Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

emelar · Post by **emelar** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:01 pm

I would like to nominate myself for chairman of the SoC's new committee for decorum, sobriety, ettiquette, and formality.

My credentials are impeccable.

I give my permission for the sensible supporters here to reply with your support.

No, No, don't thank me. I'm happy to be available as the obvious choice for the position.

mpjh · Post by **mpjh** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:12 pm

That position is only available to a premium cook.

lt.Futt · Post by **lt.Futt** » Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:49 am

Rank and membership aside! emelar is a obvious choice. emelar somehow is www. He could decorate what ever with text - very effective!

oldrisky44 · Post by **oldrisky44** » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:45 am

I think we should make an exception to the rule about rank and membership status with the proviso that emelar must write a 5000 word essay explaining in vague detail how he qualifies and explain exactly what he plans to do with his new powers and also express what positive changes he plans to make within the CC community at large.

mpjh · Post by **mpjh** » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:48 am

Yes, absolutely, then seal it inside a coded tube and geo-cache it. Tell the members its longitude and latitude and shoot the member that finds it.

oldrisky44 · Post by **oldrisky44** » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:53 am

You kill me! LOL!

macbone · Post by **macbone** » Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:52 am

Sorry, emelar, I already called dibs.

Risky, your word count requirement is a little low. Emelar usually has that by the time the second person goes in a trips game.

oldrisky44 · Post by **oldrisky44** » Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:06 pm

Exactly the reason for the LOW word count! It will supremely challenge him to limit himself to a mere 5000 words.

I was holding my breath waiting for this reveal.

lt.Futt · Post by **lt.Futt** » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:17 pm

oldrisky44 wrote:Exactly the reason for the LOW word count! It will supremely challenge him to limit himself to a mere 5000 words.

Pardon me. I don`t exactly think you know what you`re talking about. Limit emelar? To 5000 words?

Acutally that`s a good one.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Limit emelar to 5000 words! Best ever! By far!

OMFG Limit emelar to 5000 ....

mpjh · Post by **mpjh** » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:41 am

Emelar, I think you have fallen in with some sarcastic sobs. Fortunately, we can be sarcastic in two sentences.

macbone · Post by **macbone** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:38 am

I for one welcome our new dictator, er, I mean, chairman of the board of decency, fair play, and windy anecdotes.

lilrvrgrl · Post by **lilrvrgrl** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:41 pm

emelar wrote:I would like to nominate myself for chairman of the SoC's new committee for decorum, sobriety, ettiquette, and formality.

My credentials are impeccable.

I give my permission for the sensible supporters here to reply with your support.

No, No, don't thank me. I'm happy to be available as the obvious choice for the position.

OK um, all but the sobriety part.

macbone · Post by **macbone** » Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:28 am

Lilrvrgrl, you'll never meet someone as serious-minded as our dear emelar. He's the poster child.

oldrisky44 · Post by **oldrisky44** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:43 am

I was hoping this thread would be more active. -nudge-

macbone · Post by **macbone** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:37 am

Aw, no one asked me what poster. =)

lilrvrgrl · Post by **lilrvrgrl** » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:10 pm

oldrisky44 · Post by **oldrisky44** » Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:26 am

Brings me back to 1984.

lt.Futt · Post by **lt.Futt** » Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:58 am

Alfred E. Neuman.

In the Norwegian version of MAD there was a Forum "readers" sent letters that were printed. The editors with Alfred E. Neuman was suppose to respond to. Ragna Sovepose (Ragna Sleeping Bag), always sent the most far out questions. In the respondings to Ragna Sleeping Bag the editors failed so bad in hiding their frustration.

macbone · Post by **macbone** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:54 pm

I move that we vote on Chairman of the SoC decorations or whatever it is.

mpjh · Post by **mpjh** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:38 pm

What is society decorum -- certainly not the handshake.

macbone · Post by **macbone** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:58 am

Perhaps the jacket?

mpjh · Post by **mpjh** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:14 am

–noun
1.
dignified propriety of behavior, speech, dress, etc.
2.
the quality or state of being decorous; orderliness; regularity.
3.
Usually, decorums. an observance or requirement of polite society.

decorum at a war game site -- Sort of reminds me of why everyone was so extraordinarily polite in Viet Nam -- everyone was armed.

lt.Futt · Post by **lt.Futt** » Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:25 am

mpjh wrote:
–noun
1.
dignified propriety of behavior, speech, dress, etc.
2.
the quality or state of being decorous; orderliness; regularity.
3.
Usually, decorums. an observance or requirement of polite society.
decorum at a war game site -- Sort of reminds me of why everyone was so extraordinarily polite in Viet Nam -- everyone was armed.

Or Klinger from M.A.S.H.

How about use text as decorum?

oldrisky44 · Post by **oldrisky44** » Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:29 am

How can we have a vote, there is only one person running?

And he hasn't submitted his essay yet.

mpjh · Post by **mpjh** » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:24 am

omg -- don't ask for an essay

Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum

Re: Chairman of SoC committee on decorum