USA Domination

Gold Knight · Post by **Gold Knight** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:51 pm

Arbustos wrote:
Titanic wrote:
Arbustos wrote:
Titanic wrote:
High Guard wrote:
magneticgoop wrote: now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure now
30% That's a pretty big number

Fircoal wrote: So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.
Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.
Where are you getting 52 from?
52 states...The USA could just "disband" and make each state a "country" so then each state has 1 vote each as they are now countries, meaning that what used to be USA now has 52 votes rather then just the 1.
Silly English k-nnnnnigt, we only have 50. (Plus D.C.)

Now leave, before I taunt you, a second time...

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:08 pm

Arbustos wrote:
Titanic wrote:
Arbustos wrote:
Titanic wrote:
High Guard wrote:
magneticgoop wrote: now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure now
30% That's a pretty big number

Fircoal wrote: So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.
Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.
Where are you getting 52 from?
52 states...The USA could just "disband" and make each state a "country" so then each state has 1 vote each as they are now countries, meaning that what used to be USA now has 52 votes rather then just the 1.
Silly English k-nnnnnigt, we only have 50. (Plus D.C.)

no it's 69

radiojake · Post by **radiojake** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:06 pm

I'm glad to see that no-one has voted yes

It would be a massively arrogant act for America (or any country) to try to run the entire planet

Titanic · Post by **Titanic** » Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:03 am

High Guard wrote:
Titanic wrote:
High Guard wrote:
magneticgoop wrote:
High Guard wrote:Power of Ten is a great show, what were the results on that question?

No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
now i forgot i think it was around 30% but i am not sure now
30% That's a pretty big number

Fircoal wrote:
High Guard wrote: No way should any country have control over the entire planet.
So very true. Even worse if it was the USA.
Yes, at least not in it's current political state. If there ever is a world government then it should be run by a parliament with members from each country having equal power, be it Monaco or Russia.
Thats not fair. Larger countries should have more votes then smaller ones, otherwise larger ones like USA could just split each state into a country and have 52 votes rather then 1.
If the do that they would loose their power, there will simply be 52 small votes each on their own.

BTW 52?

Meant to be 50...But its wont be 50 small votes, it was suggested each country has the same amount of power, so it will be 50 equal votes.

Stopper · Post by **Stopper** » Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:44 am

It was me. I did it.

Stopper · Post by **Stopper** » Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:48 am

Damn you, mysterious second person!!

USA Domination

As an American do you think the world would be better if the USA controlled all of it? (Americans only please)