so what? it's always nice to have a few negs. if you have something like 100 positives and 0 negs people won't even bother looking at them.
Feedback is a joke
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
- DiM
- Posts: 10415
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: making maps for scooby snacks
feedback is not really that important. many people have negative feedbacks as jokes. (me for example)
so what? it's always nice to have a few negs. if you have something like 100 positives and 0 negs people won't even bother looking at them.
so what? it's always nice to have a few negs. if you have something like 100 positives and 0 negs people won't even bother looking at them.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
I just wanted to give an example of when the feedback mods do a good job.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I got the most positive feedbacks on this site by far and I got to agree with you. I think the system is not used and monitered properly. I played almost 8,000 games and left almost no feedback but when I do, there is always some kind of catch 22 phrase on why the feedback is not factual. Your documentation can be filled with 100% accurate facts and its still not acceptable. I dont know if Lack has SOP's that are used for deleting feedback or if the mods use their best judgement, but I dont think it is being done properly. Now I do send in alot of e-tickets to have feedback removed, but every case it is because the player complained about a non speed game not being played real time. So I do think they should be deleted, but to delete a feedback only on the fact that because a player is not eliminated in a game yet that makes the feedback not factual is rediculous. What am I to do? What until the player is eliminated and than leave the feedback? If so, than why do I have the availability to leave the feedback when im eliminated and the game is still not over? Than the other player beats me to the punch and I cant leave one or its revenge feedback. Too many loopholes in this system.
Although I think the feedback system has its problems, I recently had a negative feedback removed by the mods. In fact, I think its the one that JR is referring to.
Since JR has a history of editing out what he wrote in his deleted feedbacks (of which he has many), I thought I'd post it here:
Deleted he sends out a full scale suicide attack because the games was taking too long to finish. After his rediculous attack, he was left with 5,000 armies while the other 2 players remaining have over 15K leaving himself no chance to win the game all because he no longer wanted to play the game.If he wasnt interested in playing those game options than he should have never joined the game. It is well known that those options could be played for long periods of time and he gave up and quit. this was not fair to myself and the other players remaining in the game even though one of them still has a chance to win the game and I feel feedback should be left to warn other players that this may happen to them too. it was mentioned in the game log to play a 2nd game to determine the winner of this game.IM TOLD THIS IS NOT FACTUAL BECAUSE HE IS NOT ELIMINATED FROM THE GAME YET. UNGODDAM REAL. WHY EVEN BOTHER LEAVING FEEDBACK IF I HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL HE IS ELIMINATED
Deleted by moderator for this reason: Not factual
Absolutely false claim and a perfect example of when a feedback should be removed.
I won that game in which I supposedly "suicided" and had "no chance" of winning. And now I'm on his ignore list? I wonder if its because I "suicided" or because JR is is 0-4 against me in singles.
- KoE_Sirius
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:08 pm
- Location: Somerset
Re: Feedback is a joke
QFT-100% true.Who was it ?..I'll leave him negative too.sideoutshu wrote:I left someone a negative saying they "missed multiple turns during a crucial point in the game" which was completely 100% true. Apparently, this guys complained about it and I get a message saying the feedback was removed becasue it was "trivial and not accurate".
Are you freaking kidding me? How is one player out of three remaining missing multiple turns "trivial"? Cause if that is trivial I would like to see what is "important". Christ, I have gotten negative feedback for telling someone they made a stupid move but something that actually effects the outcome is trivial? Gimme a break. Why not just get rid of the feedback section all together?
WHEN ARE FEEDBACK MODERATORS GOING TO BUTT OUT?
Highest Rank 4th.
- hundredand1aces
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:04 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Ok so I miss 15-20 minutes of a game and Minister misses 50 minutes thats the same as 10 turns in a freestyle game.....jmho what ever I think the mods did him a favor as "his mom unplugged the router by mistake" and yall feel sorry for him and remove his 30 plus negs........wicked wrote:Your definition of deadbeating is incorrect. Deadbeating = getting kicked out for missing 3 consecutive turns.
"Unwritten Rules"
"Obviously any gross abuse of the game is forbidden. This includes but is not limited to: throwing games, intentional deadbeating, serial teammate killing, hijacking accounts."
So I guess your unwritten rules are just a load of crap then.......as in no way did I intentionally deadbeat....
Last edited by hundredand1aces on Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Risktaker17
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:09 am