SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:49 pm

Its seems the only fair solution.
Well, the sensible solution would be to re-instate Wicked, but folks round here have too much false pride to reverse decisions.
So firing Twill in the interests of Community Harmony seems the way forward.
Any thoughts on his leaving present?

pimphawks70 · Post by **pimphawks70** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:52 pm

I couldn't agree more

Twill is gay while wicked rocks

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:54 pm

I find it hard to rail against twill given he's so rarely seen, and hasn't had a history of making controversial decisions.

That said, boo, hiss, down with that sort of thing.

decoulombe · Post by **decoulombe** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:55 pm

I dunno man,

I like them both. Maybe they should share equal powers....lol

jpliberty · Post by **jpliberty** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:56 pm

Why is it people would want to see anyone fired?

It's an owner's job to give and to take away. It's not a customer decision.

Complaints are an appropriate way to register disapproval. Suggested solutions are appropriate, but should not include urged firings, as that is not in customer hands.

Plus, it's just ugly.

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:58 pm

jpliberty, don't try and restore sense to the argument, that's not fun.

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:59 pm

qeee1 wrote:jpliberty, don't try and restore sense to the argument, that's not fun.

haha yes, rise to the incoherent babbleing!

P.S.
FREE WICKED!

Incandenza · Post by **Incandenza** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:18 pm

wicked > twilldo

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:22 pm

qeee1 wrote:I find it hard to rail against twill given he's so rarely seen, and hasn't had a history of making controversial decisions....

Hah!

Hasn't eh?!

decoulombe · Post by **decoulombe** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:24 pm

decoulombe wrote:I dunno man,

I like them both. Maybe they should share equal powers....lol

Sorry, I had no idea what happened. Forgive me all.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:34 pm

Incandenza wrote:wicked > twilldo

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:37 pm

Where's the poll

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:41 pm

The way this will be dealt with is standard is that all the threads will be merged and they'll slowly hope the issue will die down, except in this case rather than the banning of norse which just annoyed the entire chatter box community this new measureship had affected the general chat crew, the map foundry and the live chat too. Hopefully the decision will be overturned soon... The community has spoken!!!

fireedud · Post by **fireedud** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:45 pm

nagerous wrote:The way this will be dealt with is standard is that all the threads will be merged and they'll slowly hope the issue will die down, except in this case rather than the banning of norse which just annoyed the entire chatter box community this new measureship had affected the general chat crew, the map foundry and the live chat too. Hopefully the decision will be overturned soon... The community has spoken!!!

HELL YEA!!

[scottish accent]THEY'LL NEVER TAKE OUR FREEDOM!![/scottish accent]

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:47 pm

you guys are idiots.

i'm off to bed.

Matroshka · Post by **Matroshka** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:48 pm

Not downing on anyone, but there is always another side to a story...

Rabble Rabble though

The Chosen One · Post by **The Chosen One** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:49 pm

jpliberty wrote:Why is it people would want to see anyone fired?

It's an owner's job to give and to take away. It's not a customer decision.

Complaints are an appropriate way to register disapproval. Suggested solutions are appropriate, but should not include urged firings, as that is not in customer hands.

Plus, it's just ugly.

It's also the owner's responsibility to keep his PAYING customers happy and that ain't happening here.

truly_tasha · Post by **truly_tasha** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:06 pm

I am ashamed to have given my money to a company that would treat their employees so badly and unfairly.

jako · Post by **jako** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:14 pm

truly tasha. a real shame.

richardgarr · Post by **richardgarr** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:35 pm

This whole situation, sounds like personalities have stomped all over someone who does a great job, and that is a crying shame.
I cannot count how many times wicked has found and busted multis in live chat. She is very much a front line service Mod, and as a result is in the spotlight more then others.
Perhaps this front line exposure has at times put her in positions that made her an easy target to the Trolls , cheats, and general asses, that are, and always will be a part of the CC community, and as a result allowed this situation to escalate.
It is a sad thing to see her being judged by so few people, and not being recognized for all the time, effort and good work she has done here. (Which btw does not get the same kind of exposer, that the negative stuff does.)
Wicked is the first one on the scene and is not afraid to call it as it is. So as a result ruffles feathers from time to time.

I was once told : "That if the people you have power over all like you, that you are doing your job wrong." ( Congratulations wicked, you must have been doing a better job then anyone realized, Sorry it resulted in this type of short sited decision.)
I feel this is a great loss to the community as a whole, and I fear that all the little things she has been doing, will get left undone.
I do not know the whole story, but I do know that wicked has done way more good for CC, then bad.
Shame on you Admins, for tossing aside a great asset. Shame

azezzo · Post by **azezzo** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:39 pm

keep wicked.
shes one of the few mods with a set of balls.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:47 pm

richardgarr wrote: "That if the people you have power over all like you, that you are doing your job wrong."

That is one messed up quote.

nesterdude · Post by **nesterdude** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:53 pm

suggs wrote:Its seems the only fair solution.
Well, the sensible solution would be to re-instate Wicked, but folks round here have too much false pride to reverse decisions.
So firing Twill in the interests of Community Harmony seems the way forward.
Any thoughts on his leaving present?

That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.

hwhrhett · Post by **hwhrhett** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:57 pm

nesterdude wrote:
suggs wrote:Its seems the only fair solution.
Well, the sensible solution would be to re-instate Wicked, but folks round here have too much false pride to reverse decisions.
So firing Twill in the interests of Community Harmony seems the way forward.
Any thoughts on his leaving present?
That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.

ha ha ha ha ha

Timminz · Post by **Timminz** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:57 pm

Fircoal wrote:
richardgarr wrote: "That if the people you have power over all like you, that you are doing your job wrong."
That is one messed up quote.

Seriously. Who said that, originally?

SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?

Re: SHOULD LACK FIRE TWILL?