hwhrhett wrote:perchorin wrote:I couldn't agree more, this guy really needs to be the next to go.carmens wrote:I could spend all night gathering these comments. But enough is enough. People shouldn't have to put up with this.
mbohn2 was the first guy I ever put on my ignore list, and that was way back in 2006!
ha ha, ditto!!
mbohn2 - abusive in game chats [settled]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
- KoolBak
- Posts: 7413
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
lmao.....He was the first one on mine too back in '06! lololol
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
agreed same crime same punashmentjammyjames wrote:simple, FREDV11 got banned for flaming, so should mbohn in this case, if not then CC is f*cked up
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
I hate the way the guy treats players, but its so damn fun playing in his games, I just cant help myself at times.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Too much. I know.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
me too most of the time he just quits so i just get a free winAAFitz wrote:I hate the way the guy treats players, but its so damn fun playing in his games, I just cant help myself at times.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized.caymanmew wrote:no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalisedmbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad name
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilizedjefjef wrote:This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized.caymanmew wrote:no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalisedmbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad nameNow as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
uh no.. you messed up on what you said 
-
Strife
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Now something has kept me here too long.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.caymanmew wrote:you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilizedjefjef wrote:This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized.caymanmew wrote:no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalisedmbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad nameNow as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
my friends 7 year old brother has watch him playStrife wrote:The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.caymanmew wrote:you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilizedjefjef wrote:This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized.caymanmew wrote:no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalisedmbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad nameNow as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
The question still remains..... Is there a limit or standard? And if it's a personal attack is that allowed? FREDVIII wasn't allowed that leeway.Strife wrote:The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.caymanmew wrote:you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilizedjefjef wrote:This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized.caymanmew wrote:no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalisedmbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad nameNow as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are.
Last edited by jefjef on Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
No, this thread clearly isn't about their poor play.mbohn2 wrote:These people have nothing better to do than cry about their poor play?
This presumes that if they "hear it from strangers across the internet" that they WON'T go home and ask mommy...Strife wrote:The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.caymanmew wrote:you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilizedjefjef wrote:This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized.caymanmew wrote:no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalisedmbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad nameNow as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
and pluse it mean there mom going to ask were they heard it them the mom stop them from playing C.C.
- king achilles
- Support Admin

- Posts: 13486
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
But his best work is clearly in game chat, not the forums.king achilles wrote:mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.
Also I'm curious, is there any special reason why this one is tagged [settled] rather than [warned]?
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
Well I would guess that for appearances sake they had settled with a forum ban instead of an enforcement of the FREDVIII rule. C C might have new enforcement criteria now called the "baby steps rule enforcement". It starts with [settled].. then many [warnings].. then.........perchorin wrote:But his best work is clearly in game chat, not the forums.king achilles wrote:mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.
Also I'm curious, is there any special reason why this one is tagged [settled] rather than [warned]?
Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats
I don't remember for sure why this is, but it seems like (to my poor memory) that I was told making a game-chat ban was not possible at this time. I definitely may be wrong on that, though.perchorin wrote:But his best work is clearly in game chat, not the forums.king achilles wrote:mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.
Yeah, that didn't make a lot of sense to me either.perchorin wrote:Also I'm curious, is there any special reason why this one is tagged [settled] rather than [warned]?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.

