Sarah Palin 2008!
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
RustyMonkey
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:46 pm
Sarah Palin 2008!
There are lots of people saying that Palin hasn't captured the liberals or feminists votes. What isn't looked at is the fact that the Mothers and I are inspired by Sarah Palin and we will all be voting for the Palin / McCain ticket in mass on voting day.
Who would want to capture the hearts of liberals or feminists anyway? We should be shipping them off to camps, not supporting their ungodly beliefs.
Who would want to capture the hearts of liberals or feminists anyway? We should be shipping them off to camps, not supporting their ungodly beliefs.
- pancakemix
- Posts: 7973
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The Grim Guzzler
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
Something tells me Palin isn't going for liberals...
Epic Win
"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross
"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
McCain/Palin isn't about feminists or liberals. McCain has a lot of independents already. Palin was a choice to shore up his pro gun, anti abortion (read: southern evangelical) base of the Rep party that has turned its back on McCain.
Do you ever watch the news?
Do you ever watch the news?

nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
Too bad you'd be supporting, among other things, the abolition of the freedom of the press.RustyMonkey wrote:There are lots of people saying that Palin hasn't captured the liberals or feminists votes. What isn't looked at is the fact that the Mothers and I are inspired by Sarah Palin and we will all be voting for the Palin / McCain ticket in mass on voting day.
Who would want to capture the hearts of liberals or feminists anyway? We should be shipping them off to camps, not supporting their ungodly beliefs.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
-
RustyMonkey
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:46 pm
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
uhh... if we didn't have freedom of the press then how am i posting this?Too bad you'd be supporting, among other things, the abolition of the freedom of the press.
lol.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
I have a a great idea. Let' have John McCain die, have Palin take over, and really see how bad things can get. if Palin becomes president in a heartbeat (or lack of one), then I think george Bush will come off the list of worst president.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
QFTjnd94 wrote:I have a a great idea. Let' have John McCain die, have Palin take over, and really see how bad things can get. if Palin becomes president in a heartbeat (or lack of one), then I think george Bush will come off the list of worst president.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
-
RustyMonkey
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:46 pm
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
That would be great. Notice I said Palin / McCain 08. It would be better if Palin were the frontrunner. She knows where to take this country.I have a a great idea. Let' have John McCain die, have Palin take over, and really see how bad things can get. if Palin becomes president in a heartbeat (or lack of one), then I think george Bush will come off the list of worst president.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
RustyMonkey wrote:That would be great. Notice I said Palin / McCain 08. It would be better if Palin were the frontrunner. She knows where to take this country.I have a a great idea. Let' have John McCain die, have Palin take over, and really see how bad things can get. if Palin becomes president in a heartbeat (or lack of one), then I think george Bush will come off the list of worst president.
Either you didn't read my post, or you are just blabbering about your flawed opinions.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
And I suppose the librarian who nearly lost her job because Palin didn't get what she wanted (banning books) is laughing out loud about her potentially being the president of the United States?RustyMonkey wrote:uhh... if we didn't have freedom of the press then how am i posting this?Too bad you'd be supporting, among other things, the abolition of the freedom of the press.
lol.
Here's a thought. How about we don't vote with out vaginas.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
-
bbqpenguin
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:11 am
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
she's sure pulled my horny college student vote 
-
RustyMonkey
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:46 pm
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
The librarian was busy peddling smut while children were reading it and Palin tried to do the right thing.And I suppose the librarian who nearly lost her job because Palin didn't get what she wanted (banning books) is laughing out loud about her potentially being the president of the United States?
Try reading up on your "sources" before trying to argue, and I don't mean drudge news.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
So what were these books, you labeled them smut so obviously you are familiar with the titles.RustyMonkey wrote:The librarian was busy peddling smut while children were reading it and Palin tried to do the right thing.And I suppose the librarian who nearly lost her job because Palin didn't get what she wanted (banning books) is laughing out loud about her potentially being the president of the United States?
Try reading up on your "sources" before trying to argue, and I don't mean drudge news.
Im a TOFU miSfit
- b.k. barunt
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
First of all, reading any of the McCain vs Obama drivel is like watching a debate between Tweedledum and Tweedledee (with Beevis and Butthead as moderators). Two sides of the same coin, genius.RustyMonkey wrote:There are lots of people saying that Palin hasn't captured the liberals or feminists votes. What isn't looked at is the fact that the Mothers and I are inspired by Sarah Palin and we will all be voting for the Palin / McCain ticket in mass on voting day.
Who would want to capture the hearts of liberals or feminists anyway? We should be shipping them off to camps, not supporting their ungodly beliefs.
