Tieryn wrote:Sydney flavoured.. hmm.... When you look at the map it needs to be unsmiling and you need to get the impression "This map is too important for you to play on"... (no offence to any Sydneysiders... hey, at least you're not Victorian )
Uh
Moderator: Cartographers
Tieryn wrote:Sydney flavoured.. hmm.... When you look at the map it needs to be unsmiling and you need to get the impression "This map is too important for you to play on"... (no offence to any Sydneysiders... hey, at least you're not Victorian )
edbeard wrote:cairnswk, in 2 player games, the territories are still given out in 1/3. The last 1/3 starts neutral.
cairnswk wrote:Tieryn wrote:Sydney flavoured.. hmm.... When you look at the map it needs to be unsmiling and you need to get the impression "This map is too important for you to play on"... (no offence to any Sydneysiders... hey, at least you're not Victorian )
Uh
cairnswk wrote:edbeard wrote:cairnswk, in 2 player games, the territories are still given out in 1/3. The last 1/3 starts neutral.
well there you go....thanks edbeard....still learning stuff....i wondered why there was so many neutrals on those 1vs1 games i'd been playing...but too stupid to ask
Tieryn wrote:cairnswk wrote:Tieryn wrote:Sydney flavoured.. hmm.... When you look at the map it needs to be unsmiling and you need to get the impression "This map is too important for you to play on"... (no offence to any Sydneysiders... hey, at least you're not Victorian )
Uh
This is a comment on sydney, not on the map
Mainly that whenever I've been to Sydney I've found the people too self-important, and concerned with their own worlds to even smile at a stranger on the street... Nothing like Perth or Bunbury at all. I have no idea how you'd convey that in graphics and it's more of a friendly dig at Sydney, rather than anything serious
lord voldemort wrote:cairnswk wrote:edbeard wrote:cairnswk, in 2 player games, the territories are still given out in 1/3. The last 1/3 starts neutral.
well there you go....thanks edbeard....still learning stuff....i wondered why there was so many neutrals on those 1vs1 games i'd been playing...but too stupid to ask
lmao nice
well living in sydney for 7 years good to see
will be interesting to see the interest for a city map
56 terrs would be good. still a really big 1v1 map. i wouldnt play anything over50 territories 1v1
but yer
bonus's need some work. and same with space issues. but this has already been said and im sure your working on that in the next update
lord voldemort wrote:Paramatta to circ que link to immitate the river cat??
umm perhaps somethin special about botany bay/oprah house/the zoo/olympic park???
like conneting them or giving them a bonus for touristy stuff...
just throwing around idea
cairnswk wrote:lord voldemort wrote:Paramatta to circ que link to immitate the river cat??
umm perhaps somethin special about botany bay/oprah house/the zoo/olympic park???
like conneting them or giving them a bonus for touristy stuff...
just throwing around idea
umm...i hadn't even registered with the parramatta river cat service link - good idea.
i really don't want to go any further than that with links and funny stuff as it gets too complicated for the "rug rats", not even gonna do train lines.
but keep them coming...you never know something simple might just click.
i know one thing, i'm gonna have to pull the harbor out a bit to give it more spread.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Kaplowitz wrote:A terit in Randwick has no name
Kaplowitz wrote:My bad, Mascot looked like two territories.
gimil wrote:2 basic geographic maps on the go cairns? Have you came off the artisit steroids?
Or have you just ran out of sherbert?
cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:2 basic geographic maps on the go cairns? Have you came off the artisit steroids?
Or have you just ran out of sherbert?
yes gimil...i ran out of sherbert...gimme me more more more more!!!!!
you forgot Galapagos, that's pretty basic....that's three....and later i will make it four with upper egypt
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
greenoaks wrote:why does Sydney stop at Parra ? what happened to Penriff & Campbelltown.
i thought it would be because of room but i read the entire thread before posting and noticed it was initially based on the olympics.cairnswk wrote:greenoaks wrote:why does Sydney stop at Parra ? what happened to Penriff & Campbelltown.
Thanks for posting greenoaks....answer...the same reason it doesn't include the Hawkesbury, Hornsby, LInfield, and all those other suburbs....i ran out of room.
This was also the original Sydney 2000 olympics map where only some of the major venues wer included in the map. Penrith wasn't included, nor was Campbelltown.
In order to include all those i'd have to make another sydney map and call it outer sydney.
greenoaks wrote:i thought it would be because of room but i read the entire thread before posting and noticed it was initially based on the olympics.cairnswk wrote:greenoaks wrote:why does Sydney stop at Parra ? what happened to Penriff & Campbelltown.
Thanks for posting greenoaks....answer...the same reason it doesn't include the Hawkesbury, Hornsby, LInfield, and all those other suburbs....i ran out of room.
This was also the original Sydney 2000 olympics map where only some of the major venues wer included in the map. Penrith wasn't included, nor was Campbelltown.
In order to include all those i'd have to make another sydney map and call it outer sydney.
as the rowing was held at Penrith's regatta centre & the equestrian was at the back of Fairfield/Liverpool somewhere. Horsley Park springs to mind. i think the shooting was out there somewhere too. so i thought i'd ask.
great looking map. looking forward to owning all of Sydney.
shadowsteel9 wrote:I like it, it just seems a bit cluttered
Users browsing this forum: No registered users