LAKOTA REVOLUTION
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- THORNHEART
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:47 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: USA
- Contact:
LAKOTA REVOLUTION
lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
Hello THORNHEART,
You have received a formal disciplinary warning.
THORNHEART has earned himself a 24 hour Forum ban..
1st user that hasn't taken the C&A Report Abuse / Spurious Reports Warning we give seriously.
You have received a formal disciplinary warning.
THORNHEART has earned himself a 24 hour Forum ban..
1st user that hasn't taken the C&A Report Abuse / Spurious Reports Warning we give seriously.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
This can only end poorly.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
which was stolen from them in the first placeTHORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)
-- share what ya got --
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
i honestly think i hate youDer Fuhrer wrote:That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
Did you join up to play CC at any time?Der Fuhrer wrote:That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
-- share what ya got --
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.radiojake wrote:which was stolen from them in the first placeTHORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
He's only saying it to start shit. 50 posts in his first day says it all. Kind of funny, hope he's having a good laughTyr wrote:i honestly think i hate youDer Fuhrer wrote:That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
-- share what ya got --
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
You do? I think my work is done then.Tyr wrote:i honestly think i hate youDer Fuhrer wrote:That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
well because (in the case of the US, and Australia) they were imperialist invaders who took over the running of the entire land, and gave next to nothing back. Australia even had a 'white australia policy' until the 1960's - Pretty weird considering it isn't a white native country.Der Fuhrer wrote:I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.radiojake wrote:which was stolen from them in the first placeTHORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)
Don't see any of the race groups you mentioned going to that kind of extreme.
-- share what ya got --
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.radiojake wrote:Did you join up to play CC at any time?Der Fuhrer wrote:That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
Der Fuhrer wrote:You do? I think my work is done then.Tyr wrote:i honestly think i hate youDer Fuhrer wrote:That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
it took way longer then this for me to be even mildly annoyed by extras posts. in 40 minutes he has made me hate him
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
I would say that is debatable, but then you'll end up yelling some fascist dogma at me and claim that you owned me. I don't even need to bother with conversing with you anymore, I don't tend to hang around racist bigotsDer Fuhrer wrote: Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.
-- share what ya got --
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
he hasnt said anything racist yet but give him timeradiojake wrote:I would say that is debatable, but then you'll end up yelling some fascist dogma at me and claim that you owned me. I don't even need to bother with conversing with you anymore, I don't tend to hang around racist bigotsDer Fuhrer wrote: Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
Although socialism is about abolishing the ownership of the means of production, I think we should also abolish the ownership of asses, just in case the fascists intend to hoard them.radiojake wrote:I would say that is debatable, but then you'll end up yelling some fascist dogma at me and claim that you owned me. I don't even need to bother with conversing with you anymore, I don't tend to hang around racist bigotsDer Fuhrer wrote: Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.
now he said something racistTyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously
However untrue, not a bad idea at all.
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
Radio, you know how many different people have done that throughout history? And not just the "evil European/white people," but people of of every race, origin, and ethnicity. The Native Americans constantly fought eachother over land and food and such, and even used slavery in some tribes. I don't see thge Gauls complaining about the Franks or Normans or Romans. Or the Egyptians with the Greeks, Romans, and Arabs. Or Russia from the Mongols and the vikings. Not to mention the tribes of North and South America would constantly invade and absorb eachother.radiojake wrote:which was stolen from them in the first placeTHORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
It was actually in the 70's, which is even worse.radiojake wrote:well because (in the case of the US, and Australia) they were imperialist invaders who took over the running of the entire land, and gave next to nothing back. Australia even had a 'white australia policy' until the 1960's - Pretty weird considering it isn't a white native country.Der Fuhrer wrote:I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.radiojake wrote:which was stolen from them in the first placeTHORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)
Don't see any of the race groups you mentioned going to that kind of extreme.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Even though I said nothing that even begins to resemble racism, I could care less if it did. f*ck all non-whites. How's that for racism? White Power! How's that?Tyr wrote:now he said something racistTyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously
However untrue, not a bad idea at all.
how much valium did you take today?Der Fuhrer wrote:Even though I said nothing that even begins to resemble racism, I could care less if it did. f*ck all non-whites. How's that for racism? White Power! How's that?Tyr wrote:Tyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously
However untrue, not a bad idea at all.
?
now he said something racist
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
So it makes it right then?muy_thaiguy wrote:Radio, you know how many different people have done that throughout history? And not just the "evil European/white people," but people of of every race, origin, and ethnicity. The Native Americans constantly fought eachother over land and food and such, and even used slavery in some tribes. I don't see thge Gauls complaining about the Franks or Normans or Romans. Or the Egyptians with the Greeks, Romans, and Arabs. Or Russia from the Mongols and the vikings. Not to mention the tribes of North and South America would constantly invade and absorb eachother.radiojake wrote:which was stolen from them in the first placeTHORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)
-- share what ya got --
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION
Australia was not an Aborigine country either. Those fuckers were landed immigrants. Read a little history bitch.Skittles! wrote:It was actually in the 70's, which is even worse.radiojake wrote:well because (in the case of the US, and Australia) they were imperialist invaders who took over the running of the entire land, and gave next to nothing back. Australia even had a 'white australia policy' until the 1960's - Pretty weird considering it isn't a white native country.Der Fuhrer wrote:I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.radiojake wrote:which was stolen from them in the first placeTHORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)
Don't see any of the race groups you mentioned going to that kind of extreme.
-
Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am
After I took over your momma's pussy with my overwrought schlong, I took perhaps 4 of them.Tyr wrote:how much valium did you take today?Der Fuhrer wrote:Even though I said nothing that even begins to resemble racism, I could care less if it did. f*ck all non-whites. How's that for racism? White Power! How's that?Tyr wrote:Tyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?
yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously
However untrue, not a bad idea at all.
?
now he said something racist