Secondly, anyone who could be "inspired" by either Palin or Hillary could also be seduced by Kermit the Frog. I'm afraid to ask, really, but i'm afraid not to ask for fear of what my imagination might conjure up - What do you mean by "Mothers (why capitalized?) and i ? * * shudders in perverse anticipation of something really sick and lame * *
Honibaz
- Dancing Mustard
- Posts: 5442
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
- Location: Pushing Buttons
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
This line almost guaranteed that this would be a quality troll thread.RustyMonkey wrote:Who would want to capture the hearts of liberals or feminists anyway? We should be shipping them off to camps, not supporting their ungodly beliefs.
Bravo sir! A welcome change from your usual copypasta. This truly is a new string to your bow, and a welcome breath of fresh air for us all.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
- Bertros Bertros
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:30 am
- Location: Riding the wave of mediocrity
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
She's inspired me to put some dollar on the outcome. Obama has goofed it already and she, as unelectable as she is to most of us, is just perfect for the crazys who care enough to vote on mass. Maybe you can convince some of those who don't care enough to be crazy, and form the silent 45% who don't vote then moan about the republicans to get off their exercise bikes and do something about it, but I say give it up already, get yourself over to betfair for some decent odds against Obama and at least profit out of the whole debacle. That way you can upgrade your power to consume high fructose corn syrup, which is... totally natural and made from corn. Sweet.
-
RustyMonkey
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:46 pm
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
Democrats want to save criminals and murder babies.
uhh im not sure if i follow but haven't you seen the commercial? There is nothing wrong with high fructose corn syrup you people are all just overreacting. its good for you, its made from corn.That way you can upgrade your power to consume high fructose corn syrup, which is... totally natural and made from corn. Sweet.
- Bertros Bertros
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:30 am
- Location: Riding the wave of mediocrity
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
Of course it is, it said so on the TV right? Oh and thank you, you have truly made my day. You can sleep well tonight in the knowledge you gave one of your transatlantic neighbours a warm glow.RustyMonkey wrote:Democrats want to save criminals and murder babies.
uhh im not sure if i follow but haven't you seen the commercial? There is nothing wrong with high fructose corn syrup you people are all just overreacting. its good for you, its made from corn.That way you can upgrade your power to consume high fructose corn syrup, which is... totally natural and made from corn. Sweet.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
I'm with you Rusty!
Though I don't actually think women should even have a vote.
Though I don't actually think women should even have a vote.
- b.k. barunt
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
I don't think anyone should have a vote - the Amerikan people have shown the world that they are incapable of rational thought. Buncha wankers.
Honibaz
Honibaz
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
Eight years of a jerk who claims god called him to the white house is enough. Palin should be sent back to the fundamentalist reactionaries she belongs with.
- sheepofdumb
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Look at that otter wiggle!
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
http://politsk.blogspot.com/2008/09/sarah_13.html
It's a Sarah Palin baby name generator. Just call me Skein Chug Palin.
It's a Sarah Palin baby name generator. Just call me Skein Chug Palin.
I AM MASTER SHEEP, TEH AWESOME
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
What are you??? like in highschool? if you paid attention at all you would see what she is really after. By the sound of it your pretty close to a femenist

Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
Totally agreed...b.k. barunt wrote:I don't think anyone should have a vote - the Amerikan people have shown the world that they are incapable of rational thought. Buncha wankers.
Honibaz
Why is it that 95% (This might be a shade low) of the western world wanted Bush to not be reelected - and this time want McCain to not be elected...
Yet only 50% of Americans think this way?
C.

Highest score : 2297
Re: Sarah Palin 2008!
Sarah Palin: My understanding is that Rick Davis recused himself from the dealings of the firm. I don't know how long ago, a year or two ago that he's not benefiting from that. And you know, I was - I would hope that's not the case.Sarah Palin talks to Katie Couric about the economy...
Katie Couric: But he still has a stake in the company so isn't that a conflict of interest?
Palin: Again, my understanding is that he recused himself from the dealings with Freddie and Fannie, any lobbying efforts on his part there. And I would hope that's the case because, as John McCain has been saying, and as I've on a much more local level been also rallying against is the undue influence of lobbyists in public policy decisions being made.
Next, Couric asked about the $700 billion government bailout of bad debt - and whether she supports it.
