AmenNobunaga wrote:.. Kill yourself.Chris7He wrote:Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!Neutrino wrote:Look a few posts up. 2% (IIRC) compounding annually dosen't sound like much, but over a century or so it is quite easy to double your population. A few more centuries and a few more doublings and the population shouldn't be too far off the several-hundred trillion max population of the solar system.Frigidus wrote:Fortunately for us, there is no way we could grow enough food for our population to reach that level.Neutrino wrote:No, eventually all the water will be in use at any one time. It will all be being recycled or used.Mr_Adams wrote: water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!
...
World too populated?
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Re: World too populated?
- Neutrino
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
- Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.
Re: World too populated?
I'm going to have to agree with Nobunaga on this one. Whatever happened to simply reducing population growth through encouraging people to have less children? Your ideas are more suited to 70 years ago. Utilize your self described prodigious intellect in the creation of some variety of time machine and transport yourself back to this time. Or, much more simply, commit suicide.Chris7He wrote:
Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!
Last edited by Neutrino on Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!
The Rogue State!
- bradleybadly
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:53 pm
- Location: Yes
Read the title of the poll. It asks if the world is overpopulated, not if it will be overpopulated. That's what I was responding to.Neutrino wrote:It's not that the world is currently overpopulated, but that it easily has the capacity to be.bradleybadly wrote:Overpopulation my ass. Some areas of the world are in fact underpopulated and will not be able to sustain their social programs for elderly citizens. Yes, the world population is growing but there isn't any overpopulation.
With our currect population growth, even the resources (water) of the entire solar system won't be enough in a millenia or two.
Re: World too populated?
if we aren't able to lower our population or decrease the amount of people on earth (go to moon/mars), we'll reach our carrying capacity. After that, pop. crashes. People starve. Cities that have been forced into dangerous areas will be destroyed. So, suicide doesn't exactly have to happen.Mr_Adams wrote:AmenNobunaga wrote:.. Kill yourself.Chris7He wrote:Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!Neutrino wrote:Look a few posts up. 2% (IIRC) compounding annually dosen't sound like much, but over a century or so it is quite easy to double your population. A few more centuries and a few more doublings and the population shouldn't be too far off the several-hundred trillion max population of the solar system.Frigidus wrote:Fortunately for us, there is no way we could grow enough food for our population to reach that level.Neutrino wrote: No, eventually all the water will be in use at any one time. It will all be being recycled or used.
...
Re: World too populated?
I guess we can just wait for the world to overpopulate and cause chaos instead...Neutrino wrote:I'm going to have to agree with Nobunaga on this one. Whatever happened to simply reducing population growth through encouraging people to have less children? Your ideas are more suited to 70 years ago. Utilize your self described prodigious intellect in the creation of some variety of time machine and transport yourself back to this time. Or, much more simply, commit suicide.Chris7He wrote:
Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!
Re: World too populated?
Encouraging people not to have children is bullshit. No one's gonna stop me from having sex. You'd probably have to start killing people to get them to listen. Besides, why the f*ck would third world countries and people listen to us? We're having more children. In the US, Bush wants every parent to have three children. One for the mother, one for the father, and one for the "country".Neutrino wrote:I'm going to have to agree with Nobunaga on this one. Whatever happened to simply reducing population growth through encouraging people to have less children? Your ideas are more suited to 70 years ago. Utilize your self described prodigious intellect in the creation of some variety of time machine and transport yourself back to this time. Or, much more simply, commit suicide.Chris7He wrote:
Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!
Re: World too populated?
Well, China just kills the extra children. Also, is Bush a moron? We have enough problems as it is. Why does he want this?Chris7He wrote:Encouraging people not to have children is bullshit. No one's gonna stop me from having sex. You'd probably have to start killing people to get them to listen. Besides, why the f*ck would third world countries and people listen to us? We're having more children. In the US, Bush wants every parent to have three children. One for the mother, one for the father, and one for the "country".Neutrino wrote:I'm going to have to agree with Nobunaga on this one. Whatever happened to simply reducing population growth through encouraging people to have less children? Your ideas are more suited to 70 years ago. Utilize your self described prodigious intellect in the creation of some variety of time machine and transport yourself back to this time. Or, much more simply, commit suicide.Chris7He wrote:
Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!
