Hi,
I am new to this game. In one of my current games, two players are targetting me openly and have a truce kind of agreement between themselves.
Is this allowed openly. If not , isn't this an unfair practice in the spirit of the game ?
Query [settled]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Re: Query
If you feel that the conduct of the other players is in violation of the above rule. Then please post with the following form:Rules Page wrote:Rule #2: No secret diplomacy
Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating attacks. Secret diplomacy can be hard to prove, but if you suspect it you should leave the players in question appropriate ratings. If you feel certain about players engaging in secret diplomacy consider reporting them in the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum by posting a new topic.
Name(s) of Accused:
Suspected of: (delete what does not apply) Multi/Secret Alliance/Abuse/Other
Related Games:
Comments:
Re: Query
I read the game chats from the Classic Map, the openly posted that both green and blue wish to have a truce since you ( red i believe ) is getting too strong. It's allowed, however if both of them started to attack you with any chats of truces then that what we call a Secret Alliance
- king achilles
- Support Admin

- Posts: 13462
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Query [No Form]
Based from the game chat in game 2823897, if this is indeed the game amitsa was referring to, then this case has been settled.