Moderator: Tournament Directors



i know...Heavily influenced by the maps out there.Night Strike wrote:Your city choices suck, just to let you know. (I'm a midwest fan)
Oh well, put me in for the Seahawks.
And I'm going to lock and move your NYC Showdown thread.
Unfortunately that isn't one of the choices...there aren't any Boston Maps out therekillmanic wrote:in for any boston team but the bruins



When I first ask gameplayer about expanding his tournament, I suggested about 12-16 cities/regions... which ended up being between 350 and 500 players... which was crazy! We settled on this which is a lot more managable.Night Strike wrote: by Night Strike on Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:51 pm
Your city choices suck, just to let you know. (I'm a midwest fan)
Oh well, put me in for the Seahawks.
And I'm going to lock and move your NYC Showdown thread.


you could have had more cities, just less teams per... it would have allowed you to choose the best teams too...RedBaron0 wrote: When I first ask gameplayer about expanding his tournament, I suggested about 12-16 cities/regions... which ended up being between 350 and 500 players... which was crazy! We settled on this which is a lot more managable.
Those football teams you mentioned actually play in NJ.whitestazn88 wrote:not joining because i'm freemium, but i'd like to put in a suggestion.
instead of the liberty, maybe you could do the Giants or Jets? because really? no football team for the new york region is kinda a joke
philladelphia should not include the nets, in fact, they're changing their name to the brooklyn nets soon i believe, maybe you could use the AFL team the philadelphia soul?
and as for dc, the mystics should be replaced by either the ravens or the orioles.
i just don't think the wnba teams are worth-while, and the teams that i've mentioned might be a better fit in this male dominated website... and as for the nets, i dunno, i just don't really like the idea that you lump philly and nj together. it makes for a bad combination