I don't like her. I did that as a joke and to kick up my post count.The1exile wrote:The overpopulation issue will have to take care of itself eventually.
That said, that retard with the fetish for the ginger girl should under NO circumstances be put in charge of the forthcoming ecology via killing program.
- Neutrino
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
- Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.
Re: World too populated?
Chris7He wrote:
Encouraging people not to have children is bullshit. No one's gonna stop me from having sex. You'd probably have to start killing people to get them to listen. Besides, why the f*ck would third world countries and people listen to us? We're having more children. In the US, Bush wants every parent to have three children. One for the mother, one for the father, and one for the "country".
I agree, trying to stop humans from having sex is a rather futile effort. This is where such revolutionary concepts as contraception comes in. Population growth in developed countries is already falling, despite the best efforts of their respective governments. Bring up the standard of living in their world countries and they will presumably follow suit. Of course, this would be difficult, to say the least, but at least it's a viable alternative to mass murder.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!
The Rogue State!
Re: World too populated?
First of all, you can't combat water (your location thingy)Neutrino wrote:Chris7He wrote:
Encouraging people not to have children is bullshit. No one's gonna stop me from having sex. You'd probably have to start killing people to get them to listen. Besides, why the f*ck would third world countries and people listen to us? We're having more children. In the US, Bush wants every parent to have three children. One for the mother, one for the father, and one for the "country".
I agree, trying to stop humans from having sex is a rather futile effort. This is where such revolutionary concepts as contraception comes in. Population growth in developed countries is already falling, despite the best efforts of their respective governments. Bring up the standard of living in their world countries and they will presumably follow suit. Of course, this would be difficult, to say the least, but at least it's a viable alternative to mass murder.
Second of all, I don't think that's an effect that affects all modernized nations. It depends more on what the society believes as taboo and who often they think we should have sex.
Third of all, mass murder and starvation is a viable alternative and much cheaper than trying to bring up all of the third world nations to our level of advancement.
Give 'em to necrophiliacsSkittles! wrote:Ah, but what do you do with the mass murdered? That comes as another question. We can't burn it, too much carbon dioxide would go in the air. We can't put them in the water, marine life would die due to all the gases. We can bury it, but we would run out of room soon enough.
- got tonkaed
- Posts: 5034
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Detroit
- got tonkaed
- Posts: 5034
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Detroit
Burning = Mass amounts of disease would spread if not contaminated early and too much carbon dioxide.Chris7He wrote:I was joking. I think we should burn 'em as fuel or stick 'em in the ground. We have enough room.got tonkaed wrote:naw that wouldnt work....youd get a public outcry at that sort of thing, its unseemlyChris7He wrote:
Give 'em to necrophiliacs
You could have them fed to wildlife or cannibalized...
Burying = Probably would work. We could stick a few thousand in the Himalayas.
What about some good ol' cannibalization? What about giving back to nature?Skittles! wrote:Burning = Mass amounts of disease would spread if not contaminated early and too much carbon dioxide.Chris7He wrote:I was joking. I think we should burn 'em as fuel or stick 'em in the ground. We have enough room.got tonkaed wrote:naw that wouldnt work....youd get a public outcry at that sort of thing, its unseemlyChris7He wrote:
Give 'em to necrophiliacs
You could have them fed to wildlife or cannibalized...
Burying = Probably would work. We could stick a few thousand in the Himalayas.
Mr_Adams wrote:Ne1 who thinls the world is overpopulated can help fix the problem by a:getting castrated b:removing themselves from life

I like my balls...you get yours cut off first!
Last edited by DaGip on Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis


