Silent option
Moderator: Community Team
-
JTKALLTHEWAY
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:58 pm
- Location: San Antonio, TX
Silent option
I would like to see an option for no chat in certain games, or more particularly, whenever there are 3 players left in a game. I've only been here a short time, but have already lost several games that I REALLY should have and deserved to win because the other two players began to verbally conspire against me. I don't have a problem if it happens naturally, but one player reasoning another into it kinda blows. Has this kind of thing been sugg. before? I like 3 player games too, but I will not play them anymore because of this.
Re: Silent option
It's allowed to form alliances, when you post them in the chat.
-
Ronaldinho
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Dorset, England.
Re: Silent option
This isent very well put my friend. People will start using pm's or a messanger to allie each other. I believe if you really feel strongly then ost for a new option. NO alliances. This probs wont be accepted but there are quite a few who feel alliances are bad for the game and they HATE it.JTKALLTHEWAY wrote:I would like to see an option for no chat in certain games, or more particularly, whenever there are 3 players left in a game. I've only been here a short time, but have already lost several games that I REALLY should have and deserved to win because the other two players began to verbally conspire against me. I don't have a problem if it happens naturally, but one player reasoning another into it kinda blows. Has this kind of thing been sugg. before? I like 3 player games too, but I will not play them anymore because of this.

the alliances are all part of the game. You just have to make them work for you, and not abuse it. Most of my games go without any chat beyond spam, but there are some, where i put more energy into an alliance than i do the moves...if you play 2 good players in 3 player, you almost dont have to though, they will almost automatically hit the strongest player, unless there's a set of cards involved...
also, some people will kill someone to spite them for asking them to do something, so you never know how its going to go....your goal should be to find a way to win, assuming the weaker players are going to gang up on you...because invariably....they are
also, some people will kill someone to spite them for asking them to do something, so you never know how its going to go....your goal should be to find a way to win, assuming the weaker players are going to gang up on you...because invariably....they are
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Too much. I know.
- joeyjordison
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:10 am
Agreed - I still like the idea of a no alliance option - more so players who don't like alliances can play together. I hate alliances outside of team games with a venganceKoolBak wrote:Or simply find a group of friends that believe allainces SUCK and play the game on their own merit, like we do in xigames......good luck-
Tals