These are suspected Secret Alliance
Suspect users: yankeesfan and jvkilsdonk
Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1269564
Comments: yankeesfan complained in ingame chat that two players with no obvious conflicted borders did not attack each other, then quoted jvkilsdonk in a forum http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 743#947743, indicating conversation regarding the game via pm and they haven't attacked each other since 12/10 (2 rounds), and avoid strong borders between the two players.
The question of their alliance has been asked in game and in another forum, but has not been answered by either, in either.
theplay02
yankeesfan and jvkilsdonk: secret alliance [noted]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
- king achilles
- Support Admin

- Posts: 13489
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
This has been noted. However, evidence from one game is not enough to warrant a block immediately, which is what we usually do. Not attacking one's borders does not always constitute a secret alliance. Feel free to leave a feedback about it supported with facts from the game. Please also be reminded that everyone in the game is also entitled to leave a feedback to all the players involved.
As for the other thread, the same thing is said for that. It seems the four of you are accusing each other of having a secret alliance against each other. For that, the four of you, patman with theplay02, and jvkilsdonk with yankeesfan will be noted on record. If any of you will be reported once again with the same player that you were accused of having an alleged alliance, we might consider having you guys blocked from playing together from that point on. If you have nothing to hide then this report won't matter anyway.
As for the other thread, the same thing is said for that. It seems the four of you are accusing each other of having a secret alliance against each other. For that, the four of you, patman with theplay02, and jvkilsdonk with yankeesfan will be noted on record. If any of you will be reported once again with the same player that you were accused of having an alleged alliance, we might consider having you guys blocked from playing together from that point on. If you have nothing to hide then this report won't matter anyway.
-
jvkilsdonk
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:36 am
- Location: Den Hague
-
jvkilsdonk
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:36 am
- Location: Den Hague
-
jvkilsdonk
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:36 am
- Location: Den Hague
you keept screaming multi and alliance and what have you!? and to be honest nothing really happend other than 2 players not being very agressive towards eachother, but on the otherhand green is so weak he isn't a threat, It wasn't until Red stepped into africa i acted against him.
The reason why I call you paranoid, and put you on my ignorelist for the future, is I couldn't see any alliances or multis! and I don't want to play against people who scream and accuse people of things, because next you'll accuse me of having a alliance with Red etc etc etc..
The reason why I call you paranoid, and put you on my ignorelist for the future, is I couldn't see any alliances or multis! and I don't want to play against people who scream and accuse people of things, because next you'll accuse me of having a alliance with Red etc etc etc..
- yankeesfan
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:06 pm
- Location: not telling you
-
jvkilsdonk
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:36 am
- Location: Den Hague


