51 total games: each clan picks 1/2 games. To be fought in 3 rounds. Approx 1 week between rounds.
18 Doubles
18 Trips
14 Quads
Game 51: Trips - classic map - ns - chained - fog. (use of map does not count towards map limit)
Round 1: 6 dubs - 6 trips - 6 quads (1/2 each clan)
Round 2: 6 dubs - 6 trips - 6 quads (1/2 each clan)
Round 3: 6 dubs - 6 trips - 2 quads (1/2 each clan) + game 51 Classic (to be made by trailing clan)
All games to be sequential - Auto - No Speed - No Nuclear - Unlimited may be used in quads only. No fog rule in effect.
Each map may be chosen twice per clan - once per team size. 18 game limit per player. If limit exceeded game will be replayed. Special allowance: MB may use classic 4 times: 2 dubs, 1 trip and 1 quad.
jigger1986 wrote:Good luck to both clans. Gonna have to pick KOA on this one, but am excited to see what the Bastards can do!
There will be considerations given to MB for their limited experiences and KOA will also be actively fielding several players that have yet to really participate in a clan war.
We definitely just became stronger with greenoaks joining us! Hopefully that will be enough to offset IcePack's participation.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
In CC's infinite wisdom, in order to have game privs issued now, the tie breaker, which is intended to only be played if there is a tie, now must be scheduled and made and played, even if it's 49-1, the extra game must be played or they will not issue game privs, in their infinite wisdom, because I guess there is some kind of issue in re of tie breakers but who really knows, I am just trying to follow the guidelines, so the "tie breaker" is going to be made in round 3 and will be a home game of the trailing team. In case it is tied come round 3 maybe we should have a tie breaker creator tie break game. But if we do who makes that one?
Makes sense to me.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:In CC's infinite wisdom, in order to have game privs issued now, the tie breaker, which is intended to only be played if there is a tie, now must be scheduled and made and played, even if it's 49-1, the extra game must be played or they will not issue game privs, in their infinite wisdom, because I guess there is some kind of issue in re of tie breakers but who really knows, I am just trying to follow the guidelines, so the "tie breaker" is going to be made in round 3 and will be a home game of the trailing team. In case it is tied come round 3 maybe we should have a tie breaker creator tie break game. But if we do who makes that one?
Makes sense to me.
4. The clan war must be of a minimum 41 games for 2 clans and must provide a winner during the regular flow of the war. Tie-breakers will no longer be allowed for Clan Wars in order to facilitate future implementations.
Thank you for acknowledging our infinite wisdom. We really appreciate it. Good luck to both clans.
jefjef wrote:In CC's infinite wisdom, in order to have game privs issued now, the tie breaker, which is intended to only be played if there is a tie, now must be scheduled and made and played, even if it's 49-1, the extra game must be played or they will not issue game privs, in their infinite wisdom, because I guess there is some kind of issue in re of tie breakers but who really knows, I am just trying to follow the guidelines, so the "tie breaker" is going to be made in round 3 and will be a home game of the trailing team. In case it is tied come round 3 maybe we should have a tie breaker creator tie break game. But if we do who makes that one?
Makes sense to me.
4. The clan war must be of a minimum 41 games for 2 clans and must provide a winner during the regular flow of the war. Tie-breakers will no longer be allowed for Clan Wars in order to facilitate future implementations.
Thank you for acknowledging our infinite wisdom. We really appreciate it. Good luck to both clans.
THIS IS A 50 GAME WAR! Ooops 51. Thanks for infinitely pointing out the 41 game rule though...
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:In CC's infinite wisdom, in order to have game privs issued now, the tie breaker, which is intended to only be played if there is a tie, now must be scheduled and made and played, even if it's 49-1, the extra game must be played or they will not issue game privs, in their infinite wisdom, because I guess there is some kind of issue in re of tie breakers but who really knows, I am just trying to follow the guidelines, so the "tie breaker" is going to be made in round 3 and will be a home game of the trailing team. In case it is tied come round 3 maybe we should have a tie breaker creator tie break game. But if we do who makes that one?
Makes sense to me.
4. The clan war must be of a minimum 41 games for 2 clans and must provide a winner during the regular flow of the war. Tie-breakers will no longer be allowed for Clan Wars in order to facilitate future implementations.
Thank you for acknowledging our infinite wisdom. We really appreciate it. Good luck to both clans.
THIS IS A 50 GAME WAR! Thanks for pointing out the 41 game rule though...
You are only reading the first part of the sentence...
41 or more games...check.
AND
Provides a winner in the regular flow of the war...now, check.
Tie-breakers that start after a tie at the end of the war are no longer allowed. They must be played within the body of the war. So far you are the only one that has had a problem with this and I really don't understand the opposition.
jj wrote:I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue.
Good luck KOA! I think we are going to need it...
Have a nice day!
.............................................................................................................. Last edited by jj on Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: removed infinite flames.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
...)
