USA Domination
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- magneticgoop
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
- Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(
USA Domination
I saw it on a show called the power of ten and thought it was a good question.
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.

- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
- misterman10
- Posts: 9412
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Out on the Pitch.
- Contact:
- High Guard
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:58 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL.
- magneticgoop
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
- Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(
So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
- High Guard
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:58 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL.
30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
"To win without risk is to triumph without glory."
Pierre Corneille (1606 - 1684)
Pierre Corneille (1606 - 1684)
- OnlyAmbrose
- Posts: 1797
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm
IT is, but then again, we are dealing with Americans. <_<High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Though there would be some heavy resistance from many countries before that would happen, and at best, it would probably end up like the UN or something.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
- High Guard
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:58 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL.
It will happen evidentially, the question is will it happen before we annihilate each other.muy_thaiguy wrote:Though there would be some heavy resistance from many countries before that would happen, and at best, it would probably end up like the UN or something.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
"To win without risk is to triumph without glory."
Pierre Corneille (1606 - 1684)
Pierre Corneille (1606 - 1684)
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Only time will tell.High Guard wrote:It will happen evidentially, the question is will it happen before we annihilate each other.muy_thaiguy wrote:Though there would be some heavy resistance from many countries before that would happen, and at best, it would probably end up like the UN or something.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
- static_ice
- Posts: 9174
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am
Where are you getting 52 from?Titanic wrote:Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
52 states...The USA could just "disband" and make each state a "country" so then each state has 1 vote each as they are now countries, meaning that what used to be USA now has 52 votes rather then just the 1.Arbustos wrote:Where are you getting 52 from?Titanic wrote:Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
-
Ronaldinho
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Dorset, England.
Re: USA Domination
magneticgoop wrote:I saw it on a show called the power of ten and thought it was a good question.
I will die before my country is taking over by you yanks!
God bless the Queen of England,

Silly English k-nnnnnigt, we only have 50.Titanic wrote:52 states...The USA could just "disband" and make each state a "country" so then each state has 1 vote each as they are now countries, meaning that what used to be USA now has 52 votes rather then just the 1.Arbustos wrote:Where are you getting 52 from?Titanic wrote:Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
- magneticgoop
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
- Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(
that is why we have 2 sections of congress in the senate there are 2 senators for every state, in the house of representatives there are 435 representatives plus 4 Delegates and 1 Resident Commissioner that are based on percentages of population. so the small states get more power in the senate and the large states get more power in the house. but that is how it originally was intened now it is just politics and you could vote against a fellow state member to gain power for the political partyTitanic wrote:52 states...The USA could just "disband" and make each state a "country" so then each state has 1 vote each as they are now countries, meaning that what used to be USA now has 52 votes rather then just the 1.Arbustos wrote:Where are you getting 52 from?Titanic wrote:Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.

- magneticgoop
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
- Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(
- static_ice
- Posts: 9174
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am
- GreecePwns
- Posts: 2646
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lawn Guy Lint
With the current leader, I wouldn't want to live...
nucular
nucular
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
- High Guard
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:58 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL.
If the do that they would loose their power, there will simply be 52 small votes each on their own.Titanic wrote:Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.High Guard wrote:30% That's a pretty big numbermagneticgoop wrote:now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure nowHigh Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?
No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.Fircoal wrote:So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
BTW 52?
"To win without risk is to triumph without glory."
Pierre Corneille (1606 - 1684)
Pierre Corneille (1606 - 1684)
