yeah but indie has a certain style.magneticgoop wrote:indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are.
Question about "Cum on Feel the Noise"
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- cena-rules
- Posts: 9740
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Chat
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Guess that's why I don't know many Indie bands.magneticgoop wrote:indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
- magneticgoop
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
- Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(
nopecena-rules wrote:yeah but indie has a certain style.magneticgoop wrote:indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are.
in·die (ĭn'dē) Pronunciation Key
n. Informal
1. One, such as a studio or producer, that is unaffiliated with a larger or more commercial organization.
2. An artistic work produced by an independent company or group: "[His film] showed that indies could . . . take in millions at the box office" (Liesl Schillinger).
adj. Of, relating to, or being an indie: an album of indie rock; an indie film company.
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.

- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.muy_thaiguy wrote:Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.Arbustos wrote:Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.muy_thaiguy wrote:Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Oh... so you like disco?muy_thaiguy wrote:It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.Arbustos wrote:Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.muy_thaiguy wrote:Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Not that kind of music!Arbustos wrote:Oh... so you like disco?muy_thaiguy wrote:It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.Arbustos wrote:Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.muy_thaiguy wrote:Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
That kinda proves my point. If a right wing xenophobic bigot whos heart is so full of hate he probably woldnt recognise a passionate song if it came up and tongued him, that a good enough reason to like it.
Lets be honest-Oasis just rocked up Slades classic-how you can like one and not the other is beyond me, they are quite similar.
And i love Oasis, but thats all they are, a souped up Slade.
And nowt rong with that.
Lets be honest-Oasis just rocked up Slades classic-how you can like one and not the other is beyond me, they are quite similar.
And i love Oasis, but thats all they are, a souped up Slade.
And nowt rong with that.
Norse wrote: But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
I tried listening to it, and quite frankly, it pissed me off and hurt my ears at the same time.suggs wrote:That kinda proves my point. If a right wing xenophobic bigot whos heart is so full of hate he probably woldnt recognise a passionate song if it came up and tongued him, that a good enough reason to like it.
Lets be honest-Oasis just rocked up Slades classic-how you can like one and not the other is beyond me, they are quite similar.
And i love Oasis, but thats all they are, a souped up Slade.
And nowt rong with that.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Then i guess rock music isnt for you.
You might find "Ode to Joy" a bit too heavy as well.
Pehaps the Osmonds are more your cuppa tea.
You might find "Ode to Joy" a bit too heavy as well.
Pehaps the Osmonds are more your cuppa tea.
Last edited by suggs on Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Norse wrote: But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
No, Indie Rock isn't for me, Metal and Hard Rock are for me, Country, Jazz, Classical, whatever. I enjoy many types of music and don't need a "high and mighty, know everything," person to tell me what I should and shouldn't listen to. I listened to Oasis to hear what they sounded like, and quite hinestly, it sucked in comparison to both Slade and Quiet Riot, thank you very much.suggs wrote:Then i guess rock music isnt for you.
You might fing "Ode to Joy" a bit too heavy as well.
Pehaps the Osmonds are more your cuppa tea.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Glam Rock at it's finest, of course.suggs wrote:I wasnt telling you what to listen to. But Oasis is rock music, pure and simple. Nuff said.
And this is rock, pure and simple.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
- Snorri1234
- Posts: 3438
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
- Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
- Contact:
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12746
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
It was about Oasis' version being crap compared to the 1st two versions of the song.Snorri1234 wrote:I replied "no" on the general principle that I think Oasis is awesome.
I don't really care for the song in question actually. The f*ck if I care if they stole a song or whatever.
What is this about again?
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?