A new political test

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:00 pm

Slightly different to the pllitical compass...also aimed really at yankish politics....good nonetheless

http://www.politicalbrew.com/politest.cgi

I must've answered the bleeding thing incorrectly, as it rates me as a centrist-liberal....well mildly rightist, and mildly liberal....maybe I'm talking to you pansies too often, but I think it is more due to the way that the questions are worded.

0-100: non-fiscal = 35, Fiscal = 55

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:09 pm

On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (12).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (4).

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:10 pm

Norse wrote:I must've answered the bleeding thing incorrectly, as it rates me as a centrist-liberal....well mildly rightist, and mildly liberal....maybe I'm talking to you pansies too often, but I think it is more due to the way that the questions are worded.

Either that or you're too much in denial.

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:12 pm

This website needs to be updated for today's presidential candidates.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:13 pm

On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (8).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (12).

I'm only slightly less liberal than unriggable...

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:13 pm

On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (9).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (15).

so there you go...now that you can see what correct thinking is, you guys can begin to see where you err from there...

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:14 pm

i dont know, i didnt like some of the phrasing and questioning on the issue, especially if i dont get some kind of barometer as to what is the distinction between low medium and high levels of importance.

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:14 pm

Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:15 pm

Norse wrote:Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.

i bet you the right to the other persons sig for one month, that at least 1 person get over 60 in non fiscal issues.

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:18 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
Norse wrote:Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.
i bet you the right to the other persons sig for one month, that at least 1 person get over 60 in non fiscal issues.

Where's beezer when you need him...

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:18 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
Norse wrote:Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.
i bet you the right to the other persons sig for one month, that at least 1 person get over 60 in non fiscal issues.

Hmmm...gun rights, gay marraige and druggies....methinks that this is a bum-deal considering certain religous persuasions...but hey, it's crimbo....deal!

On one basis though, that they are a a regular poster, and someone we actually know....eliminating foul-play issues

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:20 pm

fair play, im counting on jay, mtg, or even a guy like thornhart to get it.

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:22 pm

Hello there Norsey,

Well there i am as follows:

On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (10).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Moderate Liberal (27).

practically a fascist!

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:24 pm

surprise, surprise-LIBERAL! (non fiscal 9, fiscal, 12)
ah, norse how come the two greatest minds on CC are worlds apart...
still, i have to admire your taste in arses...oh, j-lo hmmmmmmmmmm...

Clive · Post by **Clive** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:24 pm

On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Centrist (45).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Moderate Liberal (36).

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:25 pm

Non Fiscal : 68

dissapointing

Fiscal : 95

better

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:27 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 better

FOR THE WIN!

i should have known it was you, youd never let me down napoleon....

give me some time norse, ill come up with something.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:27 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 better

Ladies and gentlemen, we have our card carrying Nazi.

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:31 pm

hecter wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 better
Ladies and gentlemen, we have our card carrying Nazi.

Thank you, thank you....I owe you all, I'd like to thank to my wife, for her loving support, my parents, my manager, and all of you, because you made this happen, this, momentous occasion for me, so, applaud yourselves...I am lost in a sea of emotion, I must thank my friends also, DancingRetard, Jizz-card...this is truly...

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:36 pm

Interesting.

Non-Fiscal = Moderate Liberal (39)
Fiscal = Centrist (56).

satanspaladin · Post by **satanspaladin** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:37 pm

well no surprise for me strong liberal non fiscal 6 fiscal 10

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:40 pm

Here's another one...based on Australia's political parties.

Notice the distinct way in which they set their questions out...slightly more to my taste.

Greens 38.5%
Australian Democrats 54.5%
Labor Party 61.4%
Family First 57.2%
Liberal Party 59.9%
National Party 54.6%
One Nation 80.4%

Now...my only question to aussies...is what "one nation" stands for?

http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/fun/politics-test/

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:43 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 better

See, despite your economical right, you still have a little bit of a heart.

Damn, the only mildly liberal thing I had said, was that gun laws should be tightened, though not outlawed, and gays can have civil service ceremonies, though not being labelled with "marraige".....

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:51 pm

Norse wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 better
See, despite your economical right, you still have a little bit of a heart.

Damn, the only mildly liberal thing I had said, was that gun laws should be tightened, though not outlawed, and gays can have civil service ceremonies, though not being labelled with "marraige".....

Shame, shame. Still, we all know that you ain't no goddam pinko-lefty, and tha ain't no paper you need to prove that, no suh!

Still, if you and I are only scoring 68 and 35, imagine Jizz-card and the teachintern trade union, they have got to be in the minus region

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:52 pm

Norse wrote:Here's another one...based on Australia's political parties.

Notice the distinct way in which they set their questions out...slightly more to my taste.

Greens 38.5%
Australian Democrats 54.5%
Labor Party 61.4%
Family First 57.2%
Liberal Party 59.9%
National Party 54.6%
One Nation 80.4%

Now...my only question to aussies...is what "one nation" stands for?

You got them as your highest percentage, so guess...

[size=0]Crazy nationalists[/size]

P.S. There's no link to the AUS one...

EDIT: Ahhh, now there is.

A new political test

A new political test

Re: A new political test