a discussion about SJW's
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
a discussion about SJW's
Seems relevant considering opinions on here.
Re: a discussion about SJW's
I give it maximum two weeks before waauw starts spamming OT with pepe frogs.
- DirtyDishSoap
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Hard list to pick off of.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.


Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:



Boggles the fuckin mind.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.
Spoiler




Spoiler




Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
- Bernie Sanders
- Posts: 5084
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm
Re: a discussion about SJW's
The above post boggles the mind.DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:Spoiler
Boggles the fuckin mind.Spoiler

Too many young white guys are so upset that they are losing their WHITE PRIVILEGE.
Stop your whining and crying DDS or I might have to send you to bed. Grow a couple and for GODSAKE! stop your whimpering!
Re: a discussion about SJW's
mrswdk wrote:I give it maximum two weeks before waauw starts spamming OT with pepe frogs.

Re: a discussion about SJW's
I don't know about you people, but the Fat Acceptance groups are definitely the most hilarious.
-
tzor
- Posts: 4051
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Long Island, NY, USA
- Contact:
Re: a discussion about SJW's
You are missing a whole number of groups.
If they were on the list I would vote for the Anti-Fa
They make great cake toppers.
If they were on the list I would vote for the Anti-Fa
They make great cake toppers.

Re: a discussion about SJW's
To people who dislike anti-fascists:


the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Hams down it's the fat acceptance movement.

Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Mm mm ham.Skoffin wrote:Hams down it's the fat acceptance movement.
- Thorthoth
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 1:36 pm
- Location: My pyramid in Asgard, beside the glaciated Nile.
Re: a discussion about SJW's
All the heads of the hydra are attached to the same body... and yes, it is fat.
THORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTH
-
TA1LGUNN3R
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
- Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Don't fret. The nature of extremist political views is such that the pendulum will swing and leave them in the dust soon enough.DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:Spoiler
Boggles the fuckin mind.Spoiler
But maybe there will be a real war and things will shake up all the softness.
-TG
-
TA1LGUNN3R
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
- Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Self-loathing cunt. Go be a meek turd and lickspittle, it's all you're good at.Bernie Sanders wrote:
The above post boggles the mind.
Too many young white guys are so upset that they are losing their WHITE PRIVILEGE.
Stop your whining and crying DDS or I might have to send you to bed. Grow a couple and for GODSAKE! stop your whimpering!
-TG
- luns101
- Posts: 2196
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Oceanic Flight 815
- Contact:
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Pretty much spot on, young man. Although I'd support safe spaces for craft beer sampling.DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:Spoiler
Boggles the fuckin mind.Spoiler
Re: a discussion about SJW's
up yer kilt? or something like that, right?Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Re: a discussion about SJW's
Churchill took food from India thereby starving tens of millions of people to death, because he thought it was more important that British people have the food.Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:
- DirtyDishSoap
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: a discussion about SJW's
And China has bread lines and violently puts protests down. (Ghulja/Tiananmen Square Incident). Because China gives two shits about it's populace.mrswdk wrote: Churchill took food from India thereby starving tens of millions of people to death, because he thought it was more important that British people have the food.
Go ho somewhere else.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Re: a discussion about SJW's
>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
- DirtyDishSoap
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: a discussion about SJW's
>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Symmetry brought up Churchill as an example of an anti-fascist and I expressed doubts about Churchill's integrity. Simmer down darling.DirtyDishSoap wrote:>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Oh dear, don't get upset when the shoe is on the other foot in mouth, mrs.mrswdk wrote:Symmetry brought up Churchill as an example of an anti-fascist and I expressed doubts about Churchill's integrity. Simmer down darling.DirtyDishSoap wrote:>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
I may be mixing my metaphors, but dear god, I love it.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
-
tzor
- Posts: 4051
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Long Island, NY, USA
- Contact:
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Churchill stood against everything the so called "anti-Fa" stands for. Just saying.Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:
Most people do not understand where Fascism came from. (From the failed to materialize revolutions that Marxism had predicted.) They don't know how it evolved to "national" socialism as opposed to the "international - class based" socialism of Communism. They don't understand the tactics of fascists. As a result it isn't obvious to them that the anti-fa is in fact a Fascist organization (that can't even make the trains run on time).

Re: a discussion about SJW's
That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence that he was opposed to democracy and in favour of the Fascist states that he lead a country to war against than your usual confused nonsense on this one.tzor wrote:Churchill stood against everything the so called "anti-Fa" stands for. Just saying.Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:
Most people do not understand where Fascism came from. (From the failed to materialize revolutions that Marxism had predicted.) They don't know how it evolved to "national" socialism as opposed to the "international - class based" socialism of Communism. They don't understand the tactics of fascists. As a result it isn't obvious to them that the anti-fa is in fact a Fascist organization (that can't even make the trains run on time).
It's a big claim you're making, after all.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence
https://gwydionwilliams.com/44-fascism- ... mussolini/Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.
In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.
Re: a discussion about SJW's
Gwydion Williams? Never heard of the guy. Opinions aren't evidence MR.mrswdk wrote:Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidencehttps://gwydionwilliams.com/44-fascism- ... mussolini/Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.
In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein

