Heh... play by play is a feature of World at WarAndyDufresne wrote:I'll simply be a cheerleader, but I'm looking forward to watching the games or at least getting a play by play!
--Andy
How about a Website Callout?
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
If you CC folks want to play a freaking insane game, go to WaW and start a sequential, standard fortification (1 army move at the end), fog, CMD (cards of mass destruction), card type 4 (each set gives a random number of armies from 3 to 10), using the Castle map.
You will be pulling your hair and scratching your eyes out. First off, the Castle map is simply amazing... the dead ends... and the dungeon... oh... the DUNGEON! Heheheh
Your crossword map reminds me of how I felt when I first played the castle map.
vV
You will be pulling your hair and scratching your eyes out. First off, the Castle map is simply amazing... the dead ends... and the dungeon... oh... the DUNGEON! Heheheh
Your crossword map reminds me of how I felt when I first played the castle map.
vV
-
Blue Dragon
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:51 pm
- Contact:
We need a Master of Ceremonies
Its quickly obvious that we need a single point decision maker for this tourney thing. Someone not in the tourney of course but also someone who has at least some familiarity with both sites.
I'm going to let you choose this person lackattack. AFAIC it can be you yourself if you want, but we do need a single person to guide this thing and make the rules for it.
So lets get an MC and we'll be rolling!
I'm going to let you choose this person lackattack. AFAIC it can be you yourself if you want, but we do need a single person to guide this thing and make the rules for it.
So lets get an MC and we'll be rolling!
-
Blue Dragon
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:51 pm
- Contact:
Only since I found Catgirls.
Only since I found Catgirls.
They calm my spirit.
They calm my spirit.
-
quinnster9
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:07 pm
- Location: Montreal
-
lackattack
- Posts: 6097
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
- Location: Montreal, QC
I would definitely give the winner(s) 1 mo. Premium.
Here's my suggestion: Having two 6 person classic risk map games on each website. Each game will have 3 players from WaW, 3 from CC. There will be 4 winners, and a possibility of a tie between both teams. Even though it is single play, players from the same website could be allowed to make sacrifices to help one of theirs win the game. What do you guys think???
Here's my suggestion: Having two 6 person classic risk map games on each website. Each game will have 3 players from WaW, 3 from CC. There will be 4 winners, and a possibility of a tie between both teams. Even though it is single play, players from the same website could be allowed to make sacrifices to help one of theirs win the game. What do you guys think???
-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Poole, England
I like the idea, though I would like to see less cooperation amongst the players from each website. Though, if I were in a game and I had a choice to take a territory from a WaW or CC opponent, I'm sure I'd pick the CC player to attack. 
I suggested in the WaW forums that to keep things lively, if one competes in the tournament, they are ineligible for the next few months. That way more players will have an opportunity to win the prizes and to represent their site. Otherwise, we'll have the same pool of players competing every month and it will be less about the sites and more about the top tier of players.
Oooooh! Why don't we have the best compete, and the WORST compete. Pick the best 6 and the worst 6 as far as ranks go. Heheheh. That would be very interesting, indeed!
vV
I suggested in the WaW forums that to keep things lively, if one competes in the tournament, they are ineligible for the next few months. That way more players will have an opportunity to win the prizes and to represent their site. Otherwise, we'll have the same pool of players competing every month and it will be less about the sites and more about the top tier of players.
Oooooh! Why don't we have the best compete, and the WORST compete.
Pick the best 6 and the worst 6 as far as ranks go. Heheheh. That would be very interesting, indeed!vV
-
Blue Dragon
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:51 pm
- Contact:
Sure! Free premies for the winners. I kinda had that in mind already anyway but wanted to sync with lackattack as much as possible.
And Lack, you're the master of ceremonies as far as I'm concerned. First thing is we need to sync on a date to end the volunteers to represent each site. Name the date and the next morning the representatives from WAW will be named.
The game structure you have in mind is fine too. Classic map I assume.
Cards type? I guess to keep it as standard as possible, probably the progressive style would be best.
Single or unlimited fortifications? My preference would be single. Requires a bit more thought than unlimited and reducing luck at least somewhat would be a positive step.
As for Bondra - I fear him as an opponent. He kicks butt I know. But I would NEVER disqualify him. He's too good to not include. However he has to choose which website he wants to represent. It wont be held against him or anything like that I'm sure. Heck, we've ALREADY got lots of dual-memberships now! It HAS to be that way. I sure wouldn't want to try and exclude anyone who has an account on both sites - pretty soon there will be no one left!
And Lack, you're the master of ceremonies as far as I'm concerned. First thing is we need to sync on a date to end the volunteers to represent each site. Name the date and the next morning the representatives from WAW will be named.
The game structure you have in mind is fine too. Classic map I assume.
Cards type? I guess to keep it as standard as possible, probably the progressive style would be best.
Single or unlimited fortifications? My preference would be single. Requires a bit more thought than unlimited and reducing luck at least somewhat would be a positive step.
As for Bondra - I fear him as an opponent. He kicks butt I know. But I would NEVER disqualify him. He's too good to not include. However he has to choose which website he wants to represent. It wont be held against him or anything like that I'm sure. Heck, we've ALREADY got lots of dual-memberships now! It HAS to be that way. I sure wouldn't want to try and exclude anyone who has an account on both sites - pretty soon there will be no one left!
-
Grey Mouser
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:15 pm
come on over Grey! http://www.wawgame.com
As for bondra - well if I get to kill him, I don't care what site he plays for!
As for bondra - well if I get to kill him, I don't care what site he plays for!
guess I'm not a newbie anymore...
I'm gonna sit this one out. I am a WAW veteran of many years and a personal friend of lackattack's, so i'd rather just be a spectator.
To help facilitate the battle though, i will offer up this bit of knowledge - The CC rules have one HUGE difference with respect to eliminating players. CC allows a player to turn in a set of cards in the middle of a turn after the elimination (only if he has 5 or more total cards). This is in sharp contrast to WAW where one has to survive to his next turn to submit his cards. This rule promotes and fosters a more aggressive environment and games do not last nearly as long. CC also tempts players to eliminate others more because everyone receives a card at the end of their turn instead of the start of the next. Therefore an elimination target always has an extra card for you if you can take him out. All other diferences in the sites are minor.
Good luck all
Once i see who is representing each site i will post the betting lines...
To help facilitate the battle though, i will offer up this bit of knowledge - The CC rules have one HUGE difference with respect to eliminating players. CC allows a player to turn in a set of cards in the middle of a turn after the elimination (only if he has 5 or more total cards). This is in sharp contrast to WAW where one has to survive to his next turn to submit his cards. This rule promotes and fosters a more aggressive environment and games do not last nearly as long. CC also tempts players to eliminate others more because everyone receives a card at the end of their turn instead of the start of the next. Therefore an elimination target always has an extra card for you if you can take him out. All other diferences in the sites are minor.
Good luck all
Once i see who is representing each site i will post the betting lines...
I will beat you like a rented mule.
I have an account here and on WaW, but my loyalties are with WaW. No offense CC. I guess I just don't want to see Bondra playing for CC... you are right, he's VERY good.
vV
vV
Blue Dragon wrote:As for Bondra - I fear him as an opponent. He kicks butt I know. But I would NEVER disqualify him. He's too good to not include. However he has to choose which website he wants to represent. It wont be held against him or anything like that I'm sure. Heck, we've ALREADY got lots of dual-memberships now! It HAS to be that way. I sure wouldn't want to try and exclude anyone who has an account on both sites - pretty soon there will be no one left!