What if the map madal was changed to work with a % of maps with unique defeats rather than a set number? So if you wanted to maintain your map medal you had to try new maps as they came out? (probably a suggestion for another thread)
In terms of platinum I don't see why we can't have them for all medals, but only if they were at a very very large number. So that they were not an easy jump from gold to platinum.
gimil wrote:What if the map madal was changed to work with a % of maps with unique defeats rather than a set number? So if you wanted to maintain your map medal you had to try new maps as they came out? (probably a suggestion for another thread)
In terms of platinum I don't see why we can't have them for all medals, but only if they were at a very very large number. So that they were not an easy jump from gold to platinum.
This idea (in my opinion) is better than kyles, but still has the problem that medals could need to be taken away.
gimil wrote:What if the map madal was changed to work with a % of maps with unique defeats rather than a set number? So if you wanted to maintain your map medal you had to try new maps as they came out? (probably a suggestion for another thread)
In terms of platinum I don't see why we can't have them for all medals, but only if they were at a very very large number. So that they were not an easy jump from gold to platinum.
This idea (in my opinion) is better than kyles, but still has the problem that medals could need to be taken away.
In terms of cross maps it encourages me people to play more maps (and to continue to try new maps). So in this case I think that taking away of this paticular medal may not be a bad thing.