ratings
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Re: ratings
***
***
***
Rocket.
***
***
Rocket.
Re: ratings
i do five stars for the first game so i know ive played them before, and after the second game i will change it if they deserve it. (bad player, bad tude) and then i will attach tags to.
-
Selucid Empire
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:30 pm
Re: ratings
I also give 5 stars because... well... what assumptions do you make going into a game with someone? Do you want them to talk alot... all this stuff that they may or may not know you want them to do? A good game could be a quiet game, a talkative one, a humerous one.
If someone decides to talk and uses the chat to complain or object... then yeah... I might rate them neutral.
If they are hostile or rude then I would rate them accordingly. But all in all I give a benifit of the doubt 5 stars.
-------------------------
Someone might play a great game and just because I'm talkative and they're not doesn't mean I would rate them the same way I would rate someone who complained about the dice or the drop. I certainly wouldn't rate a quiet player the same way I would rate a rude hostile player.
-------------------------
Now I'm interested in this thread. If someone is quiet and they play an average game, do you consider the average game to be worthy of 5 stars... it's easy to pick out games that are deserving of bad ratings, but how do you judge between an exceptional game (5 stars) and an average 3 star game? For me I give 5 stars unless I feel otherwise obligated. I've never given 3 stars. If it's not a bad game, it's a good game.
If someone decides to talk and uses the chat to complain or object... then yeah... I might rate them neutral.
If they are hostile or rude then I would rate them accordingly. But all in all I give a benifit of the doubt 5 stars.
-------------------------
Someone might play a great game and just because I'm talkative and they're not doesn't mean I would rate them the same way I would rate someone who complained about the dice or the drop. I certainly wouldn't rate a quiet player the same way I would rate a rude hostile player.
-------------------------
Now I'm interested in this thread. If someone is quiet and they play an average game, do you consider the average game to be worthy of 5 stars... it's easy to pick out games that are deserving of bad ratings, but how do you judge between an exceptional game (5 stars) and an average 3 star game? For me I give 5 stars unless I feel otherwise obligated. I've never given 3 stars. If it's not a bad game, it's a good game.
-
Thezzaruz
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: OTF most of the time.
- Contact:
Re: ratings
And this is why the rating system has broken down and become useless.Selucid Empire wrote:I also give 5 stars because... well... what assumptions do you make going into a game with someone? Do you want them to talk alot... all this stuff that they may or may not know you want them to do? A good game could be a quiet game, a talkative one, a humerous one.
If someone decides to talk and uses the chat to complain or object... then yeah... I might rate them neutral.
If they are hostile or rude then I would rate them accordingly. But all in all I give a benifit of the doubt 5 stars.
Giving someone a 5 for "Attitude" is supposed to mean that he/she is among the nicest people you have meet here on CC but for some reason no one does it that way. Oh well the old feedback system wasn't much good either so we didn't lose much really.
