Roarfirstholliday wrote:PATIENCE!!!!
Captain+2008 Winter Doubles League [WINNER: Forefall, Mozes]
Moderator: Tournament Directors
- nesterdude
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:32 pm
- Location: Babylon aka Washington, DC
- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
- fishydance
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Mini-soda (basically southern Canada)
Re: Captain+ 2008 Winter Doubles League - ROUND 2 Started
Read first page carefully:
AndrewB wrote:Points Transfer
1. The 50% of points difference will be transfered to the next round.
Example: Let say you got 8 MP in your group. And the lowest qualifying team amongst all groups got 5 MP. So you get 1.5=(8-5)*50% MP transfered to the next round.

- fishydance
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Mini-soda (basically southern Canada)
Re: Captain+ 2008 Winter Doubles League - ROUND 2 Started
Thanks Andy, I should have read the rules more carefully before posting! I'm not a mathmetician, but I don't see how we ended up with 0 carried forward, when we had 4.2 MP in round 1. On the other hand, at least we can't go down can we?AndrewB wrote:Read first page carefully:
AndrewB wrote:Points Transfer
1. The 50% of points difference will be transfered to the next round.
Example: Let say you got 8 MP in your group. And the lowest qualifying team amongst all groups got 5 MP. So you get 1.5=(8-5)*50% MP transfered to the next round.
- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
LOL, Does it mean that someone is afraid, huh? 
Well, it is kind of complicated, but is defined in the regulations:
Sorted the teams by the MPs first, then by rating.
After that assigned numbers 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 against each team from top to bottom. That gave me the new groups. (1/2/3/4)
Hope it all makes sense...
Well, it is kind of complicated, but is defined in the regulations:
So, in order to define new groups I did the following:AndrewB wrote:7. Groups will be assigned by previous round results and team rating. (First team will play with last).
Sorted the teams by the MPs first, then by rating.
After that assigned numbers 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 against each team from top to bottom. That gave me the new groups. (1/2/3/4)
Hope it all makes sense...

- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
AndrewB wrote:LOL, Does it mean that someone is afraid, huh?
Well, it is kind of complicated, but is defined in the regulations:
So, in order to define new groups I did the following:AndrewB wrote:7. Groups will be assigned by previous round results and team rating. (First team will play with last).
Sorted the teams by the MPs first, then by rating.
After that assigned numbers 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 against each team from top to bottom. That gave me the new groups. (1/2/3/4)
Hope it all makes sense...
very affraid...
+ the difference you took with you from the previous round doesn't makes it easier.
-
michiganfan22
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:34 pm
- Location: Rochester, NY
- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
good griefAndrewB wrote:We have an another drop-off: Mike Doherty
Looking for a partner for Frop now...
I am finishing the tourney out, but if things like this continue, i doubt i will join the next one, so frustrating
so, if no one replaces him, does his team just cancel all games?
or from now on if any members quit, there team gets penalized, not sure why so many start something then quit, any way you can make a stiff rule to prevent this neo? or if you make tounreys in the future, can the main team, state or post a sub in advance so we dont have to keep dragging this out and waiting?

- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
Blitzaholic wrote:good griefAndrewB wrote:We have an another drop-off: Mike Doherty
Looking for a partner for Frop now...how many players quitting on you in this neo? does that make 10 total now?
I am finishing the tourney out, but if things like this continue, i doubt i will join the next one, so frustrating
so, if no one replaces him, does his team just cancel all games?
or from now on if any members quit, there team gets penalized, not sure why so many start something then quit, any way you can make a stiff rule to prevent this neo? or if you make tounreys in the future, can the main team, state or post a sub in advance so we dont have to keep dragging this out and waiting?
We can continue... Frop just found another partner. Surfingmace will join.
I hope that you don't mean that I am doing my job bad.Blitzaholic wrote:good griefAndrewB wrote:We have an another drop-off: Mike Doherty
Looking for a partner for Frop now...how many players quitting on you in this neo? does that make 10 total now?
I am finishing the tourney out, but if things like this continue, i doubt i will join the next one, so frustrating
so, if no one replaces him, does his team just cancel all games?
or from now on if any members quit, there team gets penalized, not sure why so many start something then quit, any way you can make a stiff rule to prevent this neo? or if you make tounreys in the future, can the main team, state or post a sub in advance so we dont have to keep dragging this out and waiting?
Unfortunately in any tournaments there are drop offs. Especially in the size of 100 people when we started. So having 10 people drop-off makes it 10% of the original players.
Anyhow, the replacement was found, furthermore, it was found within the given timeframe. So you didn't wait any longer, then expected. Most of the replacements were done in the timely manner. So I am not sure where this frustration is coming from...

- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
ok, ty 1st holiday, frop and surfingfirstholliday wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:good griefAndrewB wrote:We have an another drop-off: Mike Doherty
Looking for a partner for Frop now...how many players quitting on you in this neo? does that make 10 total now?
I am finishing the tourney out, but if things like this continue, i doubt i will join the next one, so frustrating
so, if no one replaces him, does his team just cancel all games?
or from now on if any members quit, there team gets penalized, not sure why so many start something then quit, any way you can make a stiff rule to prevent this neo? or if you make tounreys in the future, can the main team, state or post a sub in advance so we dont have to keep dragging this out and waiting?
We can continue... Frop just found another partner. Surfingmace will join.
this is a super tournament and neo does hard work and bothers me that many sign up for this and 10 or so quit was all, glad to see he joined

- Genghis Khan CA
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:19 pm
I'm sure he doesn't andrew... nothing you can do about people dropping out.AndrewB wrote:I hope that you don't mean that I am doing my job bad.
Unfortunately in any tournaments there are drop offs. Especially in the size of 100 people when we started. So having 10 people drop-off makes it 10% of the original players.
Anyhow, the replacement was found, furthermore, it was found within the given timeframe. So you didn't wait any longer, then expected. Most of the replacements were done in the timely manner. So I am not sure where this frustration is coming from...
Blitz - I know it's frustrating, but I think it's always going to be a fact of life in a long-running tournament that players drop out, not much anyone can do about it - penalising is an option although that punishes the remaining partner more than the drop-out, and might encourage both partners to drop out rather than just one.
So long as replacements are organised in a timely fashion, the impact should hopefully be fairly minimal on the remaining players. Andrew seems to be doing a good job of making sure this is taken care of
Highest score: 562
Highest place: 16590
Highest rank: Private
Highest place: 16590
Highest rank: Private

