GIANT Risk
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Blueneutron
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Burlington, Vermont
GIANT Risk
Anyone like the idea of a larger map with more territories meant to take longer and have more neutrals? Say, twice as large as the Realms map, but like normal gameplay?
It could be a land-mass type game, rather than something surreal-based. Also, a longer lasting game, but balanced by high armies each turn. 6 players could be battling at a time with as much as 150 armies each.
It could be a land-mass type game, rather than something surreal-based. Also, a longer lasting game, but balanced by high armies each turn. 6 players could be battling at a time with as much as 150 armies each.
-
whitestazn88
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: behind you
- Contact:
-
Blueneutron
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Burlington, Vermont
well, sort of
World 2.0 is sort of like that, but
1) It's an older map and sort of boring after the 20th time
2) There aren't a lot of neutrals
3) There's no megabattles, i.e. 100 armies for each player
I'm thinking more along the lines of epic
1) It's an older map and sort of boring after the 20th time
2) There aren't a lot of neutrals
3) There's no megabattles, i.e. 100 armies for each player
I'm thinking more along the lines of epic
There is a map, soon to start development, that when finished will be in the 400-600 territory range.
- lord voldemort
- Posts: 9596
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Launceston, Australia
- Contact:
