Conquer Club

mbohn2 - abusive in game chats [settled]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby KoolBak on Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:56 pm

lmao.....He was the first one on mine too back in '06! lololol

hwhrhett wrote:
perchorin wrote:
carmens wrote:I could spend all night gathering these comments. But enough is enough. People shouldn't have to put up with this.


I couldn't agree more, this guy really needs to be the next to go.
mbohn2 was the first guy I ever put on my ignore list, and that was way back in 2006!



ha ha, ditto!!
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class KoolBak
 
Posts: 7263
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Caymanmew on Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:52 pm

jammyjames wrote:simple, FREDV11 got banned for flaming, so should mbohn in this case, if not then CC is f*cked up

agreed same crime same punashment
Major Caymanmew
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 3209
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Ottawa

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby AAFitz on Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:59 pm

I hate the way the guy treats players, but its so damn fun playing in his games, I just cant help myself at times.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Caymanmew on Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:01 pm

AAFitz wrote:I hate the way the guy treats players, but its so damn fun playing in his games, I just cant help myself at times.

me too most of the time he just quits so i just get a free win
Major Caymanmew
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 3209
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Ottawa

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby jefjef on Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:26 pm

caymanmew wrote:
mbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad name


no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalised

This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized. :) Now as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are. ;)
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Caymanmew on Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:28 pm

jefjef wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
mbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad name


no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalised

This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized. :) Now as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are. ;)


you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilized
Major Caymanmew
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 3209
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Ottawa

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby jefjef on Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:33 pm

uh no.. you messed up on what you said ;)
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Strife on Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:37 pm

caymanmew wrote:
jefjef wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
mbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad name


no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalised

This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized. :) Now as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are. ;)


you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilized

The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.
Corporal Strife
 
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Caymanmew on Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:40 pm

Strife wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
jefjef wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
mbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad name


no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalised

This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized. :) Now as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are. ;)


you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilized

The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.


my friends 7 year old brother has watch him play
Major Caymanmew
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 3209
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Ottawa

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby jefjef on Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:01 pm

Strife wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
jefjef wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
mbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad name


no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalised

This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized. :) Now as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are. ;)


you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilized

The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.

The question still remains..... Is there a limit or standard? And if it's a personal attack is that allowed? FREDVIII wasn't allowed that leeway.
Last edited by jefjef on Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Woodruff on Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:17 pm

mbohn2 wrote:These people have nothing better to do than cry about their poor play?


No, this thread clearly isn't about their poor play.

Strife wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
jefjef wrote:
caymanmew wrote:
mbohn2 wrote:It's morons like carmens that give the site a bad name


no it people like you who give the site a bad name. is not a aldult site littel kids play to and should not have to hear your langeage it just ant sivalised

This is the english version of what caymanmew posted... No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear language that is not civilized. :) Now as I stated CC needs to make a stand and decide if FREDVIII ruling is the standard or if it depends on who you are. ;)


you messed up on what i said i said No, it's people like you who give the site a bad name. It is a site little kids play and should not have to hear your language it is not civilized

The site has a bad name? And so what if there's foul language, I highly doubt anyone younger than 10 plays this game. If so, better to learn it now from strangers across the internet than when their schoolyard chums say it and they go home and ask mommy.


This presumes that if they "hear it from strangers across the internet" that they WON'T go home and ask mommy...
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Caymanmew on Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:05 pm

and pluse it mean there mom going to ask were they heard it them the mom stop them from playing C.C.
Major Caymanmew
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 3209
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Ottawa

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby king achilles on Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:28 am

mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.
Image
Please don't have more than 1 account. If you have any CC concerns, you can contact us here.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby perchorin on Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:37 am

king achilles wrote:mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.

But his best work is clearly in game chat, not the forums. :roll:
Also I'm curious, is there any special reason why this one is tagged [settled] rather than [warned]?
Image
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
User avatar
Major perchorin
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:19 am
Location: Busan, South Korea

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby jefjef on Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:41 am

perchorin wrote:
king achilles wrote:mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.

But his best work is clearly in game chat, not the forums. :roll:
Also I'm curious, is there any special reason why this one is tagged [settled] rather than [warned]?

Well I would guess that for appearances sake they had settled with a forum ban instead of an enforcement of the FREDVIII rule. C C might have new enforcement criteria now called the "baby steps rule enforcement". It starts with [settled].. then many [warnings].. then......... ;) (depending upon who you are of course)
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: mbohn2 - abusive in game chats

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:49 pm

perchorin wrote:
king achilles wrote:mbohn2 has been given a short forum vacation for this.

But his best work is clearly in game chat, not the forums. :roll:


I don't remember for sure why this is, but it seems like (to my poor memory) that I was told making a game-chat ban was not possible at this time. I definitely may be wrong on that, though.

perchorin wrote:Also I'm curious, is there any special reason why this one is tagged [settled] rather than [warned]?


Yeah, that didn't make a lot of sense to me either.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Previous

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron