Losing armies to doubles partner
Moderator: Community Team
Losing armies to doubles partner
Concise description:
It doesn't make sense losing armies to your doubles partner. In a real battle the ally would give his territory to his/her partner. For example, in a recent game I had 10 armies in a territory and planned with my partner to take his 1 in another territory so that I could get the bonus. I lost 5 armies trying to take his 1. He should be able to just give me that territory. Completely changed our strategy because I didn't have enough to guard the land and we lost our bonus.
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
Doubles is a partners game and if your partner agrees to give you a territory, then you shouldn't lose armies taking it. I would suggest any territory that has 1 army, the partner should be able to take it without losing any armies. I say 1 because this would eliminate any abuse where a disgruntled player decides to wipe out his partner. Or maybe have a button that allows the partner to confirm and forfeit territory...something in those lines. This would make it easier to strategize in a doubles game.
It doesn't make sense losing armies to your doubles partner. In a real battle the ally would give his territory to his/her partner. For example, in a recent game I had 10 armies in a territory and planned with my partner to take his 1 in another territory so that I could get the bonus. I lost 5 armies trying to take his 1. He should be able to just give me that territory. Completely changed our strategy because I didn't have enough to guard the land and we lost our bonus.
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
Doubles is a partners game and if your partner agrees to give you a territory, then you shouldn't lose armies taking it. I would suggest any territory that has 1 army, the partner should be able to take it without losing any armies. I say 1 because this would eliminate any abuse where a disgruntled player decides to wipe out his partner. Or maybe have a button that allows the partner to confirm and forfeit territory...something in those lines. This would make it easier to strategize in a doubles game.
i still suck cock for a living
by jalen45
on Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:47 pm
by jalen45
on Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:47 pm
Hyasri wrote:Dont panic, I am here and active
Just taking my time to get familiar with everything rather than just rushing in and making some rash decisions.
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
Even the crickets got tired of chirping...so they went home.
i still suck cock for a living
by jalen45
on Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:47 pm
by jalen45
on Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:47 pm
Hyasri wrote:Dont panic, I am here and active
Just taking my time to get familiar with everything rather than just rushing in and making some rash decisions.
- Megadeth666
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:26 am
- Location: Windsor,Ontario
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
I like the idea...also I think if partners own a continent together they should be able to collect the bonus for it 
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
Who would collect the bonus?Megadeth666 wrote:I like the idea...also I think if partners own a continent together they should be able to collect the bonus for it
- pimpdave
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
- Contact:
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
The IRS, I would imagine...lancehoch wrote:Who would collect the bonus?Megadeth666 wrote:I like the idea...also I think if partners own a continent together they should be able to collect the bonus for it
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
-
blakebowling
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: 127.0.0.1
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
Whoever holds the majority of the territories would collect the bonus, if it is equal, the bonus would be split.lancehoch wrote:Who would collect the bonus?Megadeth666 wrote:I like the idea...also I think if partners own a continent together they should be able to collect the bonus for it
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
Ok, so how would you split the Queensland bonus on the Australia map: 8 territories, +5 bonus?blakebowling wrote:Whoever holds the majority of the territories would collect the bonus, if it is equal, the bonus would be split.
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
if its equal then maybe for arguement sake just let which ever person joined the game 1st that has the most armies on that territory to control itlancehoch wrote:Ok, so how would you split the Queensland bonus on the Australia map: 8 territories, +5 bonus?blakebowling wrote:Whoever holds the majority of the territories would collect the bonus, if it is equal, the bonus would be split.
and i think if this happened it should be a selection to wheter you or your team has to hold a bonus
- Megadeth666
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:26 am
- Location: Windsor,Ontario
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
I know a suggestion like this would never happen (since there is sooo many others that would be way easier to do and never will get done) but....a team should be 1, and any bonus is for the team, therefore all team mates are the same color and is awarded the bonus, and the next person who is playing can distribute the bonus accordingly.
- Thezzaruz
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: OTF most of the time.
- Contact:
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
Well there's your problem right there... Team rules isn't really for teams, alliances would be a more fitting word IMO.Megadeth666 wrote:a team should be 1
Re: Losing armies to doubles partner
Bonuses for Teams wouldn't work.
Drops in Quads would be completely unsurmountable - team that plays first would win - everytime.
C.
Drops in Quads would be completely unsurmountable - team that plays first would win - everytime.
C.

Highest score : 2297