the sort of claim people will be looking for, and that in this game claiming "town" is absolutely meaningless as the game appears to consist of the scum groups, the revolution and the peasants?vodean wrote:as for a claim, i claim TOWN!
OBVIOUSLY, town is peasants, as everyone else is mafia or cops... as for evidence, what do i have against F1fth. he never FOS'ed or foed me.spiesr wrote:You are aware, that that is not the sort of claim people will be looking for, and that in this game claiming "town" is absolutely meaningless as the game appears to consist of the scum groups, the revolution and the peasants?vodean wrote:as for a claim, i claim TOWN!
So you are saying that if you were mafia you would be so painfully obvious as to kill only those who had suspicions of you?vodean wrote:spiesr wrote:[quote="vodean"as for evidence, what do i have against F1fth. he never FOS'ed or foed me.
thats true... what is the case against me anyway? Isnt this BW a bit scummy. not really a case. Everyone says: yes, just to put the pressure, but the pressure's on, and i feel that theres no case, and i deflected everything you threw at me. FOS all who are voting/FOSing mespiesr wrote:So you are saying that if you were mafia you would be so painfully obvious as to kill only those who had suspicions of you?vodean wrote:spiesr wrote:[quote="vodean"as for evidence, what do i have against F1fth. he never FOS'ed or foed me.
Wow, scum failvodean wrote:thats true... what is the case against me anyway? Isnt this BW a bit scummy. not really a case. Everyone says: yes, just to put the pressure, but the pressure's on, and i feel that theres no case, and i deflected everything you threw at me. FOS all who are voting/FOSing mespiesr wrote:So you are saying that if you were mafia you would be so painfully obvious as to kill only those who had suspicions of you?vodean wrote:spiesr wrote:[quote="vodean"as for evidence, what do i have against F1fth. he never FOS'ed or foed me.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
how's that?colton24 wrote:Wow, scum failvodean wrote:thats true... what is the case against me anyway? Isnt this BW a bit scummy. not really a case. Everyone says: yes, just to put the pressure, but the pressure's on, and i feel that theres no case, and i deflected everything you threw at me. FOS all who are voting/FOSing mespiesr wrote:So you are saying that if you were mafia you would be so painfully obvious as to kill only those who had suspicions of you?vodean wrote:spiesr wrote:[quote="vodean"as for evidence, what do i have against F1fth. he never FOS'ed or foed me.
An all around OMGUS FOS? Pretty scummy. Ok, personally, you shouldn't have claimed so early. Unless you're at L-1, don't claim. Also, the reason why people are saying vanilla townie is a bad claim, is because there's no intrinsic value behind it. Nobody can counterclaim vanilla townie. Scum hide behind the vanilla townie claim all the time.vodean wrote:how's that?
oh, ok sorry. But if i did claim 26th movement, the members might take the risk of revealing themselves to kill me. Then id die anyway because my claim would be false...safariguy5 wrote:An all around OMGUS FOS? Pretty scummy. Ok, personally, you shouldn't have claimed so early. Unless you're at L-1, don't claim. Also, the reason why people are saying vanilla townie is a bad claim, is because there's no intrinsic value behind it. Nobody can counterclaim vanilla townie. Scum hide behind the vanilla townie claim all the time.vodean wrote:how's that?
Well, yes it is generally considered pretty scummy lie about your claim. I mean there are certain instances where it would be okay for someone to keep some information secret, but this clearly would not be one of those times. Also, your argument that the people FOS'ing you are somehow worse than those voting you doesn't really seem to hold water.vodean wrote:oh, ok sorry. But if i did claim 26th movement, the members might take the risk of revealing themselves to kill me. Then id die anyway because my claim would be false...
As For the FOS, its because there is NO evidence against me, but im getting FOSed and Voted anyway. The worst are the ones who Fos'ed me, because they're all non-commital, and if they're scum and this BW fails, they can jump on the next one.
