CEO slariaeiresi, post the dumbest shit that comes to mind

[BigBallinStalin]

In my opinion, her djh an HERHRR<, people tjhat kjd hhave certain ksills.... GET PAID TOO MUCHQ!!

RARRRR!!!

WAHHHHH!!!!!


People with skills get paid too mUCHH!!! And I want minimum wage laws!! myehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,,,,

[TA1LGUNN3R]

I want to discuss CEO celery and men in tights.

-TG

[kentington]

I'd rather be pissed off than pissed on.

[john9blue]

it's tuesday dude, put down the bottle

[krusher]

I'd rather be pissed off than pissed on.

priceless

[Funkyterrance]

Free Markets are a limitless resource!

[patches70]

I'd rather be pissed off than pissed on.

Though....people tend to get pissed off when they've been pissed on......

[john9blue]

I'd rather be pissed off than pissed on.

- direct quote from the legend himself

[Army of GOD]

everything that comes to my mind is the "dumbest" shit

[Haggis_McMutton]

1. "God is, or He is not"
2. A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up.
3. According to reason, you can defend either of the propositions.
4. You must wager. (It's not optional.)
5. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.
6. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force, when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain.

Most retarded argument that is actually seriously used in religious debates.

[warmonger1981]

Pissed off like a condom.

[john9blue]

1. "God is, or He is not"
2. A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up.
3. According to reason, you can defend either of the propositions.
4. You must wager. (It's not optional.)
5. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.
6. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force, when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain.

Most retarded argument that is actually seriously used in religious debates.

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

[Haggis_McMutton]

1. "God is, or He is not"
2. A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up.
3. According to reason, you can defend either of the propositions.
4. You must wager. (It's not optional.)
5. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.
6. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force, when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain.

Most retarded argument that is actually seriously used in religious debates.

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

^ good to see you're keeping on topic.

[john9blue]

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

^ good to see you're keeping on topic.

...this thread had a topic?

[kentington]

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

^ good to see you're keeping on topic.

...this thread had a topic?

I think he is saying your post must have been the dumbest crap that came to mind. See title thread.

[john9blue]

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

^ good to see you're keeping on topic.

...this thread had a topic?

I think he is saying your post must have been the dumbest crap that came to mind. See title thread.

oh, well in that case his lack of understanding of pascal's wager gives him a commanding lead.

[AAFitz]

I value BBS's insight on capitalism and the free market, because it is so well researched and unbiased.

[AAFitz]

1. "God is, or He is not"
2. A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up.
3. According to reason, you can defend either of the propositions.
4. You must wager. (It's not optional.)
5. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.
6. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force, when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain.

Most retarded argument that is actually seriously used in religious debates.

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

That doesnt mean its not a stupid argument, because the tails of that coin for many means living a life of complete ignorance, and in many cases, outright delusion.

[Army of GOD]

why is ignorance a bad thing? Isn't happiness the point of life?

[john9blue]

why is ignorance a bad thing? Isn't happiness the point of life?

it's not a bad thing unless it affects others.

this is why those who think religious people are ignorant often try to justify their hatred and superiority complexes by claiming that religion "poisons everything" or whatever. it "validates" their hatred.

[Haggis_McMutton]

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

^ good to see you're keeping on topic.

...this thread had a topic?

I think he is saying your post must have been the dumbest crap that came to mind. See title thread.

oh, well in that case his lack of understanding of pascal's wager gives him a commanding lead.

Funny, the earliest interaction I remember with you was debating Pascal's Wager, maybe like 3-4 years ago. You were still defending it and I was still saying it is an impressively bad argument.

Tell you what, start a thread on Pascal's wager if you want. I wager I can show it's idiotic in at least 3 independent ways.

[AAFitz]

why is ignorance a bad thing? Isn't happiness the point of life?

it's not a bad thing unless it affects others.

this is why those who think religious people are ignorant often try to justify their hatred and superiority complexes by claiming that religion "poisons everything" or whatever. it "validates" their hatred.

Well, that certainly qualifies for this thread, but just to point out some ignorance here, the word many, meant that many religious people are ignorant, which is most certainly true, not all.

As far as hatred, Id say many religious people have cornered that market, but if you were referring to my quote, I was religious for quite some time.

Circular reference encountered.

[BigBallinStalin]

it's funny how people don't understand that this isn't an argument for the existence of god, it's an argument for why you should believe in god.

^ good to see you're keeping on topic.

...this thread had a topic?

I think he is saying your post must have been the dumbest crap that came to mind. See title thread.

oh, well in that case his lack of understanding of pascal's wager gives him a commanding lead.

Funny, the earliest interaction I remember with you was debating Pascal's Wager, maybe like 3-4 years ago. You were still defending it and I was still saying it is an impressively bad argument.

Tell you what, start a thread on Pascal's wager if you want. I wager I can show it's idiotic in at least 3 independent ways.

Oh yeah? You wouldn't stand a chance--not a chance!! <waves fist>

[GreecePwns]

Viceroy.

[Haggis_McMutton]

why is ignorance a bad thing? Isn't happiness the point of life?

So, you're saying you'd take the blue pill?