Palin: I'm all about the position that America is in and that we have to look at a $700 billion bailout. And as Sen. McCain has said unless this nearly trillion dollar bailout is what it may end up to be, unless there are amendments in Paulson's proposal, really I don't believe that Americans are going to support this and we will not support this. The interesting thing in the last couple of days that I have seen is that Americans are waiting to see what John McCain will do on this proposal. They're not waiting to see what Barack Obama is going to do. Is he going to do this and see what way the political wind's blowing? They're waiting to see if John McCain will be able to see these amendments implemented in Paulson's proposal.
Couric: Why do you say that? Why are they waiting for John McCain and not Barack Obama?
Palin: He's got the track record of the leadership qualities and the pragmatism that's needed at a crisis time like this.
Couric: But polls have shown that Sen. Obama has actually gotten a boost as a result of this latest crisis, with more people feeling that he can handle the situation better than John McCain.
Palin: I'm not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who's more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who's actually done it?
Couric: If this doesn't pass, do you think there's a risk of another Great Depression?
Palin: Unfortunately, that is the road that America may find itself on. Not necessarily this, as it's been proposed, has to pass or we're going to find ourselves in another Great Depression. But, there has got to be action - bipartisan effort - Congress not pointing fingers at one another but finding the solution to this, taking action, and being serious about the reforms on Wall Street that are needed.
Couric: Would you support a moratorium on foreclosures to help average Americans keep their homes?
Palin: That's something that John McCain and I have both been discussing - whether that ... is part of the solution or not. You know, it's going to be a multi-faceted solution that has to be found here.
Couric: So you haven't decided whether you'll support it or not?
Palin: I have not.
Couric: What are the pros and cons of it do you think?
Palin: Oh, well, some decisions that have been made poorly should not be rewarded, of course.
Couric: By consumers, you're saying?
Palin: Consumers - and those who were predator lenders also. That's, you know, that has to be considered also. But again, it's got to be a comprehensive, long-term solution found ... for this problem that America is facing today. As I say, we are getting into crisis mode here.
Couric: You've said, quote, "John McCain will reform the way Wall Street does business." Other than supporting stricter regulations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac two years ago, can you give us any more example of his leading the charge for more oversight?
Palin: I think that the example that you just cited, with his warnings two years ago about Fannie and Freddie - that, that's paramount. That's more than a heck of a lot of other senators and representatives did for us.
Couric: But he's been in Congress for 26 years. He's been chairman of the powerful Commerce Committee. And he has almost always sided with less regulation, not more.
Palin: He's also known as the maverick though, certainly taking shots from the other party. Trying to get people to understand what he's been talking about - the need to reform government.
Couric: But can you give me any other concrete examples? Because I know you've said Barack Obama is a lot of talk and no action. Can you give me any other examples in his 26 years of John McCain truly taking a stand on this?
Palin: I can give you examples of things that John McCain has done, that has shown his foresight, his pragmatism, and his leadership abilities. And that is what America needs today.
Couric: I'm just going to ask you one more time - not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation.
Palin: I'll try to find you some and I'll bring them to you.
Katie Couric: You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?
Sarah Palin: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and, on our other side, the land-boundry that we have with Canada. It's funny that a comment like that was kinda made to … I don't know, you know … reporters.
Couric: Mocked?
Palin: Yeah, mocked, I guess that's the word, yeah.
Couric: Well, explain to me why that enhances your foreign-policy credentials.
Palin: Well, it certainly does, because our, our next-door neighbors are foreign countries, there in the state that I am the executive of. And there…
Couric: Have you ever been involved in any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?
Palin: We have trade missions back and forth, we do. It's very important when you consider even national-security issues with Russia. As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right next to, they are right next to our state.
Katie Couric: Why is it much more challenging there? Can you explain that?and Afganistan
Sarah Palin: The logistics that we are already suggesting here, not having enough troops in the area right now. The… things like the terrain even in Afghanistan and that border between Pakistan and Afghanistan, where, you know, we believe that-- Bin Laden is-- is hiding out right now and… and is still such a leader of this terrorist movement. There… there are many more challenges there. So, again, I believe that… a surge in Afghanistan also will lead us to victory there as it has proven to have done in Iraq. And as I say, Katie, that we cannot afford to retreat, to withdraw in Iraq. That's not gonna get us any better off in Afghanistan either. And as our leaders are telling us in our military, we do need to ramp it up in Afghanistan, counting on our friends and allies to assist with us there because these terrorists who hate America, they hate what we stand for with the… the freedoms, the democracy, the… the women's rights, the tolerance, they hate what it is that we represent and our allies, too, and our friends, what they represent. If we were… were to allow a stronghold to be captured by these terrorists then the world is in even greater peril than it is today. We cannot afford to lose in Afghanistan.
