Civilitas High - Lesson 3: Maths

[Loose Canon]

Can't see DDS video - not that I think it will add anything.
Everything he does or doesn't do makes me more suspicious of him.

Charle was a perfect fall guy for mafia - no powers in his reveal.
But if I had been in mafia chat with him - believe me I would have argued against his janitor thing, not sure about his history teacher claim or his note received thing, but I would have waited for a claim to get off the vote on him D1.
Didn't DDS get off the Charle vote D1 following the claim?
But then go suspicious on Charle whilst hedging his bets by going suspicious on others too.
That all seemed so fake to me.

And Hjelp going back to an angle I think you were considering.
Its fairly standard play on this site for 1 mafia to be on mafia lynch votes and DDS is an old hand on this site.

[DirtyDishSoap]

Geeze, you're really going to spam nonsense until you're lynched. I'm pretty close to just ignoring you again until the end of the game at this point.

You'd have to do some real stretching to get to those conclusions.

Nevermind that you failed to answer Hjelp in any meaningful way.

[hjelp]

The votes I presented were the final votes for Charle D2 and so far LC D3.

[Loose Canon]

Hjelp what questions havent i answered you in a meaningful way?

I mean dds is throwing around i havent.
Think he is just trying to keep any focus away from himself.

But happy to answer you hjelp if you think i havent?

[hjelp]

@Loose Canon
Why did you make such a fuzz about the lynch of Charle?

[Loose Canon]

I was too unsure that the lynch was correct is the short answer.

Longer answer is around what I was thinking at different points within D1 and D2.
D1 there was a dynamic of a mafia Charle couldn't be so dumb could he, and no I don't agree with what DDS is saying I don't agree with the strategy he is saying I don't trust DDS I'm uncomfortable being in any alignment with him right now.
D2 that dynamic was more powerful.
More powerful because waiting for and initially missing Charle's information then on reading it I presumed if Charle had been mafia he would have discussed what he was going to do with Mafia before doing it and making his reveal and I came to the conclusion it might have been made up but it was also credible or too incredible to have been made up. (I will point out I was asking Charle some questions around it) I thought the "information could have been a greencheck on Charle by another player - a 1 shot investigative Charle can only receive the note/gossip if town aligned.
A mislynch of a town and truthful Charle given his claims would have been a big mislynch.
More powerful re suspicions of DDS too. There's such a lot he was saying and portraying I didn't and don't agree with around what this game is about. I'm rock solid that this is not a wallflowers are innocent game. He even went so far as to cut off discussions. He'd been making assertions about certainties he couldn't have had and which closed off lines of probing and discussion. I suspected DDS more than Charle.
I do suspect DDS more than anyone else.

[hjelp]

… He'd been making assertions about certainties he couldn't have had …

How do you know that for sure?

[Ragian]

Sub work in progress. Hang tight.

[Loose Canon]

Hjelp

Dds did go probably not max, its not max, i was 100% not max.

Dds has said this is a vanilla game - it isnt and bunnys reveal only makes sense, i think if there is an investigative she could have protected at some point.

Wallflowers dont make sense as all vanillas. Persuading investigatives not to look at wallflowers and keeping as many true wallflowers in with fake one, would be the play for a mafia armef with a fake wallflower claim

Fpd by principal

[hjelp]

And how many wallflowers are claimed? Still in game.

[DirtyDishSoap]

Sub work in progress. Hang tight.

Thanks Rags.

[DirtyDishSoap]

Guess I'm forced to respond to give context to the replacement.

Dds did go probably not max, its not max, i was 100% not max.

I did. What's your point? That I looked at Maxs read on DJ and put two and two together?

Dds has said this is a vanilla game - it isnt and bunnys reveal only makes sense, i think if there is an investigative she could have protected at some point.

Jesus, I'm sick of refuting this.

Two scenarios for Bunny.

1. She got targeted.
2. She protected and sacrificed herself. (Pretty sure it's this, I don't know why she would be targeted).
Can only speculate.

Once again dds you are pushing this you and other wallflowers are town.

You wouldnt talk when challenged d2.

All this game is a vanilla game you have been peddling - well it clearly isnt

I didn't realize you were going to self implode the moment I ignored you so cheers.

I'm pushing the wallflower thing because it has so far proven to be our best bet in confirming town. Why you push back on this idea is probably because something along the lines of "Well, town figuring out who is who goes against I play, grr mad!"

I never claimed this a complete vanilla game. It's a "More or Less" plain game, verbatim. So far it clearly shows that is the case.
Wallflowers = Townies/Vanilla Town
Charle = Cheerleader/Goon
HotBunny = Hippie/Bodyguard
Annie = Angry Teen. This is the only one so far that broke norms. I've never seen a role that operates like this, or at least going off of the top of my head, plays something like a Jester or something. It's not normal/vanilla.

This is why I don't want to engage with you. This just detracts from actual scum hunting and goes back full circle of previous arguments that just devolve into "nuh uh!" "ya huh!" Pick someone else.

Standing up against what i believe is wrong.

There cant be flavoured vanillas without mafia having such power to blend in. It is not a vanilla game.
Dds whole power of arguments and persuasion is predicated that it is. Dds is either mafia or will lead town to defeat. A mafia ragian argued & persuaded town to defeat last game.

This aged nicely considering I had Charle pegged the beginning of D2.

If you're too lazy to read this from one page ago, idk what to tell you.

Wallflowers dont make sense as all vanillas. Persuading investigatives not to look at wallflowers and keeping as many true wallflowers in with fake one, would be the play for a mafia armef with a fake wallflower claim

Why doesn't it make sense? Rags could have said we're all a bunch of napkins, just happens to be the flavor. You trying to discredit it, but say you're also vanilla while also claiming you know how many scum there are is pretty damn weak and silly argument.

I never said invests should not invest wallflowers? Quote that, show the class where I specially said that.

Annnnd that's why I think Loose is pretty much just scum trying to save a sinking ship.

[Loose Canon]

What makes sense about making however many vanillas there are wallflower flavoured vanillas.
Thatd be mod error by an experienced mod.

And as an old hand at this you damned well know it dds.

[DirtyDishSoap]

It isnt. It can either be a blanket term or a named individual. In this case, it appears to be blanket.

[DirtyDishSoap]

And if you disagree with me on that, PM Rags and complain about it.

[hjelp]

@LC
Who are they?

And how many wallflowers are claimed? Still in game.

[homer_jay]

this back and forth seems to be repetitive and going nowhere. i'm not convinced enough to drop the hammer to LC (i think he's at L-1, but haven't had mod confirmation on that). but the fact he's been there means something.

he's scum so the other remaining scum isn't putting in the 5th vote
the two scum are a combination of the inactives and those that have already voted.

would be nice if we had less in the inactives list so we could narrow it down somewhat